Assignment: NR506NP Week 3 Forum Policy and Leadership 

Assignment: NR506NP Week 3 Forum Policy and Leadership 

Assignment: NR506NP Week 3 Forum Policy and Leadership 

Title of Paper (Centered, Bold, Upper & Lower Case)

Patient Interventions (Level 1 Heading: Centered, Bold, Title Case Heading)

Intervention One (Level 2 Heading: Flush Left, Bold, Title Case Heading) (Title with Name of Intervention)

Patient interventions should be evidenced-based. Discuss in detail your first patient intervention. Use a valid and relevant scholarly source to cite your evidenced-based intervention. Paraphrase the content you are using from your resource and cite correctly. Include how you will measure this intervention.

BUY A CUSTOM PAPER HERE ON; Assignment NR506NP Week 3 Forum Policy and Leadership 

Intervention Two (Level 2 Heading)

Discuss in detail your second patient intervention. Use a valid and relevant scholarly source to cite your evidenced-based intervention. Paraphrase the content you are using from your resource and cite correctly. Include how you will measure this intervention.

Intervention Three (Level 2 Heading)

Discuss in detail your third patient intervention. Use a valid and relevant scholarly source to cite your evidenced-based intervention. Paraphrase the content you are using from your resource and cite correctly. Include how you will measure this intervention.

Improved Patient Outcomes (Level 1 Heading)

Discuss how your selected interventions presented above will result in improved patient outcomes. Use a valid and relevant scholarly source to cite your evidenced-based intervention. Paraphrase the content you are using from your resource and cite correctly.

 Cost Savings (Level 1 Heading)

Discuss how your selected interventions presented above will result in cost savings for the practice. Use a valid and relevant scholarly source to cite your evidenced-based intervention. Paraphrase the content you are using from your resource and cite correctly.

Patient Ratings (Level 1 Heading)

Discuss how your selected interventions presented above will result in improved patient ratings. Describe how the selected interventions will increase patient satisfaction. Patient ratings include how satisfied the patients are and how they rate NP performance. Use a valid and relevant scholarly source to cite your evidenced-based intervention. Paraphrase the content you are using from your resource and cite correctly.

Conclusion

A conclusion paragraph is required to end an APA paper. This paragraph will summarize the paper for the reader. A good rule of thumb is to have a sentence for each main idea you discussed in the paper.

References

Please make sure you to review the 7^th edition APA book to cite your references here. Please note: you do not list a reference unless you cited the reference in your paper.

Assignment: NR506NP Week 3 Forum Policy and Leadership Sample

Forum Policy and Leadership

Medication management and care coordination is a profound measure of the effectiveness of the care domain. According to the National Committee for Quality Assure (NCQA, 2018), about 82% of American adults take at least one medication, including prescribed and nonprescribed regimens, mineral, herbal, or natural supplements. On the other hand, about 29% of all adults take five or more medications. It is essential to note that the widespread use of prescription medications can result in multiple ramifications, including the effects of non-adherence to medications, errors, and polypharmacy when effective care coordination and medication management interventions are insufficient. As a result, this paper elaborates on three patient interventions for medication management and care coordination, how they can result in improved patient outcomes and care cost savings, and how they improve NP patient ratings.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE ON;NR506NP Week 3 Forum Policy and Leadership Assignment

Patient Interventions for Medication Management and Care Coordination

Post-discharge Medical Reconciliation

Medical reconciliation entails maintaining correct lists of prescribed and non-prescribed medications to ease adherence and eliminate the likelihood of errors and issues like polypharmacy. According to Alanazi et al. (2022), providing the patients with information regarding medications before discharge is an essential step for safeguarding patient safety and avoiding discrepancies or inconsistencies in patients’ medications during transitions and at the time of discharge. Notably, medication reconciliation is a profound approach to improving adherence to treatment options for patients with severe conditions, especially older adults who face challenges in comprehending medical instructions (Alanazi et al., 2022). Eventually, this strategy can eliminate errors and the subsequent consequences of non-adherence to medications.

Monitoring and Follow-up to Respond to the Changes in Patient’s Needs

The primary objective of coordinating care is to incorporate patients’ needs, values, and preferences when delivering high-quality, value-based care. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ, 2018) contends that care coordination enables healthcare professionals to communicate patients’ needs and preferences and apply this information to guide effective patient-centered care. One strategy for ensuring patients’ needs assessment and response mechanisms is nurse-led monitoring and follow-up on patients’ care interventions. Shen et al. (2017) argue that post-discharge follow-up and monitoring resonate with a lower risk for 30-day readmission for patients on the medicine service. In this sense, healthcare professionals can assist patients in implementing self-care interventions and reviewing medication instructions.

Discharge Education Program Using a Teach-back Method

Undoubtedly, educating patients before discharging them is an effective strategy for promoting care coordination, enhancing care planning, and improving patients’ knowledge of health expectations. According to Oh et al. (2021), implementing educational interventions by applying the teach-back method can improve knowledge, and adherence to medication interventions, bolster self-efficacy and enhance self-care skills. Eventually, enhanced knowledge of self-management approaches is profound in reducing readmission rates and improving patient outcomes.

