Week 3 Assignment: PICOT Question Development
Week 3 Assignment: PICOT Question Development
Assessment Description
The purpose of this assignment is to develop a PICOT question. A PICOT (Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome and Time) question starts with a designated patient population in a particular clinical area and identifies clinical problems or issues that arise from clinical care. The intervention used to address the problem must be a nursing practice intervention. Include a comparison of the nursing intervention to a patient population not currently receiving the nursing intervention, and specify the timeframe needed to implement the change process.
Using the “PICOT Question” template, formulate a PICOT question applying the PICOT format that addresses the approved clinical nursing problem from Topic 2.
ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE Week 3 Assignment: PICOT Question Development HERE
Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us
The PICOT question will provide a framework for your capstone project change proposal.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education
This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competencies 3.1
Attachments
NRS-465-RS-T3-PICOTDevelopment.d
Skip to main contentEnable accessibility for visually impairedOpen the accessibility menuOpen the Accessible Navigation Menu
PICOT Question Development – Rubric
LISTGRID
PRINT TO PDF
Rubric Criteria
Total50 points
Criterion
1. Unsatisfactory
2. Insufficient
3. Approaching
4. Acceptable
5. Target
PICOT Question Template
List applicable population, intervention, comparison, outcome, and timeline.
0 points
An applicable population, intervention, comparison, outcome, and timeline is missing.
3.75 points
The population, intervention, comparison, outcome, and timeline is inaccurate or incomplete.
3.95 points
An applicable population, intervention, comparison, outcome, and timeline is present but lacks detail.
4.45 points
An applicable population, intervention, comparison, outcome, and timeline is mostly detailed.
5 points
An applicable population, intervention, comparison, outcome, and timeline is thorough and accurate.
PICOT Question
Finalize a PICOT question.
0 points
A finalized PICOT question is missing.
3.75 points
A finalized PICOT question is inaccurate or incomplete.
3.95 points
A finalized PICOT question is present but lacks detail.
4.45 points
A finalized PICOT question is mostly detailed.
5 points
A finalized PICOT question is thorough and accurate.
Problem Statement
Provide a problem statement for the student’s PICOT question.
0 points
A problem statement is missing.
3.75 points
A problem statement is inaccurate or incomplete.
3.95 points
A problem statement is present but lacks detail.
4.45 points
A problem statement is mostly detailed.
5 points
A problem statement is thorough and accurate.
Population
Describe the population of interest, including its functional and problem-solving capabilities.
0 points
A description of the population of interest, including its functional and problem-solving capabilities, is missing.
3.75 points
A description of the population of interest, including its functional and problem-solving capabilities, is inaccurate or incomplete.
3.95 points
A description of the population of interest, including its functional and problem-solving capabilities, is present but lacks detail.
4.45 points
A description of the population of interest, including its functional and problem-solving capabilities, is mostly detailed.
5 points
A description of the population of interest, including its functional and problem-solving capabilities, is thorough and accurate.
Nursing Intervention
Describe a nursing intervention used to address the problem.
0 points
A description of a nursing intervention used to address the problem is missing.
5.63 points
A description of a nursing intervention used to address the problem is inaccurate or incomplete.
5.93 points
A description of a nursing intervention used to address the problem is present but lacks detail.
6.68 points
A description of a nursing intervention used to address the problem is mostly detailed.
7.5 points
A description of a nursing intervention used to address the problem is thorough and accurate.
Comparison
Compare the nursing intervention to what is currently in place at the student’s practicum site/selecting setting.
0 points
A comparison of the nursing intervention versus what is currently in place at the student’s practicum site/selecting setting is missing.
3.75 points
A comparison of the nursing intervention versus what is currently in place at the student’s practicum site/selecting setting is inaccurate or incomplete.
3.95 points
A comparison of the nursing intervention versus what is currently in place at the student’s practicum site/selecting setting is present but lacks detail.
4.45 points
A comparison of the nursing intervention versus what is currently in place at the student’s practicum site/selecting setting is present but lacks detail.
5 points
A comparison of the nursing intervention versus what is currently in place at the student’s practicum site/selecting setting is thorough and accurate.
Outcome
Describe the expected outcome for the selected intervention.
0 points
A description of the expected outcome for the selected intervention is missing.
3.75 points
A description of the expected outcome for the selected intervention is inaccurate or incomplete.
3.95 points
A description of the expected outcome for the selected intervention is present but lacks detail.
4.45 points
A description of the expected outcome for the selected intervention is mostly detailed.
5 points
A description of the expected outcome for the selected intervention is thorough and accurate.
Time Frame
Describe the time frame for implementing the proposed intervention and evaluating the outcome.
0 points
A description of the time frame for implementing the proposed intervention and evaluating the outcome is missing.
3.75 points
A description of the time frame for implementing the proposed intervention and evaluating the outcome is inaccurate or incomplete.
3.95 points
A description of the time frame for implementing the proposed intervention and evaluating the outcome is present but lacks detail.
4.45 points
A description of the time frame for implementing the proposed intervention and evaluating the outcome is mostly detailed.
5 points
A description of the time frame for implementing the proposed intervention and evaluating the outcome is thorough and accurate.
Evidence
Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives.
0 points
Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of the writer.
1.88 points
Evidence is limited or irrelevant. The interpretation of other perspectives is superficial or incorrect.
1.98 points
Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other perspectives is present.
2.23 points
Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.
2.5 points
Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Relevant perspectives of others are clearly considered.
Mechanics of Writing
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
1.88 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
1.98 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
2.23 points
No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.
2.5 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
Format/Documentation
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.
0 points
Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
1.88 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.
1.98 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.
2.23 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
2.5 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.