NR 707A Week 3 Assignment: Professional Poster

NR 707A Week 3 Assignment: Professional Poster

NR 707A Week 3 Assignment: Professional Poster

Assignment

Purpose

The purpose of this activity is for students to create a professional poster to disseminate their DNP evidence-based practice change project through a poster presentation at a national conference. This progressive poster assignment begins in NR707 and is completed in NR709.

Instructions

Create your poster using the Professional Poster Template located in the Project & Practicum Forms section of the DNP Resources page. Scroll down to select the right poster for this assignment titled: NR 707_DNP Professional Poster Template 6.24.22.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NR 707A Week 3 Assignment: Professional Poster HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

Insert your content into the text boxes for each section; make sure to remove the instructions on the template. The content should be well-developed, concisely conveyed, and supported by the evidence. Leave space between each section without words, so that there is a space break between sections.

Set up your poster using the following format and guidelines.

Layout & Organization

Visual Presentation

Your poster sections are required to have the exact sections and headers as the NR707 Poster template and in the same order. Use the following template headings

Practice Problem

Practice Question

Methodology

Results

Implications

Conclusions

References

The Results and Conclusion sections should be blank. (Case Study students also leave the Methodology section blank.)

The poster should convey the practice change project concisely and accurately to enhance reader comprehension.

Read the poster from another person’s point of view to ensure that the information you entered describes your practice change project concisely and flows logically.

Include the following in your poster:

Practice Problem

Offer strong evidence-based statements for the significance data, including prevalence, and/or incidence, and/or mortality data at the national and state (or county or city) levels. If available, include data from the practicum site to support this is a priority problem for the organization.

Include the project aim (main purpose or objective) at the end of this section.

Include in-text citations.

Use bullet points for practice problem data points. Bullet points are not required for project aim.

Use concise and accurate statements.

Practice Question

The practice question must be the exact approved PICOT practice question as identified in the Chamberlain University IRB approval letter.

Remove the name or identifiers of the practicum site from the practice question and other sections of the poster.

Methodology (Part 1 and Part 2 in the Rubric) (Students conducting the case study should leave this blank.)

In this section, students who are implementing at the practicum site are required to state the information in short concise phrases with bullet points. Use the exact subheaders listed on the NR 707 poster template.

State the translational science model or theory/change model.

Provide a short description of the setting.

Provide a short description of the population with the estimated number of participants.

Briefly state the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Briefly describe the intervention (cite primary source)

Briefly describe the formative evaluation plan.

Briefly describe the summative evaluation plan.

State the main outcome in the PICOT practice question.

Briefly describe the data collection (e.g., pre-intervention and post-intervention data collection).

State the name of the data collection instrument (cite source) OR data source (e.g., data extraction from chart or EHR, or data from the quality department, etc.).

State the data analysis plan (descriptive statistics or statistical test if consulting with a statistician).

State the exact timeframe for the total implementation and the intervention implementation.

Results: (LEAVE BLANK)

Conclusion: (LEAVE BLANK)

Implications for Nursing and Healthcare

Briefly state your anticipated implications for changing patient, nursing practice, and organizational outcomes. The anticipated outcomes should be based on the research supporting your intervention. Implications should be explained for each system level below:

Micro (patient or individual nurse outcomes)

Meso (unit or department collective nursing practice)

Macro (facility or healthcare system[s])

Use a bullet point for each implication.

Do not include the terms Micro, Meso, Macro in the bullet points (cover the concepts)

References: Use of Scientific Evidence

Every reference is required to be associated with an in-text citation.

The poster includes at least three (3) references; research articles (primary research or systematic reviews) or data from a government or nationally-recognized healthcare organization related to the DNP project in citations and references. Avoid secondary or summary sources.

References must be published in the past 5 years.

References and in-text citations are required to be in correct APA format, excluding the hanging indent (which PowerPoint may not enable).

Program Competencies

This assignment enables the student to meet the following program competencies:

Integrates scientific underpinnings into everyday clinical practice. (POs 3, 5)

Applies organizational and system leadership skills to affect systemic changes in corporate culture and to promote continuous improvement in clinical outcomes. (PO 6)

Uses analytic methods to translate critically appraised research and other evidence into clinical scholarship for innovative practice improvements. (POs 3, 5)

Appraises current information systems and technologies to improve health care. (POs 6, 7)
Analyzes health care policies to advocate for equitable health care and social justice to all populations and those at risk due to social determinants of health. (POs 2, 9)
Creates a supportive organizational culture for flourishing collaborative teams to facilitate clinical disease prevention and promote population health at all system levels. (PO 8)

Leads others in professional identity, advanced clinical judgment, systems thinking, resilience, and accountability in selecting, implementing, and evaluating clinical care. (POs 1, 4)

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
Demonstrate effective project management strategies. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5; POs 2, 3, 6)

Explore possible career trajectories for the DNP-prepared nurse and the contributions to healthcare to be achieved through those career options. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5; POs 2, 3, 6)

Demonstrate knowledge and skills in support for and dissemination of scholarship. (PCs 1, 3, 5; POs 2, 3)

Use project management processes to implement the DNP project. (PCs 6, 8; POs 4, 8)

Due Date

By 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday

Late Assignment Policy applies

Rubric

Week 3 Assignment Grading Rubric
Week 3 Assignment Grading Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLayout and Organization

Requirements:

1. The poster has the exact sections and headers in the exact columns as the template provided and in the same order as below:

-Practice Problem

-Practice Question

-Methodology

-Implications

-Results

-Conclusions

-References

2. The Results and Conclusion sections are blank. (Case Study students: Also leave the methodology section blank.)

3. The poster conveys the project concisely and accurately.
30 pts

Excellent or Highest Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and provides excellent layout and organization.

