NR 361 Week 8 Discussion: Reflection on AACN Essentials Informatics Self-Assessment

NR 361 Week 8 Discussion: Reflection on AACN Essentials Informatics Self-Assessment

NR 361 Week 8 Discussion: Reflection on AACN Essentials Informatics Self-Assessment

Discussion

Purpose

The purpose of this week’s reflection topic relates to the following Course Outcome (CO):

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO 8: Discuss the value of best evidence as a driving force to institute change in delivery of nursing care. (PO 8)

Due Date

Post a response to the initial discussion question by Wednesday 12/20 11:59pm MT.

Total Points Possible: 50 points

Preparing the Discussion

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NR 361 Week 8 Discussion: Reflection on AACN Essentials Informatics Self-Assessment HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

Reflection is an activity that involves your deep thought into your own experiences related to the concepts of the week. Answers should be detailed. In reflections students:

Demonstrate understanding of concepts for the week

Engage in meaningful dialogue with classmates and/or instructor

Express opinions clearly and logically, in a professional manner

Use the rubric on this page as you compose your answers.

Scholarly sources are NOT required for this reflection

Best Practices include:

Participation early in the week is encouraged to stimulate meaningful discussion among classmates and instructor.

Enter the reflection often during the week to read and learn from posts.

Select different classmates for your reply each week.

Reflection Question

Prior to posting your answer, complete the Week 8 AACN Essentials Self-Assessment

Links to an external site. linked here. Compare your scores from Week 1 to Week 8. Reflect on the following:

How far have you come?

How will you apply this information to continue to improve your informatics knowledge in nursing practice?

Grading

To view the grading criteria/rubric, please click on the 3 dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the discussion board title and then Show Rubric. See Syllabus for Grading Rubric Definitions.

RNBSN_50_Point_Discussion_Rubric_Wk8_1_21

RNBSN_50_Point_Discussion_Rubric_Wk8_1_21

Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Answer Post

•Answers the reflection question(s) in a detailed manner applying one or more weekly concept(s),

•Incorporates own experiences relating to weekly concept(s), and

• Compares scores from Week 1 to Week 8 Self-assessments.
28 pts

100% Excellent

Meets all criteria: •Answers the reflection question(s) in a detailed manner applying one or more weekly concept(s), •Incorporates own experiences relating to weekly concept(s), and • Compares scores from Week 1 to Week 8 Self-assessments.

25 pts

88% Good

Includes all three criteria but answer is not detailed.

22 pts

80% Fair

Meets two of three criteria

11 pts

38% Poor

Meets one of three criteria

0 pts
0% Missing

Does not answer the discussion question(s).

28 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Reply Post

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post by providing additional information or clarification. Reply post adds excellent depth to the discussion.

14 pts

100% Excellent

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post by providing additional information or clarification. Reply post adds excellent depth to the discussion.

12 pts

88% Good

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post by providing additional information or clarification. Reply post adds good depth to the discussion.

11 pts

80% Fair

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post. Limited information or clarification provided. Brief reply post adds fair depth to the discussion.

5 pts

38% Poor

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post. Reply does not provide additional information or clarification. Brief reply post does not add depth to the discussion.

0 pts

0% Missing

No reply post to classmates or instructor.

14 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Communicates Professionally

All posts are clear, concise, respectful, civil, and caring. Posts contain excellent English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.
8 pts

100% Excellent

All posts are clear, concise, respectful, civil, and caring. Posts contain excellent English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

7 pts

88% Good

All posts are clear, concise, respectful, civil, and caring. Posts contain good English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

6 pts

80% Fair

All posts are respectful, civil, and caring but are not clear or concise. Posts contain fair English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

3 pts

38% Poor

All posts are not clear and concise, AND contain poor English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

0 pts

0% Missing

All posts are not respectful, civil, and caring.
8 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Participation

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Saturday the end of the assigned week):

•Posts in the discussion at least two times, and

•Posts in the discussion on two different days
0 pts

No Points Deducted

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Saturday the end of the assigned week): •Posts in the discussion at least two times, and •Posts in the discussion on two different days

0 pts

Points Deducted (-5 Points)

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Saturday the end of the assigned week): •Does NOT post in the discussion at least two times AND/OR •Does NOT post in the discussion on two different days
0 pts

Total Points: 50

A Sample Of This Assignment Written By One Of Our Top-rated Writers

Reflection on AACN Essentials Informatics Self-Assessment

Nursing evolution is characterized by the progressive integration of technologies into patient care. To support nursing informatics and ensure high-quality care, nurses should be competent in diverse areas, including data collection, analysis, and application. They should also understand the ethical and safe use of healthcare technologies and adhere to the established standards and guidelines. My journey depicts gradual learning and improvement in various areas, such as using telecommunication technologies, securing patient care systems and technologies, using standardized terminology, and upholding ethical standards related to data security and other essentials. The massive improvement in informatics competencies implies that I am better positioned to use health systems, technologies, and tools to achieve high-quality care, drive data-driven practice, and evaluate outcomes. In this case, I will be more involved in promoting technology-centered nursing as healthcare delivery evolves multi-dimensionally.

To sustain positive outcomes in patient care, nurses should improve their skills and competencies as nursing advancement necessitates. I will apply the self-evaluation information to improve my informatics knowledge in nursing practice through increased use of technologies, continuous learning, and advocacy. For instance, the use of telehealth, electronic health records, mHealth apps, and patient portals improves nurses’ knowledge of workflow designs, data-centered care, and systems security. More use and interaction with such systems improve nurse’s confidence and skills regarding the safe, professional, and ethical application of technologies to optimize health outcomes. Continuous learning is crucial to improve informatics competencies in some areas, including policy development, application of safeguards, documentation, and data evaluation. It will enable me to acquire advanced skills in these areas to ensure I play a valuable role in nursing evolution as a practitioner, patient advocate, leader, and policymaker.