NR 709 Full Course Discussions & Assignments (Week 1-7)

NR 709 Full Course Discussions & Assignments (Week 1-7)

NR 709 Full Course Discussions & Assignments (Week 1-7)

NR 709A Week 1 Discussion: Data Collection, Management, and Project Update
Purpose

The purpose of this discussion is to examine the data you have collected, analyzed, and are using to evaluate the effectiveness of your DNP practice change project.

Instructions

Reflect on your readings this week and respond to the following in 150 words or less:

Describe your plan for data analysis. Attach any tool that you are using for your project evaluation.

Explain and appraise how you will evaluate your project outcome.

Please click on the following link to review the DNP Discussion Guidelines on the Student Resource Center program page:

Link (webpage): DNP Discussion GuidelinesLinks to an external site.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NR 709 Full Course Discussions & Assignments (Week 1-7) HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

Program Competencies

This discussion enables the student to meet the following program competencies:

Integrates scientific underpinnings into everyday clinical practice. (POs 3, 5)

Applies organizational and system leadership skills to affect systemic changes in corporate culture and to promote continuous improvement in clinical outcomes. (PO 6)

Uses analytic methods to translate critically appraised research and other evidence into clinical scholarship for innovative practice improvements. (POs 3, 5)

Appraises current information systems and technologies to improve health care. (POs 6, 7)

NR 709A Week 2 Discussion: Implications of the DNP Practice Change Project on Nursing and Healthcare Outcomes

Purpose

The purpose of this discussion is to explore the implications of the DNP practice change project on nursing and healthcare outcomes.

Instructions

Reflect on your readings this week and respond to the following in 150 words or less:

Describe and evaluate the influence of your DNP practice change project on the stakeholders at your practicum site.

Examine the implications of your DNP practice change project on nursing and healthcare outcomes.

Describe and appraise how data-driven decision-making will be used to determine the sustainability or extension of your DNP practice change project.

Please click on the following link to review the DNP Discussion Guidelines on the Student Resource Center program page:

Link (webpage): DNP Discussion GuidelinesLinks to an external site.

Program Competencies

This discussion enables the student to meet the following program competencies:

Integrates scientific underpinnings into everyday clinical practice. (POs 3, 5)

Applies organizational and system leadership skills to affect systemic changes in corporate culture and to promote continuous improvement in clinical outcomes. (PO 6)

Uses analytic methods to translate critically appraised research and other evidence into clinical scholarship for innovative practice improvements. (POs 3, 5)

Appraises current information systems and technologies to improve health care. (POs 6, 7)

Creates a supportive organizational culture for flourishing collaborative teams to facilitate clinical disease prevention and promote population health at all system levels. (PO 8)

Leads others in professional identity, advanced clinical judgment, systems thinking, resilience, and accountability in selecting, implementing, and evaluating clinical care. (POs 1, 4)

Course Outcomes

This discussion enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

Evaluate the outcomes of your DNP project using narrative and statistical methods. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4; POs 3, 5, 6) 

Develop a comprehensive plan for communicating the results of the evaluation of the DNP project for determination of sustainability and replication. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4; POs 5, 6)

Use project management processes to implement the DNP project. (PCs 6, 8; POs 4, 8)

NR 709A Week  3 Discussion: Professional Support and Collaboration

Purpose

The purpose of this discussion is to identify and evaluate individuals who provided professional support and mentoring throughout your DNP program. These individuals may include your preceptor, mentor, course faculty, or others who assisted you in finding the right direction in your course work, practice change project, and practicum experience.

Instructions

Reflect on your readings this week and respond to the following in 150 words or less:

Identify 2-3 individuals who provided professional support, mentoring, or who helped guide you throughout your DNP degree program and/or during your DNP practice change project design, development, implementation, and evaluation.

Evaluate the influence that intraprofessional or interprofessional collaboration with the individuals you identified had on your success in the DNP degree program.

Please click on the following link to review the DNP Discussion Guidelines on the Student Resource Center program page:

Link (webpage): DNP Discussion GuidelinesLinks to an external site.

Program Competencies

This discussion enables the student to meet the following program competencies:

Integrates scientific underpinnings into everyday clinical practice. (POs 3, 5)
Applies organizational and system leadership skills to affect systemic changes in corporate culture and to promote continuous improvement in clinical outcomes. (PO 6)

Uses analytic methods to translate critically appraised research and other evidence into clinical scholarship for innovative practice improvements. (POs 3, 5)

Appraises current information systems and technologies to improve health care. (POs 6, 7)

Creates a supportive organizational culture for flourishing collaborative teams to facilitate clinical disease prevention and promote population health at all system levels. (PO 8)

Leads others in professional identity, advanced clinical judgment, systems thinking, resilience, and accountability in selecting, implementing, and evaluating clinical care. (POs 1, 4)

Course Outcomes

This discussion enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

Develop a comprehensive plan for communicating the results of the evaluation of the DNP project for determination of sustainability and replication. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4; POs 5, 6)

Use project management processes to implement the DNP project. (PCs 6 8; POs 4, 8)

NR 709A Week  4 Assignment 1: Final DNP Project Manuscript

Week 4Final DNP Project Manuscript

Assignment 1

Purpose

For this assignment, you will complete the implementation and evaluation portions of the DNP project and submit the completed Final DNP Project Manuscript. This cumulative assignment is a revision and extension of the approved project proposal, evidence-based intervention, and synthesis of the literature developed in NR702 and NR705, respectively. The completed Final DNP Project Manuscript will provide a detailed account of all phases of the completed DNP project and will be completed on the approved Final DNP Project Manuscript Template.

Instructions

Use the DNP Project Manuscript Template in the current APA format. Start with your revised DNP Project Manuscript from NR702 and NR705. Complete all the edits requested by faculty, and add the sections and appendices as described below.

Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the assignment. After submitting your Final DNP Project Manuscript by the due date, and receiving feedback from your course faculty, you will have the opportunity to revise and resubmit your manuscript one time and your manuscript will then be graded. After receiving feedback from your course faculty, the revised manuscript must be returned to your course faculty in seven (7) days. Contact your course faculty if you have questions.

This final paper is an extension of the DNP Project Manuscript completed in NR702 and NR705, respectively.

The Final DNP Project Manuscript will be graded on the quality of information, use of citations, use of Standard English grammar, sentence structure, and overall organization based on the required components as summarized in the directions and grading criteria/rubric.

You are required to use the DNP Project Template that was started in NR702 and expanded upon in NR705.

Complete all the requested revisions to your DNP Project Manuscript from your faculty in NR702 and NR705 before starting the work on the NR709 Final DNP Project Manuscript.

Use doctoral-level writing with evidence of extensive use of writing resources to enhance the manuscript presentation.

The sections included in the Final DNP Project Manuscript are covered in specific detail within the rubric. Review the grading rubric carefully and consider incorporating each required criterion into the final paper.

Revisions to the manuscript based on NR702 and NR705 faculty feedback are required.

Abstract

The abstract includes all required content in 150 – 200 words (no more than one page).

The abstract is structured by the required subheadings: Background, Problem, Methods, Intervention, Results, Conclusion, and Keywords. The word Keywords is indented and in italics; the actual keywords are in regular font.

The Final DNP Project is effectively summarized.

No citations are used in the abstract.

The abstract is double-spaced.

Title, Introduction, and Background

Bold the title.

The title should inform and engage the reader.

The title should include your population, intervention, and/or outcome.

The title should be concise (no more than 12 words) and contain fully spelled-out words with no abbreviations.

Place the title of your project as the heading of this section. The title is bold and centered. 

Start the introduction with a powerful statement or two to stimulate the interest of your reader.

Explicitly state that the DNP Project Manuscript concerns an evidence-based intervention to improve healthcare outcomes. Improving healthcare should include variables of quality, safety, effectiveness, patient-centeredness, timeliness, cost, efficiency, and/or equity, and it should include referenced statistics. 

Explicitly state the practice problem and the purpose (aim) of the project.

Identify the main sections of the paper to preview what the paper will include. 

Problem

Articulate the issue clearly and succinctly and its significance (incidence, prevalence, and/or mortality data) from a global, national, and local perspective. Then, conclude by discussing the problem within the practicum site. (3 paragraphs)

Examine the global or worldwide prevalence, healthcare costs, and impact (mortality and/or other data) of the problem.

Examine the global impact on nurses, quality of care, healthcare organizations, safety, society and/or social justice considerations as relevant to the project problem.

Describe the national prevalence, healthcare costs, and impact (mortality and/or other data) of the problem.

Analyze the national impact on nurses, quality of care, healthcare organizations, safety, and society/social justice considerations as relevant to the project problem.

Explain the problem at the practicum site. (If available and applicable, examine the incidence, prevalence, and financial impact.)

Examine the practicum site’s impact on nurses, quality of care, safety, social justice, and the healthcare organization.

Describe what the practicum site has done to address the problem, or state that there is no evidence that the problem has been addressed.

Project Aim and Supporting Objectives

Explain the specific overall aim of the project.

Identify 3-4 measurable objectives of the project that supported the aim.

Place the objectives in a sequenced format (a)…, (b)…., (c)…., etc.

Practice Question

Under this primary heading, include a one-sentence practice question.

Begin this section with a lead-in sentence such as, “The following practice question served as the basis for the DNP project:”

Research Synthesis and Evidence-Based Intervention (4 Parts)

Part 1: The Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool

Before writing the synthesis, complete the Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool.

Enter a minimum of 10 (or more) research articles supporting the evidence-based intervention in the table.

Enter the correct information in each column (Appendix A in the DNP Project Manuscript Template).

Part 2: Brief Description of Intervention and Endorsement and Part 3: Themes of Research Evidence 

Begin this section with the name and brief description of the evidence-based intervention.

Identify the national organization or government agency that endorses the intervention, if applicable.

Start the synthesis section with a statement of how many articles are included that support the intervention related to the population and the outcomes of your project.

The synthesis section must include at least 10 articles supporting the intervention.

The articles must be 5 years old or less or seminal research.

The sources should be evidence-based, peer-reviewed research articles.

The synthesis may include both quantitative and qualitative research studies and national standards or guidelines.

In a brief summary statement, provide the numbers of research articles that are level I, II, and III and give a summary of the quality of the research articles.

Identify the main themes that emerge from the sources and describe how the intervention has been utilized to solve a similar problem.

Explain the differences (contrast the main points) in the research articles.

Present an objective overarching synthesis of research statement supporting the evidence-based intervention.

Part 4: Detailed Sequence of the Intervention

Provide an in-depth and exact explanation of the evidence-based intervention you implemented. Describe the intervention exactly as the intervention was implemented in the research articles and include the specific key details.

Use the research articles to create a detailed discussion describing each of the steps in the intervention implementation. The evidence-based intervention should be implemented as described in the research, with all the original authors’ intended components.

Describe in detail how each participant engaged with the intervention from beginning to end of the intervention. This should be so detailed that someone else who has never heard of your project can pick up your intervention description and implement this exactly as you described.

Methodology

Organizational Setting

Provide a detailed description of the setting for the project, including the following:

State the type of healthcare setting or community setting.

Describe the location.

Explain the typical patient and typical diagnoses.

Identify how many patients or participants are seen monthly and, if applicable, state the average length of stay.

Describe the interdisciplinary care team that contributes to the patient’s health management and outcomes.

Population

Describe the details of your specific project population.

