Assignment: Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project: PICOT Paper

Assignment: Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project: PICOT Paper

Assignment: Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project: PICOT Paper

Refer to the PICOT you developed for your evidence-based practice project proposal in the Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: PICOT assignment in Topic 3. If your PICOT required revision, include those revisions in this assignment. You will use your PICOT paper for all subsequent assignments you develop as part of your evidence-based practice project proposal in this course and in NUR-590, during which you will synthesize all of the sections into a final written paper detailing your evidence-based practice project proposal.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE Assignment: Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project: PICOT Paper
HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

Write a 750-1,000-word paper that describes your PICOT. Include the following:

Describe the population’s demographics and health concerns.

Describe the proposed evidence-based intervention and explain how your proposed intervention incorporates health policies and goals that support health care equity for the population of focus.

Compare your intervention to previous practice or research.

Explain what the expected outcome is for the intervention.

Describe the time for implementing the intervention and evaluating the outcome.

Explain how nursing science, social determinants of health, and epidemiologic, genomic, and genetic data are applied or synthesized to support population health management for the selected population.

Create an appendix for your paper and attach the PICOT. Be sure to review feedback from your previous submission and revise your PICOT accordingly.

Complete the “APA Writing Checklist,” located in Class Resources, to ensure that your paper adheres to APA style and formatting criteria and general guidelines for academic writing. Include the completed checklist as the final appendix at the end of your paper.

Refer to “Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal – Assignment Overview,” located in Class Resources, for an overview of the evidence-based practice project proposal assignments.

You are required to cite four to six peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:

MBA-MSN; MSN

4.1: Synthesize nursing science, determinants of health, and epidemiologic, genomic, and genetic data in the management of population health.

Skip to main contentEnable accessibility for visually impairedOpen the accessibility menuOpen the Accessible Navigation Menu

Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project: PICOT Paper – Rubric

LISTGRID

PRINT TO PDF

Rubric Criteria

Total150 points

Criterion

1. Unsatisfactory

2. Insufficient

3. Approaching

4. Acceptable

5. Target

Population Demographics and Health Concerns

Population Demographics and Health Concerns

0 points

The demographics and health concerns for the population are not described.
6 points

The demographics and health concerns for the population are incorrect or only partially described.
6.6 points

The demographics and health concerns for the population are summarized. More information and supporting evidence are needed.
6.9 points

The demographics and health concerns for the population are described using sufficient evidence.
7.5 points

The demographics and health concerns for the population are accurate and thoroughly described using substantial evidence.

Proposed Evidence-Based Intervention

Proposed Evidence-Based Intervention
0 points

The proposed evidence-based intervention is omitted.
15.6 points

The proposed evidence-based intervention is incomplete. It is unclear how the proposed intervention incorporates health policies and goals that support health care equity for the population of focus.

17.16 points

The proposed evidence-based intervention is outlined. Explanation of how the proposed intervention incorporates health policies and goals that support health care equity for the population of focus is general. Some aspects are unclear. More information is needed.
17.94 points

The proposed evidence-based intervention is described. Explanation of how the proposed intervention incorporates health policies and goals that support health care equity for the population of focus is adequate. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.
19.5 points

The proposed evidence-based intervention is well-developed and clearly described. Explanation of how the proposed intervention incorporates health policies and goals that support health care equity for the population of focus is thorough.

Comparison of Intervention to Current Research

Comparison of Intervention to Current Research
0 points

Comparison of intervention to previous practice or research is omitted.
14.4 points

Comparison of intervention to previous practice or research is incomplete.
15.84 points

Comparison of intervention to previous practice or research is generally presented. Some areas are vague.

16.56 points

Comparison of intervention to previous practice or research is adequately presented.
18 points

Comparison of intervention to previous practice or research is thorough and clearly presented.

Expected Outcome for Intervention

Expected Outcome for Intervention
0 points

The expected outcome is for the intervention is omitted.
12 points

The expected outcome is for the intervention is incomplete.
13.2 points

The expected outcome is for the intervention is summarized. More information and supporting evidence is needed.
13.8 points

The expected outcome for the intervention is explained using sufficient evidence.
15 points

The expected outcome for the intervention is thoroughly explained using substantial evidence.

Time Estimated for Implementing Intervention and Evaluating Outcome

Time Estimated for Implementing Intervention and Evaluating Outcome
0 points

A description of the timeline is not included.
12 points

A description of the timeline is incomplete or incorrect.
13.2 points

A description of the timeline is included but lacks evidence.
13.8 points

A description of the timelines is complete and includes a sufficient amount of evidence.

15 points

A description of the timeline is extremely thorough with substantial evidence.

Support (B) (B)

Support for Population Health Management for Selected Population (C 4.1) (C4.1)

0 points

Explanation of how nursing science; social determinants of health; and epidemiologic, genomic, and genetic data are applied or synthesized to support population health management for the selected population is omitted.
12 points

Explanation of how nursing science; social determinants of health; and epidemiologic, genomic, and genetic data are applied or synthesized to support population health management for the selected population is incomplete. There are major inaccuracies.
13.2 points

Explanation of how nursing science; social determinants of health; and epidemiologic, genomic, and genetic data are applied or synthesized to support population health management for the selected population is summarized. More information and support are needed.

13.8 points

Explanation of how nursing science; social determinants of health; and epidemiologic, genomic, and genetic data are applied or synthesized to support population health management for the selected population is adequate. Some detail is needed for accuracy or clarity.

15 points

Explanation of how nursing science; social determinants of health; and epidemiologic, genomic, and genetic data are applied or synthesized to support population health management for the selected population is thorough. The narrative is insightful and demonstrates an understanding of how the various aspects contribute to population health management for selected populations.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE Assignment: Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project: PICOT Paper
HERE

Appendix

Appendix

0 points

The appendix and required resources are omitted.
6 points

The APA Writing Checklist and PICOT are attached, but an appendix has not been created. The paper does not reflect the use of the APA Writing Checklist during development.
6.6 points

The APA Writing Checklist and PICOT are attached in the appendix. The APA Writing Checklist was generally used in development of the paper, but some aspects are inconsistent with the paper format or quality.
6.9 points

The APA Writing Checklist and PICOT are attached in the appendix. It is apparent that the APA Writing Checklist was used in development of the paper.

7.5 points

The APA Writing Checklist and PICOT are attached in the appendix. It is clearly evident by the quality of the paper that the APA Writing Checklist was used in development.

Required Sources

Required Sources
0 points

Sources are not included.
6 points

Number of required sources is only partially met.

6.6 points

Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate.
6.9 points

Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

7.5 points

Number of required resources is met. Sources are current and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

Thesis Position or Purpose

Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.
0 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident.

8.4 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.
9.24 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately developed. An awareness of the appropriate audience is demonstrated.
9.66 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific audience.

10.5 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is persuasively developed throughout and skillfully directed to a specific audience.

Development and Structure

Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development.
0 points

No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.
9.6 points

Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.

10.56 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
11.04 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and plausible conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

12 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is coherently and cohesively advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A convincing and unambiguous conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

Evidence

Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives.
0 points

Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of the writer.
6 points

Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other perspectives is present.

6.6 points

Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.

6.9 points

Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Other perspectives are integrated.

7.5 points

Comprehensive and compelling evidence is included. Multiple other perspectives are integrated effectively.

Mechanics of Writing

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.

0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

6 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

6.6 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

6.9 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

7.5 points

No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

Format/Documentation

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.
0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
6 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.

6.6 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.
6.9 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
7.5 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.