Module 2 Discussion: Critically Appraise a Qualitative and Quantitative Research Design

Module 2 Discussion: Critically Appraise a Qualitative and Quantitative Research Design

Module 2 Discussion: Critically Appraise a Qualitative and Quantitative Research Design

Critically appraise a qualitative and quantitative research design.

Submission Instructions:

Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE Module 2 Discussion: Critically Appraise a Qualitative and Quantitative Research Design HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per response.)

All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.

You can expect feedback from the instructor within 48 to 72 hours from the Sunday due date.

null

Grading Rubric

Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

Discussion Rubric
Criteria Ratings Points

Identification of Main Issues, Problems, and Concepts
Distinguished – 5 points

Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues, problems, and concepts.
Excellent – 4 points

Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts.
Fair – 2 points

Identifies and demonstrate an acceptable understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts.
Poor – 1 point

Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts.

5 points

Use of Citations, Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines

Distinguished – 3 points

Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing. High level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors.
Excellent – 2 points

Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. Moderate level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors.

Fair – 1 point

Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.

Poor – 0 points

Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.

3 points
Response to Posts of Peers

Distinguished – 2 points

Student constructively responded to two other posts and either extended, expanded or provided a rebuttal to each.
Fair – 1 point

Student constructively responded to one other post and either extended, expanded or provided a rebuttal.

Poor – 0 points

Student provided no response to a peer’s post.

2 points
Total Points 10