Provide the final number of participants.

Explain inclusion and exclusion criteria for the project.

Describe how you enrolled the participants and if informed consent was needed.

Translational Science Model and Project Management Plan

Identify the theory or model that served as the framework for the project; translational science models are recommended.

Identify the primary concepts or steps of the model and how they applied to your project design.

Create the steps in your DNP practice change project that coincide with the theoretical concepts.

Include the timeframe for each step in your project plan (e.g., “in week 1, the data before intervention implementation was collected”). Describe the project management plan by starting with the timeline of weeks for the project (usual projects are 8-12 weeks, keeping in mind the requirement to implement the intervention for at least eight weeks).

The implementation plan must include a full eight weeks of intervention implementation.

Include the plan for the pre- and post-summative data collection.

Include the weekly plan for the formative evaluation to ensure high intervention fidelity. Develop a week-to-week formative evaluation plan utilizing observation, 1:1 discussions, huddles, leadership meetings, or other processes to describe your project management oversight during implementation.

For each step or activity in the intervention plan, identify the intervention week in which that activity occurred.

Plans for Sustainability

Create your detailed plan to sustain the project over time.

Identify the specific strategies used to ensure the project has ongoing evaluation and modification as needed to ensure its success after your implementation phase is complete.

Barriers, Facilitators and Ethical Considerations

Assess barriers and state how you overcame these obstacles.

Assess the facilitators and ways support was leveraged.

Evaluate changes with leadership that impacted the project.

Analyze ethical considerations and how private health information and/or data was collected.

State the IRB requirements from the university and practicum site.

Explain if there was a need for informed consent or assent.

Data Collection and Analysis Plan

Create your detailed data collection plan with a description of how you collected data and when.

If a retrospective chart audit was used, explain how you collected pre- and post-intervention data.

If a data collection instrument or tool was used, describe the instrument or tool and provide validity and reliability for this tool with a citation and matching reference.

Was permission to use the instrument or tool required? If so, state that you have permission and include the permission in the Appendix. If the instrument or tool is in the public domain, provide this information.

Explain the statistical analysis of the data collected.

Summarize how the analysis of the outcome determines the practice change project outcome and answers the practice question.

Required Resources and Budget

Describe the resources needed to implement your project. Include these resources in your final budget for the project. The final budget should be balanced.

Results

Describe the data analysis plan in detail, congruent with the main outcome of the project.

Describe the specific statistical tests utilized to analyze data.

Cite literature to support the statistical tests identified for analysis.

Provide a detailed summary of the project results and include charts and graphs to illustrate.

Conclusions

Provide a clear and logical summary of the project.

Provide two or three conclusion statements highlighting the main points for the practice change project.

Brings the manuscript to a reasonable and scholarly conclusion.

Clinical Relevance

Provide a clear and comprehensive discussion of the results.

Examine implications for all that apply to your project: nursing practice, individual nurse outcomes, patients, and the facility or healthcare system(s).

Provide recommendations for nurse leaders, future research, health policy, and education.

If plans for sustainability are not discussed earlier in this section, provide a clear and comprehensive discussion of sustainability plans.

References

Information in this manuscript must be substantiated by citations.

Reference publication dates must be within the last 5 years.

References must be from peer-reviewed journals, government websites, and credible national and global organizations.

In-text citations should align with the reference page.

In-text citations and references must be in the current APA format.

Appendices

Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool with a minimum of 10 research studies leveled and graded.

Compliance Checklist (formative evaluation document)

Data Collection Tool (if applicable)

Permission to use letter for the data collection tool (if applicable)

Educational Offering Table (outline)

Informed Consent (if applicable)

Asset (if applicable)

Other appendices as required

Scholarly Writing Criteria

Submit the paper on the DNP Project Manuscript Template.

Use the headers in the template.

Use the current APA style and format throughout the manuscript.

Use the Chamberlain Guideline for Writing Professional Papers (located in the Student Resource Center) to complete this assignment.

Turn on Grammarly to check the grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation as you write. (Note: If you have not already done so, please download the free version at Grammarly.com before construction of the assignment.)

Use third person in this DNP Project Manuscript. However, per APA section 4.16, you can use first person in specific sections of the DNP Project Manuscript when you are talking about what you did during implementation.

Note: Change the verbiage from future tense (what you planned to do) in the DNP Project proposal from NR702 to the past tense (what you did) in the NR709 Final DNP Project Manuscript.

Writing Requirements (APA format)
Length: varies

1-inch margins

Double-spaced pages

12-point Times New Roman or 11-point Arial font

Headings & subheadings

In-text citations

Title page

References page

Standard English usage and mechanics

Organized presentation of ideas

Program Competencies

This assignment enables the student to meet the following program competencies:

Integrates scientific underpinnings into everyday clinical practice. (POs 3, 5)

Applies organizational and system leadership skills to affect systemic changes in corporate culture and to promote continuous improvement in clinical outcomes. (PO 6)

Uses analytic methods to translate critically appraised research and other evidence into clinical scholarship for innovative practice improvements. (POs 3, 5)

Appraises current information systems and technologies to improve health care. (POs 6, 7)

Creates a supportive organizational culture for flourishing collaborative teams to facilitate clinical disease prevention and promote population health at all system levels. (PO 8)

Leads others in professional identity, advanced clinical judgment, systems thinking, resilience, and accountability in selecting, implementing, and evaluating clinical care. (POs 1, 4)

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

Evaluate the outcomes of the DNP Project using narrative and statistical methods. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4; POs 3, 5, 6)

Develop a comprehensive plan for communicating the results of the evaluation of DNP project for determination of sustainability and replication. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4; POs 5, 6)
Engage in a process of self-assessment and career planning through the development of an electronic professional portfolio to demonstrate growth and development, achievement of program outcomes, and DNP sub-competencies as designed in the AACN DNP Essentials. (PCs 2, 4; PO 6)

Use project management processes to implement the DNP project. (PCs 6, 8; POs 4, 8)

Due Date

By 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday

Late Assignment Policy applies

Rubric

Week 4 Assignment 1 Grading Rubric
Week 4 Assignment 1 Grading Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRevision Reminder

After submitting your Final DNP Project Manuscript by the due date, and receiving feedback from your course faculty, you will have the opportunity to revise and resubmit your manuscript one time and your manuscript will then be graded. After receiving feedback from your course faculty, the revised manuscript must be returned to your course faculty in seven (7) days.

