WEEK 6 CLINICAL ASSIGNMENT 2: ORGANIZATION MEETING SUMMARY\NURS 8302
WEEK 6 CLINICAL ASSIGNMENT 2: ORGANIZATION MEETING SUMMARY\NURS 8302
CLINICAL ASSIGNMENT 2: ORGANIZATION MEETING SUMMARY
Preparation to begin your DNP Project begins with the meeting with an organization to explore a gap in practice or a practice change that you might address as your DNP Project. Preparing for this meeting includes following the instructions in your NURS 8302 course and reviewing the guidelines for your practicum assignment 1.
By Day 7 of Week 6, you will complete a 4–5-page paper that addresses the content for your organization meeting summary. As a guide, you can use the APA 7 template for writing graduate papers found at https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates/general
Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us
RESOURCES
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
WEEKLY RESOURCES
LEARNING RESOURCES
Required Readings
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2022). Primary care practice facilitation curriculumLinks to an external site.. https://www.ahrq.gov/ncepcr/tools/transform-qi/deliver-facilitation/curriculum/index.html
Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs. (2017). Quality improvement in maternity care via project ECHOLinks to an external site.. https://amchp.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Project-ECHO_Practice-Handout_Emerging.pdf
Knox, L., & Brach, C. (2015). Module 20. Creating quality improvement teams and QI plansLinks to an external site.. In, Primary care practice facilitation curriculumLinks to an external site.. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. https://www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/ncepcr/tools/PCMH/pcpf-module-20-creating-qi-teams.pdf
Walden University, LLC. (2021). Doctoral committee matching formLinks to an external site..
Document: Organizational Culture Assessment Tool (Word document)Download Organizational Culture Assessment Tool (Word document)
Document: Organization Meeting Summary (Word document)Download Organization Meeting Summary (Word document)
To Prepare:
Review and access the Organization Meeting Summary template provided in the Learning Resources.
Consider your responses to the prompts and guiding questions provided on the Organization Meeting Summary template.
The Assignment: (4-5 pages)
Using the Organization Meeting Summary template as a guide, address the following:
Introduction
Identify the organization, location, and participants at the meeting. Indicate the role each person plays in the organization.
How did you first approach the organization?
Why did you select this organization?
Does the organization have a key person for the organization who oversees students doing DNP projects?
If there is no key person, who represented nursing and/or nursing students at the meeting.
Describe the DNP Project
Describe exactly what you did to explain the DNP project process at Walden University.
What questions did the participants have and how did you respond?
How did you and the organization identify possible gaps in practice or practice changes that might be addressed by the DNP project.
Describe the gap or problem and cite two sources that justify the gap or problem in nursing.
What approach (clinical practice guideline, staff education, quality improvement initiative) did you discuss to address a practice gap or practice change?
What questions did the organization representatives have, and what were your responses?
How does the proposed practice change support positive social change, diversity, equity, and inclusion?
Project Team
Who would be the key stakeholders and potential team members (e.g. organization leader, project mentor) for a project to address gap in practice or practice change?
Next Steps
Describe the information that you provided to the organization regarding the next steps in the process.
What questions were asked?
What responses did you have?
What decisions were made?
Evidence
Explore three sources of current evidence (no older than five (5) years) that could support the project initiative. You may include the two citations you cited under the Describe the DNP Project section.
Summary
Summarize the strengths and weaknesses of the meeting.
What would you have done differently?
What additional information do you need before you meet with your faculty advisor in NURS 8702, project mentoring course.
BY DAY 7
Submit your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 6.
SUBMISSION INFORMATION
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.
To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK6Assgn3_LastName_Firstinitial
Then, click on Start Assignment 3 near the top of the page.
Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment 3 for review.
Rubric
NURS_8302_Week6_Assignment3_Rubric
NURS_8302_Week6_Assignment3_Rubric
| Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction |
| 10 to >8.0 ptsFull Marks
The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the organization, location, and participants at the meeting, the role each person plays in the organization how you first approached the organization, why you selected this organization, a key person for the organization who oversees students doing DNP projects and if there is no key person, who represented nursing and/or nursing students at the meeting. |
8 to >6.0 ptsGood
The response accurately explains the organization, location, and participants at the meeting, the role each person plays in the organization how you first approached the organization, why you selected this organization, a key person for the organization who oversees students doing DNP projects and if there is no key person, who represented nursing and/or nursing students at the meeting. |
6 to >4.0 ptsFair
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the organization, location, and participants at the meeting, the role each person plays in the organization how you first approached the organization, why you selected this organization, a key person for the organization who oversees students doing DNP projects and if there is no key person, who represented nursing and/or nursing students at the meeting. |
4 to >0 ptsPoor
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the organization, location, and participants at the meeting, the role each person plays in the organization how you first approached the organization, why you selected this organization, a key person for the organization who oversees students doing DNP projects and if there is no key person, who represented nursing and/or nursing students at the meeting. |
|
10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe the DNP Project |
| 15 to >12.0 ptsFull Marks
The response comprehensively and fully describes in detail exactly what you did to explain the DNP project process at Walden University and includes the following information: What questions did the participants have and how did you respond? How did you and the organization identify possible gaps in practice or practice changes that might be addressed by the DNP project. Describe the gap or problem and cite two sources that justify the gap or problem in nursing. What approach (clinical practice guideline, staff education, quality improvement initiative) did you discuss to address a practice gap or practice change? What questions did the organization representatives have, and what were your responses? How does the proposed practice change support positive social change, diversity, equity, and inclusion? |
12 to >9.0 ptsGood
