Week 6 Assignment: : Reading Research Literature Worksheet
Week 6 Assignment: : Reading Research Literature Worksheet
ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE Week 6 Assignment: : Reading Research Literature Worksheet HERE
Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us
Name:
Date: Complete the required worksheet after reading the assigned article for the session. The NR439 Reading Research Literature Worksheet Rubric must be used to answer each of the graded criterion for the following: |
|
Purpose of the Study | |
Type of Research & the Design | |
Sample | |
Data Collection | |
Data Analysis | |
Limitations | |
Findings/Discussion | |
Reading Research Literature |
A Sample Of This Assignment Written By One Of Our Top-rated Writers
Week 6: Reading Research Literature Worksheet
Name:
Date: Complete the required worksheet after reading the assigned article for the session. The NR439 Reading Research Literature Worksheet Rubric must be used to answer each of the grading criteria for the following: |
|
Purpose of the Study | The COVID-19 pandemic brought about unprecedented challenges to healthcare professionals by overwhelming departments, causing unfavorable nurse-to-patient ratios, increasing time pressure, and exposing healthcare professionals to an increased workload. One of the most profound consequences of these challenges is decision fatigue. According to Persson et al. (2019), decision fatigue is the depleting effects of repeated decision-making. In a scholarly article, “decision fatigue among clinical nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic,” Piagnatiello et al. (2020) identify decision fatigue as an effect of consistently making repeated choices, regulating emotions, and/or controlling behavior.
The COVID-19 pandemic increases nurses’ susceptibility to decision fatigue by completely altering the nursing work environment. In this sense, nurses face the daunting task of providing care to patients for a strange disease by following predetermined protocols. Consequently, this consideration predisposes nurses to psychological trauma and affects their decision-making competencies. As a result, the purpose of this study was to report the psychometric properties, including the validity and reliability of the decision fatigue scale (DFS). |
Type of Research & the Design | The study was a secondary analysis of a parent study using a cross-sectional descriptive design. A descriptive design enabled researchers to explore the psychological impact of working as a nurse during the COVID-19 pandemic (Piagnatiello et al., 2020). Finally, the “Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology” checklist guided the study’s design and reporting procedures. |
Sample | The study involved 160 staff nurses recruited online from various parts of the United States. The researchers administered an investigator-developed demographic form to capture participants’ socio-demographic information, including age, gender, race, and education level. Also, this form captured information regarding clinical practice, including practice settings and years of experience. Equally, participants completed study instruments alongside the socio-economic form for the primary study. |
Data Collection | The initial data collection process began with the administration of the demographic form to capture participants’ socio-demographic information like age, race, gender, and education level, as well as information regarding clinical practice, such as years of experience and practice setting. Secondly, researchers administered a 9-item decision fatigue scale (DFS), a self-report instrument to measure the amount of respondent decision fatigue over the prior 24 hours. Thirdly, the researchers used a 4-point Likert scale to score the DFS items ranging from 0 (strongly disagree) to 3 (strongly agree).
While collecting data on clinical practice, researchers used the Practice Environment Scale of Nursing Work Index (PES-NWI). The PES-NWI emanates from the 48-item Nursing Work Index (NWI) created by Kramer and Hafner in 1989. The PES-NWI is a 31-item scale subdivided into five subscales: nurse participation in hospital affairs, nursing foundations for quality of care, nurse manager ability, leadership and support of nurses, staffing and resources, and collegial nurse-physician relations. Finally, researchers used the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) to measure self-reported distress related to the experience of a traumatic event. In this case, the traumatic event was the COVID-19 pandemic. The IES-R scale encompassed three subscales that measured intrusion, avoidance, and hyperarousal. |
Data Analysis | After collecting data using the three approaches, the researchers analyze it using IBM SPSS ver. 27. Then, they used descriptive statistics for participants and DFS items, including frequencies, means, and standard deviations to appraise the samples’ characteristics. Further, researchers used univariate statistics (skewness and kurtosis) to evaluate the 9 DFS items for further psychometric analyses. |
Limitations | The study was a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional, descriptive study constrained by various limitations that require further research. These limitations include the possibility of exaggerated findings due to the sheer negative psychological consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic and the disruption of typical routine decisions due to the constraints of the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, it is valid to argue that the researchers measured decision fatigue in nurses in absence of attributions to their work environment. These research limitations affect the findings’ validity and generalizability. |
Findings/Discussion | The study found that the 9-item DFS demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties among staff nurses working at least 20 hours per week during the COVID-19 pandemic. Further, the DFS scores strongly correlated with traumatic stress and moderately correlated with the nursing practice environment. Also, the study revealed the DFS’s moderate inverse relationship with the PES-NWI, indicating that participants who reported a less desirable work environment also reported higher levels of decision fatigue. |
Reading Research Literature | Reading research literature is an essential approach to appraising evidence sources. Ferreira & Patino (2018) define critical appraisal as “the systematic evaluation of clinical research papers that helps us to establish if the results are valid and if they could be used to inform the clinical decision in a given local population and context” (p. 448). It is essential to note that reading research literature allows the reader to have an idea of the effectiveness of various research methods, designs, and instruments and establish the validity of the findings. In this sense, the reader can identify research strengths, limitations, validity, and consistency with the study’s purpose, research questions, and hypotheses. Also, reading research literature enables readers to obtain insights into evidence-based interventions for addressing clinical questions and problems and establish the evidence’s reliability, relevance, currency, authority, and purpose. |
References
Ferreira, J. C., & Patino, C. M. (2018). Critical appraisal of the literature. Why do we care? Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia, 44(6), 448. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1806-37562018000000364
Persson, E., Barrafrem, K., Meunier, A., & Tinghög, G. (2019). The effect of decision fatigue on surgeons’ clinical decision making. Health Economics, 28(10). https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.3933
Pignatiello, G. A., Tsivitse, E., O’Brien, J., Kraus, N., & Hickman, R. L. (2021). Decision fatigue among clinical nurses during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 869–877. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15939