Week 2 Assignment: Benchmark – Capstone Project Topic Selection and Approval

Week 2 Assignment: Benchmark – Capstone Project Topic Selection and Approval

Week 2 Assignment: Benchmark – Capstone Project Topic Selection and Approval

Assessment Description

In collaboration with the approved clinical preceptor, students will identify a specific evidence-based topic for the capstone project change proposal. Students should consider the clinical environment in which they are currently employed or have recently worked. The capstone project topic can be a clinical practice problem, an organizational issue, a leadership or quality improvement initiative, or an unmet educational need specific to a patient population or community. The selected problem should encourage the student to engage in interprofessional collaborative practice.

Students should select a topic that aligns to their area of interest as well as the clinical practice setting in which practice hours are completed.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE Week 2 Assignment: Benchmark – Capstone Project Topic Selection and Approval HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

This project is only a proposal and will not be implemented in a practice setting.

Write a 750-1000-word description of your proposed capstone project topic. Include the following:

Describe the problem or issue that will be the focus of the change proposal. Explain with which category (leadership or community) the selected topic would best align.

Discuss the setting or context in which the problem or issue can be observed and describe the population affected by this problem or issue.

Discuss the implications this clinical practice problem or issue has on nursing practice.

Based on your needs assessment in Topic 1, describe why this is a priority for the community/clinical site or affected clinical population.

Briefly describe the organizational structure (mission, vision, values, leadership structure, etc.) of the practicum site. What internal and external processes will impact care coordination for the selected population or community?

How effective has the organization been in addressing the identified problem or issue?

You are required to cite a minimum of three peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the past 5 years, appropriate for the assignment criteria, and relevant to nursing practice.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:

RN-BSN

7.1: Apply knowledge of systems to work effectively across the continuum of care.

7.3: Optimize system effectiveness through application of innovation and evidence-based practice.

American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education

This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competencies 3.1, 7.1 and 7.3

Skip to main contentEnable accessibility for visually impairedOpen the accessibility menuOpen the Accessible Navigation Menu

Benchmark – Capstone Project Topic Selection and Approval – Rubric

LISTGRID

PRINT TO PDF

Rubric Criteria

Total40 points

Criterion

1. Unsatisfactory

2. Insufficient

3. Approaching

4. Acceptable

5. Target

Problem or Issue of Proposal

Describe the problem or issue of the change proposal, including the category the topic best aligns to.

0 points

A description of the problem or issue of the change proposal, including which category the topic best aligns to, is missing.
6 points

A description of the problem or issue of the change proposal, including which category the topic best aligns to, is incomplete or inaccurate.
6.32 points

A description of the problem or issue of the change proposal, including which category the topic best aligns to, is present but lacks detail.
7.12 points

A description of the problem or issue of the change proposal, including which category the topic best aligns to, is detailed and mostly accurate.

8 points

A description of the problem or issue of the change proposal, including which category the topic best aligns to, is thorough and accurate.

Setting or Context of Problem

Discuss the setting or context the problem or issue can be observed in, including the population affected.

0 points

A discussion of the setting or context the problem or issue can be observed in, including the population affected, is missing.
2.4 points

A discussion of the setting or context the problem or issue can be observed in, including the population affected, is incomplete or inaccurate.

2.53 points

A discussion of the setting or context the problem or issue can be observed in, including the population affected, is present but lacks detail.
2.85 points

A discussion of the setting or context the problem or issue can be observed in, including the population affected, is detailed and mostly accurate.
3.2 points

A discussion of the setting or context the problem or issue can be observed in, including the population affected, is thorough and accurate.

Implications of Practice Problems or Issues

Discuss the implications of the clinical practice problems or issues on nursing practices.

0 points

A discussion of the implications of the clinical practice problems or issues on nursing practices is missing.
2.4 points

A discussion of the implications of the clinical practice problems or issues on nursing practices is incomplete or inaccurate.
2.53 points

A discussion of the implications of the clinical practice problems or issues on nursing practices is present but lacks detail.
2.85 points

A discussion of the implications of the clinical practice problems or issues on nursing practices is detailed and mostly accurate.
3.2 points

A discussion of the implications of the clinical practice problems or issues on nursing practices is thorough and accurate.

Priority of Community/Clinical Site or Population

Describe why this is a priority for the community/clinical site or affected clinical population.

0 points

A description of why this is a priority for the community/clinical site or affected clinical population is missing.
2.4 points

A description of why this is a priority for the community/clinical site or affected clinical population is incomplete or inaccurate.

2.53 points

A description of why this is a priority for the community/clinical site or affected clinical population is present but lacks detail.
2.85 points

A description of why this is a priority for the community/clinical site or affected clinical population is detailed and mostly accurate.

3.2 points

A description of why this is a priority for the community/clinical site or affected clinical population is thorough and accurate.

Organizational Structure (B)

Describe the organizational structure, including how it impacts care coordination for the selected population. (C7.1)
0 points

A description of the organizational structure, including how it impacts care coordination for the selected population, is missing.

3.9 points

A description of the organizational structure, including how it impacts care coordination for the selected population, is incomplete or inaccurate.

4.11 points

A description of the organizational structure, including how it impacts care coordination for the selected population, is present but lacks detail.
4.63 points

A description of the organizational structure, including how it impacts care coordination for the selected population, is mostly detailed.

5.2 points

A description of the organizational structure, including how it impacts care coordination for the selected population, is thorough and accurate.

Organizational Effectiveness (B)

Explain how effective the organization has been in addressing the identified problem or issue. (C7.3)
0 points

An explanation of how effective the organization has been in addressing the identified problem or issue is missing.
3.9 points

An explanation of how effective the organization has been in addressing the identified problem or issue is incomplete or inaccurate.

4.11 points

An explanation of how effective the organization has been in addressing the identified problem or issue is present but lacks detail.
4.63 points

An explanation of how effective the organization has been in addressing the identified problem or issue is mostly detailed.

5.2 points

An explanation of how effective the organization has been in addressing the identified problem or issue is thorough and accurate.

Thesis, Position, or Purpose

Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.
0 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident.
2.1 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience

2.21 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very little awareness of the intended audience.
2.49 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific audience.

2.8 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of the appropriate audience is demonstrated.

Development, Structure, and Conclusion

Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development.
0 points

No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.
2.1 points

Writing lacks logical progression of the thesis, position, or purpose. Some organization is attempted, but ideas are disconnected. Conclusion is unclear and not supported by the overall development of the purpose.
2.21 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and logical conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
2.49 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
2.8 points

Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.

Evidence

Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives.
0 points

Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of the writer.

1.8 points

Evidence is limited or irrelevant. The interpretation of other perspectives is superficial or incorrect.
1.9 points

Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other perspectives is present.
2.14 points

Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.
2.4 points

Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Relevant perspectives of others are clearly considered.

Mechanics of Writing

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
1.8 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

1.9 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
2.14 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

2.4 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

Format/Documentation

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.
0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

1.2 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.

1.26 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.

1.42 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
1.6 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.