27 pts

Good or High Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a sufficient layout and organization.

24 pts

Acceptable or Basic Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial layout and organization.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Provides an undeveloped or poor layout and organization.
30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVisual Presentation

Requirements:

1. The poster is free of spelling, grammar, spacing, and punctuation errors.

2. The poster title is 60-72 font size; text is centered and capitalized. The title is limited to 12 words or less; all words are fully spelled out (no acronyms or abbreviations.)

3. Name and credentials are 32-36 font size; text is centered.

4. The headings are 32-40 font size.

5. The text in each section is 24-32; and should be consistent across the entire poster (except the Reference section can be smaller).

6. Font type should be Arial, Calibri, or Times New Roman and should be consistent across the entire poster.

7. Font size in Reference section can be smaller than the other sections but needs to be legible.

8. There is an empty space between each section.

9. Colors adhere to the template provided.

10. No clip art or pictures are in the poster.

11. Text is not hanging off the poster template.

12. All instructions on the poster template have been removed.
20 pts

Excellent or Highest Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and provides an excellent visual poster presentation.

18 pts

Good or High Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a sufficient visual poster presentation.

16 pts

Acceptable or Basic Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial visual poster presentation.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and demonstrates a poor partial visual poster presentation.

20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePractice Problem and Project Aim (Purpose)

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NR 707A Week 3 Assignment: Professional Poster HERE

Requirements:

1. Provide the significance data, including prevalence, and/or incidence, and/or mortality data at the national and state (or county or city) levels.

2. Include in-text citation(s).

3. Use bullet points for each entry (except the project aim).

4. Use concise and accurate statements.

5. The project aim is a succinct and complete statement of what the intervention will change- your desired outcome.

30 pts

Excellent or Highest Level of Performance

Includes all data requirements and provides an in-depth and also concise practice problem section. The project aim statement is concise and robust.

27 pts

Good or High Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a sufficient discussion of the practice problem and the project aim.

24 pts

Acceptable or Basic Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial discussion of the practice problem and/or the project aim.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Provides an undeveloped discussion of the practice problem and the project aim.

30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePractice Question

Requirements:

1. The practice question must be the exact approved PICOT practice question as identified in the Chamberlain University IRB approval letter.

2. The name or identifiers of the practicum site are removed from the practice question and other sections of the poster.

20 pts

Excellent or Highest Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and includes the practice question from the IRB approval letter.

18 pts

Good or High Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a sufficient practice question from the IRB approval letter.

16 pts

Acceptable or Basic Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial practice question.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or an undeveloped practice question.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMethodology Part 1 (Implementation students only)

Requirements:

1. Use the exact bulleted subheaders listed on the NR707 poster template. Complete the content with short, concise phrases.

2. State the translational science model or theory/change model.

3. State a short description of the setting.

4. Provide a short description of the population with an estimate of the number of participants.

5. Briefly state the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

6. Briefly describe the intervention (with primary citation).
30 pts

Excellent or Highest Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and provides an accurate and concise methodology section.

27 pts

Good or High Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a sufficient methodology section.

24 pts

Acceptable or Basic Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial methodology section.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Provides an undeveloped methodology section.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMethodology Part 2 (Implementation students only)

Requirements:

1. Use the exact bulleted subheaders listed on the NR707 poster template. Complete the content with short, concise phrases.

2. Briefly state the formative evaluation plan.

3. Briefly state the summative evaluation plan.

4. Briefly state the main outcome from the PICOT practice question.

5. Briefly describe the data collection (e.g., pre-intervention and post-intervention data collection).

6. State the name of the data collection instrument (with primary citation) OR data source.

7. Briefly describe the data analysis plan.

8. State the exact timeframe for the total implementation and the intervention implementation.
30 pts

Excellent or Highest Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and provides an accurate and concise methodology section.

27 pts

Good or High Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a sufficient methodology section.

24 pts

Acceptable or Basic Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial methodology section.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Provides an undeveloped methodology section.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeImplications

Requirements:

1. Implications should be explained in a brief statement for each system level below.

a. Micro (patient or individual nurse outcomes)

b. Meso (unit or department collective nursing practice)

c. Macro (facility or healthcare system[s])

2. Use a bullet point for each implication.

3. Avoid including the terms Micro, Meso, Macro in the bullets (cover the concepts)

20 pts

Excellent or Highest Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and provides an accurate and concise implications discussion.

18 pts

Good or High Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a sufficient implications discussion.

16 pts

Acceptable or Basic Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial implications discussion.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Provides an undeveloped implications discussion.

20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferences

Requirements:

1. Every reference has an in-text citation.

2. At least 3 references are included; research articles (primary research or systematic reviews) or data from a government or nationally-recognized healthcare organization.

3. Summary and secondary sources are avoided.

4. References must be published within the past 5 years.

5. References and in-text citations are required to be in correct APA format, excluding the hanging indent (which PowerPoint may not enable).

20 pts

Excellent or Highest Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and provides excellent use of scientific evidence and reference section.

18 pts

Good or High Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides sufficient use of scientific evidence and reference section.

16 pts

Acceptable or Basic Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides partial use of scientific evidence and reference section.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Provides undeveloped use of scientific evidence and reference section.
20 pts

Total Points: 200

PreviousNext