The response describes what you did to explain the DNP project process at Walden University and includes the following information: What questions did the participants have and how did you respond? How did you and the organization identify possible gaps in practice or practice changes that might be addressed by the DNP project. Describe the gap or problem and cite two sources that justify the gap or problem in nursing. What approach (clinical practice guideline, staff education, quality improvement initiative) did you discuss to address a practice gap or practice change? What questions did the organization representatives have, and what were your responses? How does the proposed practice change support positive social change, diversity, equity, and inclusion? |
9 to >5.0 ptsFair
The response inaccurately or vaguely describes exactly what you did to explain the DNP project process at Walden University and includes the following information: What questions did the participants have and how did you respond? How did you and the organization identify possible gaps in practice or practice changes that might be addressed by the DNP project. Describe the gap or problem and cite two sources that justify the gap or problem in nursing. What approach (clinical practice guideline, staff education, quality improvement initiative) did you discuss to address a practice gap or practice change? What questions did the organization representatives have, and what were your responses? How does the proposed practice change support positive social change, diversity, equity, and inclusion? |
5 to >0 ptsPoor
The response inaccurately and vaguely describes exactly what you did to explain the DNP project process at Walden University and includes the following information: What questions did the participants have and how did you respond? How did you and the organization identify possible gaps in practice or practice changes that might be addressed by the DNP project. Describe the gap or problem and cite two sources that justify the gap or problem in nursing. What approach (clinical practice guideline, staff education, quality improvement initiative) did you discuss to address a practice gap or practice change? What questions did the organization representatives have, and what were your responses? How does the proposed practice change support positive social change, diversity, equity, and inclusion? |
|
15 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProject Team |
| 15 to >12.0 ptsFull Marks
The response accurately and comprehensively explains in detail the key stakeholders and potential team members e.g., organization leader, project mentor for a project to address a gap in practice or practice change. |
12 to >9.0 ptsGood
The response accurately explains the key stakeholders and potential team members e.g., organization leader, project mentor for a project to address a gap in practice or practice change. |
9 to >5.0 ptsFair
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the key stakeholders and potential team members e.g., organization leader, project mentor for a project to address a gap in practice or practice change. |
5 to >0 ptsPoor
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the key stakeholders and potential team members e.g., organization leader, project mentor for a project to address a gap in practice or practice change. |
|
15 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeNext Steps |
| 15 to >12.0 ptsFull Marks
The response accurately and comprehensively explains in detail the information that you provided to the organization regarding the next steps in the process including responses to the following questions: What questions were asked? What responses did you have? What decisions were made? |
12 to >9.0 ptsGood
The response accurately explains the information that you provided to the organization regarding the next steps in the process including responses to the following questions: What questions were asked? What responses did you have? What decisions were made? |
9 to >5.0 ptsFair
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the information that you provided to the organization regarding the next steps in the process including responses to the following questions: What questions were asked? What responses did you have? What decisions were made? |
5 to >0 ptsPoor
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the information that you provided to the organization regarding the next steps in the process including responses to the following questions: What questions were asked? What responses did you have? What decisions were made? |
|
15 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence |
| 15 to >12.0 ptsFull Marks
The response accurately and comprehensively explains in detail Three sources of current evidence (no older than five (5) years that support the project initiative. |
12 to >9.0 ptsGood
The response accurately explains three sources of current evidence (no older than five (5) years that support the project initiative. |
9 to >5.0 ptsFair
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains three sources of current evidence (no older than five (5) years that support the project initiative. |
5 to >0 ptsPoor
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains three sources of current evidence (no older than five (5) years that support the project initiative. |
|
15 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummary |
| 15 to >12.0 ptsFull Marks
The response accurately and comprehensively explains in detail the following: the strengths and weaknesses of the meeting. What would you have done differently? What additional information do you need before you meet with your faculty advisor in NURS 8702, project mentoring course. |
12 to >9.0 ptsGood
The response accurately explains the following: the strengths and weaknesses of the meeting. What would you have done differently? What additional information do you need before you meet with your faculty advisor in NURS 8702, project mentoring course. |
9 to >5.0 ptsFair
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the following: the strengths and weaknesses of the meeting. What would you have done differently? What additional information do you need before you meet with your faculty advisor in NURS 8702, project mentoring course. |
5 to >0 ptsPoor
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the following: the strengths and weaknesses of the meeting. What would you have done differently? What additional information do you need before you meet with your faculty advisor in NURS 8702, project mentoring course. |
|
15 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. |
| 5 to >4.0 ptsFull Marks
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria. |
4 to >3.5 ptsGood
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive. |
3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic. |
3 to >0 ptsPoor
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. |
|
5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation. |
| 5 to >4.0 ptsFull Marks
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. |
4 to >3.5 ptsGood
Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. |
3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair
Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. |
3 to >0 ptsPoor
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. |
|
5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. |
| 5 to >4.0 ptsFull Marks
Uses correct APA format with no errors. |
4 to >3.5 ptsGood
Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors. |
3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair
Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors. |
3 to >0 ptsPoor
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. |
|
5 pts |
| Total Points: 100 |