0 pts

Acceptable or Basic Level of Performance

0 pts

Excellent or Highest Level of Performance

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

0 pts

Good or High Level of Performance
0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAbstract

Requirements:

1. The abstract includes all required content in 150 – 200 words (no more than one page).

2. The abstract is structured by the required subheadings: Background, Problem, Methods, Intervention, Results, Conclusion, and Keywords. The word Keywords is indented and in italics; the actual keywords are in regular font.

3. The Final DNP Project is effectively summarized.

4. No citations are used in the abstract.

5. The abstract is double-spaced.
10 pts

Excellent or Highest Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and creates an excellent abstract.

9 pts

Good or High Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and creates a sufficient abstract.

8 pts

Acceptable or Basic Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or creates a basic abstract.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides an underdeveloped abstract.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTitle and Introduction and Background

Requirements:

1. Bold the title.

2. The title should inform and engage the reader.

3. The title should include your population, intervention, and/or outcome.

4. The title should be concise (nore more than 12 words) and contain fully spelled-out words with no abbreviations.

5. Place the title of your project as the level 1 heading for this section (bold and centered).

6. Start the introduction with a powerful statement or two to stimulate the interest.

7. Explicitly state that the DNP Project Manuscript concerns an evidence-based intervention to improve healthcare outcomes.

8. Explicitly state the practice problem and the purpose of the project.

9. Identify the main sections of the paper to preview what the paper will include.
10 pts

Includes all requirements and creates an excellent title and introduction and background.

9 pts

Includes all requirements and creates a sufficient title and introduction and background.

8 pts

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or creates a basic title and introduction and background.

0 pts

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides an undeveloped title and introduction and background.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProblem

Requirements:

1. Articulate the issue clearly and succinctly and its significance (incidence, prevalence, and/or mortality data) from a global, national, and local perspective. Then, conclude by discussing the problem within the practicum site. (3 paragraphs)

2. Examine the global or worldwide prevalence, healthcare costs, and impact (mortality and/or other data) of the problem.

3. Examine the global impact on nurses, quality of care, healthcare organizations, safety, and society/social justice considerations as relevant to the project problem.

4. Describe the national prevalence, healthcare costs, and impact (mortality and/or other data) of the problem.

5. Analyze the national impact on nurses, quality of care, healthcare organizations, safety, society and/or social justice consideration as relevant to the project problem.

6. Explain the problem at the practicum site. (If available and applicable, examine the incidence, prevalence, and financial impact.)

7. Examine the practicum site impact on nurses, quality of care, safety, social justice, and the healthcare organization.

8. Describe what the practicum site has done to address the problem, or state that there is no evidence that the problem has been addressed.

10 pts

Includes all requirements and provides an in-depth discussion about the problem.

9 pts

Includes all requirements and provides a sufficient discussion about the problem.

8 pts

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial discussion about the practice problem.

0 pts

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides an undeveloped discussion about the problem.
10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProject Aim and Supporting Objectives and Practice Question

Requirements:

1. Explain the specific overall aim of the project.

2. Identify 3-4 measurable objectives of the project that supported the aim.

3. Place the objectives in a sequenced format (a)…, (b)…., (c)…., etc.

4. Include a one-sentence practice question.

5. Begin this section with a lead-in sentence such as, “The following practice question will serve as the basis for the DNP project:”
10 pts

Includes all requirements and provides an excellent discussion of the aim, supporting objectives, and practice question.

9 pts

Includes all requirements and provides a very good discussion of the aim, supporting objectives, and practice question.

8 pts

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a basic discussion of the aim, supporting objectives, and practice question.

0 pts

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a poor discussion of the aim, supporting objectives, and practice question.
10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch Synthesis and Evidence-Based Intervention Part 1 – Johns Hopkins Individual Summary Tool

Requirements:

1. Complete the Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool.

2. Enter 10 or more research articles supporting the evidence-based intervention.

3. Enter the correct information in each column.

4. The Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool is included as Appendix A in the DNP Project Manuscript Template.

10 pts

Includes all requirements and provides an in-depth Johns Hopkins Individual Summary table in Appendix A.

9 pts

Includes all requirements and provides a sufficient Johns Hopkins Individual Summary table in Appendix A.

8 pts

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial Johns Hopkins Individual Summary table.

0 pts

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides an undeveloped Johns Hopkins Individual Summary table.
10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch Synthesis and Evidence-Based Intervention Part 2 – and Part 3 Themes of Research Evidence

Requirements:

1. Begin this section with the name and brief description of the evidence-based intervention.

2. Identify the national organization or government agency that endorses the intervention, if applicable.

3. Start the synthesis section with a statement of the exact number of articles in the synthesis that support the intervention.

4. The synthesis section must include at least 10 articles supporting the intervention.

5. The articles must be 5 years old or less or seminal research.

6. The sources should be evidence-based, peer-reviewed research articles.

7. In a brief summary statement, provide the numbers of research articles that are level I, II, and III and give a summary of the quality of the research articles.

8. Identify the main themes that emerge from the sources and describe how the intervention has been utilized to solve a similar problem.