How to Implement the Intervention and Measure the Outcomes

Implementing medication reconciliation entails various strategies, including verifying medications, updating health records, comparing lists, and communicating the list to patients and relevant caregivers (Kreckman et al., 2018). On the other hand, implementing monitoring and follow-up activities entails planning and settling on schedules for visiting patients and holding consultations with healthcare professionals. It should be a consensus decision based on proper timing and collective goal setting. Finally, educating patients before discharging them is an effective strategy for promoting their comprehension of self-care interventions. According to Oh et al. (2021), using the teach-back method in implementing patient education enable patients to understand medical instructions and promote their awareness of health expectations after transitioning to different care settings.

The desired outcomes of the three patient-centered interventions are promoting patients’ awareness of self-care interventions, bolstering their ability to adhere to medications, and reducing the rate of readmissions and concerns like polypharmacy. As a result, it is possible to evaluate these outcomes by assessing patients’ awareness of medication or treatment options, evaluating the rates of readmissions before and after interventions, and testing patients’ conformity to prescribed and nonprescribed medications.

How These Primary Care Interventions Result in Improved Patient Outcomes and Health Care Cost Savings

Undeniably, the three primary care interventions can result in multiple benefits, including improving patient outcomes and reducing care costs. For instance, post-discharge medication reconciliation emerges as a profound approach for enabling accurate medication record-keeping and preventing medical errors. As a result, it helps in curtailing the costs of addressing the consequences of medication errors, including re-hospitalization (Alanazi et al., 2022). Secondly, monitoring and follow-up activities are equally essential in promoting patient safety, improving care outcomes, and reducing the cost of care. According to Shen et al. (2017), follow-up activities can reduce readmissions, especially for patients with chronic conditions such as heart disease and diabetes. In this sense, frequently visiting patients and monitoring their progress enable healthcare professionals to review medication instructions and address any emerging needs.

Reducing readmissions is an ideal strategy for curtailing the economic burden of prolonged hospitalization. Finally, educating patients before discharging them can promote care transition and enhance self-care interventions. Oh, et al. (2021) argue that patient education is vital in improving self-efficacy, promoting medication adherence, and enhancing patients’ ability to comprehend treatment options. Eventually, enhanced knowledge of medication and self-management approaches can reduce errors and improve patients’ health and wellness.

How These Interventions Result in Improved NP Patient Ratings

Patient ratings entail various determinants of care quality, including patient satisfaction and medical outcomes. It is essential to note that nursing practitioners are responsible for ensuring patient satisfaction and improving medical outcomes by implementing evidence-based, patient-centered care interventions. According to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ, 2018), care coordination is a profound strategy the has potential to improve the effectiveness, safety, and efficiency of the American healthcare system. In this sense, targeted care coordination activities such as medication management, monitoring and follow-up, effective communication, and supporting patients’ self-management goals can improve outcomes for patients, providers, and payers.

The three primary interventions for medication management and care coordination can promote patient satisfaction and improve their health outcomes. According to Oh et al. (2021), patient education can result in self-efficacy and patients’ satisfaction with medication interventions, enabling caregivers to address issues such as polypharmacy. On the other hand, involving patients in monitoring and follow-up activities, alongside medication reconciliation approaches is a viable option for improving their knowledge of care interventions and curtailing the cost associated with readmissions. Eventually, nursing practitioners’ responsibility for implementing these interventions can receive positive patient ratings due to their ability to promote care coordination and ensure patient satisfaction.

Conclusion

Undoubtedly, medication management and care coordination is a profound measure of care effectiveness since it entails deliberate activities of organizing patient care interventions and sharing information among stakeholders to enhance safer and more effective care. It is essential to promote care coordination and proper medication management by implementing post-discharge medication reconciliation, developing a plan for monitoring and follow-up activities, and educating patients before discharging them. Eventually, these interventions result in improved outcomes and reduced care costs by reducing readmissions and enabling patients to implement self-care interventions. As a result, nursing practitioners in charge of implementing these measures can obtain positive patient ratings due to their ability to promote positive outcomes and avert issues like readmissions and non-adherence to medications.

References

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2018, August). Care coordination. https://www.ahrq.gov/ncepcr/care/coordination.html

Alanazi, A. S., Awwad, S., Khan, T. M., Asdaq, S. M. B., Mohzari, Y., Alanazi, F., Alrashed, A., Alamri, A. S., Alsanie, W. F., Alhomrani, M., & AlMotairi, M. (2022). Medication reconciliation on discharge in a tertiary care Riyadh hospital: An observational study. PLOS ONE, 17(3), e0265042. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265042

National Committee for Quality Assurance. (2018). HEDIS measures and technical resources. https://www.ncqa.org/hedis/measures/

Oh, E. G., Lee, H. J., Yang, Y. L., Lee, S., & Kim, Y. M. (2021). Development of a discharge education program using the teach-back method for heart failure patients. BMC Nursing, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00622-2

Shen, E., Koyama, S. Y., Huynh, D. N., Watson, H. L., Mittman, B., Kanter, M. H., & Nguyen, H. Q. (2017). Association of a dedicated post–hospital discharge follow-up visits and 30-day readmission risk in a Medicare advantage population. JAMA Internal Medicine, 177(1), 132. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.7061