PRAC 6675 WEEK 7 DISCUSSION: COMPLEX CASE STUDY PRESENTATION

PRAC 6675 WEEK 7 DISCUSSION: COMPLEX CASE STUDY PRESENTATION

PRAC 6675 WEEK 7 DISCUSSION: COMPLEX CASE STUDY PRESENTATION

This week you participate in the second of three clinical discussions called grand rounds. In one of these 3 weeks, you will be a presenter as well as help facilitate the online discussion; in the others you will be an active discussion participant. When it is your week to present, you will create a focused SOAP note and a short didactic (teaching) video presenting a real (but de-identified) complex patient case from your practicum experience.

You should have received an assignment from your Instructor letting you know which week of the course you are assigned to present.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PRAC 6675 WEEK 7 DISCUSSION: COMPLEX CASE STUDY PRESENTATION HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery.Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

RESOURCES

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.

Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

WEEK 7 PARTICIPANTS:

BY MULTIPLE DAYS BETWEEN DAYS 4 AND 7

Respond at least 2 times each to all colleagues who presented this week (should be 2-3 presenters each week). The goal is for the discussion forum to function as robust clinical conferences on the patients. Provide a response to 1 of the 3 discussion prompts that your colleagues provided in their video presentations. You may also provide additional information, alternative points of view, research to support treatment, or patient education strategies you might use with the relevant patient.

Rubric

PRAC_6675_Week7_Discussion_Participant_Rubric

PRAC_6675_Week7_Discussion_Participant_Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResponses
85 to >76.0 pts

Excellent

Responses exhibit synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings…. Responses provide clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources…. Responses demonstrate synthesis and understanding of Learning Objectives…. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues…. Presenters’ prompts/questions posed in the case presentations are thoroughly addressed…. Responses are effectively written in standard, edited English.

76 to >67.0 pts

Good

Responses exhibit critical thinking and application to practice settings…. Responses provide clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by 2 or more credible sources…. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues…. Presenters’ prompts/questions posed in the case presentations are addressed…. Responses are effectively written in standard, edited English.

67 to >59.0 pts

Fair

Responses are on topic and may have some depth…. Responses may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and only one or no credible sources are cited…. Responses posted in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication…. Presenters’ prompts/questions posed in the case presentations are inadequately addressed.

59 to >0 pts

Poor

Responses may not be on topic and lack depth…. No credible sources are cited…. Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective professional communication…. Responses to colleagues’ prompts/questions are missing.
85 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeParticipation
15 to >13.0 pts

Excellent

Meets requirements for participation by responding at least twice to each colleague who presented this week. Responses are carried out over multiple days between Days 4 and 7.

13 to >11.0 pts

Good

Meets requirements for participation by responding at least twice to each colleague who presented this week, over at least 2 days.

11 to >10.0 pts

Fair

Participants respond at least twice to each colleague who presented this week, but responses may occur all in 1 day.

10 to >0 pts

Poor

Does not meet requirements for participation by responding at least twice to each colleague who presented this week.

15 pts

Total Points: 100