9. Explain the differences (contrast the main points) in the research articles.

10. Present an objective summary statement supporting the evidence-based intervention.

20 pts

Includes all requirements and provides an in-depth description of the intervention and themes discussion.

18 pts

Includes all requirements and provides a sufficient description of the intervention and themes discussion.

16 pts

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial description of the intervention and themes discussion.

0 pts

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides an undeveloped description of the intervention and themes discussion.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch Synthesis and Evidence-Based Intervention Part 4 – Detailed Sequence of Intervention

Requirements:

1. Provide an in-depth and exact explanation of the evidence-based intervention you implemented.

2. Use the research articles to create a detailed discussion describing each of the steps in the intervention implementation.

3. Describe in detail how each participant engaged with the intervention from beginning to end of the intervention.
10 pts

Includes all requirements and provides an in-depth and detailed sequence of the intervention.

9 pts

Includes all requirements and provides a sufficient detailed sequence of the intervention.

8 pts

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial discussion of the intervention.

0 pts

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides an undeveloped discussion of the intervention.

10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganizational Setting

Requirements: Provide a detailed description of the setting for the project, including the following:

1. State the type of healthcare setting or community setting.

2. Describe the location.

3. Explain the typical patient and typical diagnoses.

4. Identify how many patients or participants are seen monthly and, if applicable, state the average length of stay.

5. Describe the interdisciplinary care team that contributes to the patients’ health management and outcomes.
10 pts

Includes all requirements and provides an in-depth organizational setting description.

9 pts

Includes all requirements and provides a sufficient organizational setting description.

8 pts

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial organizational setting description.

0 pts

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides an undeveloped organizational setting description.
10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePopulation

Requirements:

1. Describe the details of your specific project population.

2. Provide the final total number of participants.

3. Explain inclusion and exclusion criteria for the project.

4. Describe how the participants were enrolled and if informed consent was needed.
5 pts

Includes all requirements and provides an in-depth description of the population.

4 pts

Includes all requirements and provides a sufficient description of the population.

3 pts

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial description of the population.

0 pts

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides an undeveloped description of the population.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTranslational Science Model and Project Management Plan

Requirements:

1. Identify the theory or model that served as the framework for the project; translational science models are recommended.

2. Identify the primary concepts or steps of the model.

3. Create the steps in your DNP practice change project that coincide with the theoretical concepts.

4. Include the timeframe for each step in your project plan (e.g. “in week 1 the data before intervention implementation was collected”). Describe the project management plan by starting with the timeline of weeks for the project (usual projects are 8-12 weeks, keeping in mind the requirement to implement the intervention for at least eight weeks).

5. The implementation plan must include a full eight weeks of intervention implementation.

6. Include the plan for the pre- and post-summative data collection.

7. Include the weekly plan for the formative evaluation to ensure high intervention fidelity.

8. For each step or activity in the intervention plan, identify the intervention week in which that activity occurred.

10 pts

Includes all requirements and provides an in-depth description of the translational science model and project management plan.

9 pts

Includes all requirements and provides a sufficient description of the translational science model and project management plan.

8 pts

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial description of the translational science model and project management plan.

0 pts

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides an undeveloped description of the translational science model and project management plan.
10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePlans for Sustainability

Requirements:

1. Create your detailed plan to sustain the project over time.

2. Identify the specific strategies used to ensure the project has ongoing evaluation and modification as needed to ensure its success after your implementation phase is complete.

5 pts

Includes all requirements and provides an in-depth plan for sustainability.

4 pts

Includes all requirements and provides a sufficient plan for sustainability.

3 pts

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial plan for sustainability.

0 pts

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides an undeveloped plan for sustainability.
5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBarriers, Facilitators and Ethical Considerations

Requirements:

1. Assess barriers and state how you overcame e these obstacles.

2. Assess the facilitators and ways support was leveraged.

3. Evaluate changes with leadership that impacted the project.

4. Analyze ethical considerations and how private health information and/or data collected was protected.

5. State the IRB requirements from the university and practicum site.

6. Explain if there was a need for informed consent or assent.

10 pts

Includes all requirements and provides an in-depth discussion about the barriers, facilitators, and ethical considerations.

9 pts

Includes all requirements and provides a sufficient discussion about the barriers, facilitators, and ethical considerations.

8 pts

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial discussion about the barriers, facilitators, and ethical considerations.

0 pts

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides an undeveloped discussion about the barriers, facilitators, and ethical considerations.
10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeData Collection and Analysis Plan

Requirements:

1. Create your detailed data collection plan with a description of how you collected data and when.

2. If a retrospective chart audit was used, explain how you collected pre- and post-intervention data?

3. If a data collection instrument or tool was used, describe the instrument or tool and provide a citation and matching reference.

4. Was permission to use the instrument or tool required? If so, state that you have permission and include the permission in the Appendix. If the instrument or tool is in the public domain, provide this information.

5. Explain the statistical analysis of the data collected.

6. Summarize how the analysis of the outcome determines the practice change project outcome and answers the practice question.

10 pts

Includes all requirements and provides an in-depth discussion about the data collection and analysis plan.

9 pts

Includes all requirements and provides a sufficient discussion about the data collection and analysis plan.

8 pts

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial discussion about the data collection and analysis plan.

0 pts

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides an undeveloped discussion about the data collection and analysis plan.
10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequired Resources and Budget

Requirements:

1. Describe the resources needed to implement your project. Include these resources in your budget for the project. The budget should be balanced.
5 pts

Includes all requirements and provides an in-depth discussion about the required resources and budget.

4 pts

Includes all requirements and provides a sufficient discussion about the required resources and budget.

3 pts

Includes all requirements and/or provides a partial discussion about the required resources and budget.

0 pts

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides an undeveloped discussion about the required resources and budget.

5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResults

Requirements:

1. Describe the data analysis plan in detail, congruent with the main outcome of the project.

2. Describe the specific statistical tests utilized to analyze data.

3. Cite literature to support the statistical tests identified for analysis.

4. Provide a detailed summary of the project results and include charts and graphs to illustrate.
20 pts

Includes all requirements and provides an in-depth discussion about the results.

18 pts

Includes all requirements and provides a sufficient discussion about the results.

16 pts

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial discussion about the results.

0 pts

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides an undeveloped discussion about the results

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion

Requirements:

1. Provide a clear and logical summary of the project.

2. Provide two or three conclusion statements highlighting the main points for the practice change project.

3. Brings the manuscript to a reasonable and scholarly conclusion.

10 pts

Includes all requirements and provides an in-depth discussion about the conclusion.

9 pts

Includes all requirements and provides a sufficient discussion about the conclusion.

8 pts

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial discussion about the conclusion.

0 pts

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides an undeveloped discussion about the conclusion.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClinical Relevance

Requirements:

1. Provide a clear and comprehensive discussion of the results.

2. Examine implications for all that apply to your project: nursing practice, individual nurse outcomes, patients, and the facility or healthcare system(s).

3. Provide recommendations for nurse leaders, future research, health policy, and education in the nursing field.

4. If plans for sustainability are not discussed earlier in this section, provide a clear and comprehensive discussion of sustainability plans.
10 pts

Includes all requirements and provides an in-depth discussion about the clinical relevance.

9 pts

Includes all requirements and provides a sufficient discussion about the clinical relevance.

8 pts

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial discussion about the clinical relevance.

0 pts

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides an undeveloped discussion about the clinical relevance.
10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferences

Requirements:

1. Reference publication dates must be within the last 5 years.

2. References must be from peer-reviewed journals, government websites, and/or credible national and global organizations.

3. In-text citations should align with the reference page.

4. In-text citations and references must be in the current APA format.

10 pts

Includes all requirements and provides an excellent reference section.

9 pts

Includes all requirements and provides a sufficient reference section.

8 pts

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial reference section.

0 pts

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides an undeveloped reference section.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAppendices

Requirements:

1. Appendix A Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool with a minimum of 10 research studies leveled and graded

2. Compliance Checklist (formative evaluation document)

3. Data collection tool (if applicable)

4. Permission to use letter for the data collection tool (if applicable)

5. Educational Offering Table (outline)

6. Informed Consent (if applicable)

7. Assent (if applicable)

8. Other appendices as required

5 pts

Includes all requirements and provides excellent appendices.

4 pts

Includes all requirements and provides a sufficient appendices.

3 pts

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides basic appendices.

0 pts

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides undeveloped appendices.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly Writing and Clarity of Writing  Criteria

Requirements:

1. Submit the paper on the DNP Project Manuscript Template

2. Use the headers in the template.

3. Use the current APA style and format throughout the manuscript.

4. Standard English usage and mechanics 

5. No spelling or typographical errors

6. Organized presentation of ideas
10 pts

Includes all requirements and is excellent scholarly writing and clarity.

9 pts

Includes all requirements and provides a sufficient scholarly writing and clarity.

8 pts

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides basic sufficient scholarly writing and clarity.

0 pts

Includes fewer than all requirements of APA style and standards and/or provides undeveloped sufficient scholarly writing and clarity.
10 pts

Total Points: 200

PreviousNext

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NR 709 Full Course Discussions & Assignments (Week 1-7) HERE

NR 709A Weeks 5 &Â 6 Assignment: Final Professional Poster

Weeks 5 & 6Final Professional Poster

Assignment

Purpose

The purpose of this activity is for students to create a professional poster to disseminate their DNP evidence-based practice change project through a poster presentation at a national conference. This progressive poster assignment began in NR707 and is completed in NR709.

Instructions

Use the poster you started in NR707 for this assignment.

Submit a completed poster by Sunday of Week 5 by 11:59 p.m. MT.

Once feedback is received from your course faculty, revise the poster to include all of your faculty recommendations.

Return the revised poster to the Week 5 Dropbox per your course faculty’s instructions. The poster must be finalized and approved by your course faculty by Sunday of Week 6 by 11:59 p.m. MT. This deadline is firm as the poster must meet all requirements and be approved by your course faculty in order for you to present during the DNP Project Presentations on Thursday of Week 7.

The content should be well-developed, concisely conveyed, and supported by evidence. Leave space between each section without words so that there is a space break between sections.

Format your poster using the following format and guidelines:
Layout & Organization

Visual Presentation

Your poster sections are required to have the exact sections and headers as the NR707 Poster template and in the same order. Use the following template headings

Practice Problem

Practice Question

Methodology

Implications

Results

Conclusions

References

The poster conveys the practice change project concisely and accurately to enhance reader comprehension.

Read the poster from another person’s point of view to ensure that the information you entered describes your practice change project concisely and flows logically.

Include the following in your poster:

Practice Problem

Offer strong evidence-based statements for the significance data, including prevalence, and/or incidence, and/or mortality data at the national and state (or county or city) levels. If available, include data from the practicum site to support this is a priority problem for the organization.

Include the project aim (main purpose or objective) at the end of this section.

Include in-text citations.

Use bullet points for the practice problem data points. Bullet points are not required for the project aim.

Use concise and accurate statements.

Practice Question

The practice question must be the exact approved PICOT practice question as identified in the Chamberlain University IRB approval letter.

Remove the name or identifiers of the practicum site from the practice question and other sections of the poster.

Methodology (Part 1 and Part 2 in the Rubric)

In this section, students who are implementing at the practicum site are required to state the information in short concise phrases with bullet points. Use the exact sub headers listed on the poster template

State the translational science model or theory/change model.

Provide a short description of the setting.

Provide a short description of the population with the final number of participants.

Briefly state the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Briefly describe the intervention (cite primary source).

Briefly describe the formative evaluation plan.

Briefly describe the summative evaluation plan.

State the main outcome in the PICOT practice question.

Briefly describe the data collection (e.g., pre-intervention and post-intervention data collection).

State the name of the data collection instrument (cite source) OR data source (e.g., data extraction from chart or EHR, or data from the quality department, etc.).

State the data analysis plan (descriptive statistics or statistical test).

State the exact timeframe for the total implementation and the intervention implementation (e.g., Total implementation: 10 weeks; Intervention implementation: 8 weeks).

Results

Describe the major findings in the context of the overall purpose of the project.

Present the statistical analyses of your primary outcome and process measures.

There should be a clear relationship between the problems that drove the project and the findings presented. Inclusion of a graph or chart is recommended; there should be written text to explain the content of the graph/chart.

Implications for Nursing and Healthcare

Briefly state your implications for changing patient, nursing practice, and organizational outcomes. The outcomes should be based on the research supporting your intervention. Implications should be developed for each system level below:

Micro (patient or individual nurse outcomes)

Meso (unit or department collective nursing practice)

Macro (facility or healthcare system[s])

Use a bullet point for each implication (one for each system level)

Do not include the terms Micro, Meso, Macro in the bullet points (cover the concepts)

Conclusion

Briefly describe the contribution your practice project has made to the body of scientific knowledge on your topic and how this improves nursing practice.

References: Use of Scientific Evidence

Every reference is required to be associated with an in-text citation.

The poster includes at least three (3) references; research articles (primary research or systematic reviews) or data from a government or nationally-recognized healthcare organization related to the DNP project in citations and references. Avoid secondary or summary sources.

References must be published in the past 5 years.

References and in-text citations are required to be in correct APA format, excluding the hanging indent (which PowerPoint may not enable).

Program Competencies

This assignment enables the student to meet the following program competencies:

Integrates scientific underpinnings into everyday clinical practice. (POs 3, 5)

Applies organizational and system leadership skills to affect systemic changes in corporate culture and to promote continuous improvement in clinical outcomes. (PO 6)
Uses analytic methods to translate critically appraised research and other evidence into clinical scholarship for innovative practice improvements. (POs 3, 5)
Appraises current information systems and technologies to improve health care. (POs 6, 7)

Creates a supportive organizational culture for flourishing collaborative teams to facilitate clinical disease prevention and promote population health at all system levels. (PO 8)

Leads others in professional identity, advanced clinical judgment, systems thinking, resilience, and accountability in selecting, implementing, and evaluating clinical care. (POs 1, 4)

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

Evaluate the outcomes of the DNP Project using narrative and statistical methods. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4; POs 3, 5, 6)

Develop a comprehensive plan for communicating the results of the evaluation of DNP project for determination of sustainability and replication. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4; POs 5, 6)

Engage in a process of self-assessment and career planning through the development of an electronic professional portfolio to demonstrate growth and development, achievement of program outcomes, and DNP sub-competencies as designed in the AACN DNP Essentials. (PCs 2, 4; PO 6)
Use project management processes to implement the DNP project. (PCs 6, 8; POs 4, 8)

Due Date
By 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday

Late Assignment Policy applies

Rubric

Weeks 5&6_Professional Poster Rubric
Weeks 5&6_Professional Poster Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLayout and Organization

Requirements:

1. Your poster sections are required to have the exact sections and headers as the template:

– Practice Problem

– Practice Question

– Methodology

– Implications

– Results

– Conclusions

– References

2. The location of the headings are in the exact columns of the template provided.

3. The poster conveys the project concisely and accurately.

10 pts

Excellent or Highest Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and provides excellent layout and organization.

9 pts

Good or High Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a sufficient layout and organization.

8 pts

Acceptable or Basic Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial or basic layout and organization.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Provides an undeveloped or poor layout and organization.

10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVisual Presentation

Requirements: 

1. The poster is free of spelling, punctuation, and or grammatical errors.

2. The poster title is 60-72 font size; title is centered, 12 words or less, and all words are fully spelled out (no abbreviations or acronyms)

3. Name and credentials are 32-36 font size; name/credentials are centered.

4. The headings are 32-40 font size.

5. The text in each section is 24-32; the text size in each section is consistent across the entire poster (except Reference section, this can be smaller).

6. Font type should be Arial, Calibri, or Times New Roman and needs to be consistent across the entire poster.

7. Font size in Reference section is legible.

8. There is an empty space between each section.

9. Colors adhere to the template provided.

10. No clip art or pictures are in the poster. (A graph or table in the Results section is okay.) Graphs and tables are ok.)

11. Text is not hanging off the poster template.

12. All revisions requested by faculty are completed
10 pts

Excellent or Highest Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and provides an excellent visual poster presentation.

9 pts

Good or High Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a sufficient visual poster presentation.

8 pts

Acceptable or Basic Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial or basic visual poster presentation.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a sufficient visual poster presentation.

10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePractice Problem and Project Aim (Purpose)

Requirements:

1. Provide the significant data, including prevalence, and/or incidence, and/or mortality data at the national and state (or county or city) levels.

2. Include in-text citation(s).

3. Use bullet points for each entry (Except the Project Aim)

4. Use concise and accurate statements.

5. The project aim is a succinct and complete statement of what the intervention will change- your desired outcome.

10 pts

Excellent or Highest Level of Performance

Includes all data requirements and provides an in-depth and also concise practice problem section. The project aim statement is concise and robust.

9 pts

Good or High Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a sufficient discussion of the practice problem and the project aim.

8 pts

Acceptable or Basic Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial or basic discussion of the practice problem and/or the project aim.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a sufficient discussion of the practice problem and the project aim.
10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePractice Question

Requirements:

1. The practice question must be the exact approved PICOT practice question as identified in the Chamberlain University IRB approval letter.

2. The name or identifiers of the practicum site are removed from the practice question and other sections of the poster.

10 pts

Excellent or Highest Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and includes the practice question from the IRB approval letter.

9 pts

Good or High Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a sufficient practice question from the IRB approval letter.

8 pts

Acceptable or Basic Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial practice question.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or an undeveloped practice question.
10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMethodology Part 1 (Implementation students only)

Requirements:

1. Use short- concise phrases with bullet points.

2. Use the exact subheaders listed on the poster template.

3. State the translational science model or theory/change model.

4. Provide a short description of the setting.

5. Provide a short description of the population with the final number of participants.

6. Briefly state the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

7. Briefly describe the intervention (cite primary source).

10 pts

Excellent or Highest Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and provides an accurate and concise methodology section.

9 pts

Good or High Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a sufficient methodology section.

8 pts

Acceptable or Basic Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial or basic methodology section.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Provides an undeveloped methodology section.

10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMethodology Part 2 (Implementation students only)

Requirements:

1. Briefly state the formative evaluation plan.

2. Briefly state the summative evaluation plan.

3. Briefly state the main outcome from the PICOT practice question.

4. Briefly describe the data collection (e.g., pre-intervention and post-intervention data collection).

5. State the name of the data collection instrument (with primary citation) OR data source.

6. Briefly describe the data analysis plan.

7. State the exact timeframe for the total implementation and the intervention implementation.

10 pts

Excellent or Highest Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and provides an accurate and concise methodology section.

9 pts

Good or High Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a sufficient methodology section.

8 pts

Acceptable or Basic Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial or basic methodology section.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Provides an undeveloped methodology section.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResults

Requirements:

1. Describe the major findings in the context of the overall purpose of the project.

2. Present the statistical analyses of your primary outcome and process measures.

3. There should be a clear relationship between the problems that drove the project and the findings presented.

4. Inclusion of a graph or chart is recommended; written text to explain the content of the graph/chart is present.
10 pts

Excellent or Highest Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and provides an accurate and in-depth results discussion.

9 pts

Good or High Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a sufficient results discussion.

8 pts

Acceptable or Basic Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial or basic results discussion.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Provides an undeveloped results discussion.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeImplications

Requirements:

1. Implications should be developed in a brief statement for each level below.

2. Micro (patient or individual nurse outcomes)

3. Meso (Unit or department collective nursing practice)

4. Macro (facility or healthcare system[s])

5. Use a bullet point for each system level.

6. Do not include the terms Micro, Meso, Macro in the bullet points (cover the concepts).
10 pts

Excellent or Highest Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and provides an accurate and concise implications discussion.

9 pts

Good or High Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a sufficient implications discussion.

8 pts

Acceptable or Basic Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial implications discussion.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Provides an undeveloped implications discussion.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion

Requirements:

1. Briefly describe the contribution your practice project has made to the body of scientific knowledge on your topic and how this improves nursing practice.
10 pts

Excellent or Highest Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and provides an accurate and concise conclusion discussion.

9 pts
Good or High Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a sufficient results discussion.

8 pts

Acceptable or Basic Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial results discussion.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Provides an undeveloped results discussion.

10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferences

Requirements:

1. Every reference has an in-text citation.

2. At least three (3) sources of evidence are included in the references; research articles (primary research or systematic reviews) or data from a government or nationally recognized healthcare organization.

3. No secondary or summary sources are included.

4. References must be published within the past 5 years.

5. References and in-text citations are required to be in correct APA format, excluding the hanging indent (which PowerPoint may not enable).

10 pts

Excellent or Highest Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and provides excellent use of scientific evidence and reference section.

9 pts

Good or High Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides sufficient use of scientific evidence and reference section.

8 pts

Acceptable or Basic Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides partial or basic use of scientific evidence and reference section.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Provides undeveloped use of scientific evidence and reference section.

10 pts

Total Points: 100

PreviousNext

NR 709 Week 6 Discussion: Disseminating Scholarly Work

Purpose

The purpose of this discussion is to examine dissemination opportunities for your DNP practice change project.

Instructions

Reflect on your readings this week and respond to the following in 150 words or less: 

Analyze and appraise nursing journals most appropriate for publishing your DNP practice change project outcomes.

Investigate professional nursing conferences that align with the primary focus of your DNP practice change project and list the abstract requirements and provide a timeline for submission of an abstract.

Please click on the following link to review the DNP Discussion Guidelines on the Student Resource Center program page:

Link (webpage): DNP Discussion GuidelinesLinks to an external site.

Program Competencies

This discussion enables the student to meet the following program competencies:

Integrates scientific underpinnings into everyday clinical practice. (POs 3, 5)

Applies organizational and system leadership skills to affect systemic changes in corporate culture and to promote continuous improvement in clinical outcomes. (PO 6)

Uses analytic methods to translate critically appraised research and other evidence into clinical scholarship for innovative practice improvements. (POs 3, 5)

Appraises current information systems and technologies to improve health care. (POs 6, 7)

Course Outcomes

This discussion enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

Develop a comprehensive plan for communicating the results of the evaluation of the DNP Project for determination of sustainability and replication. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4; POs 5, 6)

NR 709 Week 7 Discussion: Sustainability of the DNP Project

Purpose

The purpose of this discussion is to examine barriers to the sustainability of your DNP practice change project.

Instructions

Reflect on your readings this week and respond to the following in 150 words or less:

Examine barriers to the sustainability of your DNP practice change project within your practicum site.

Appraise how the barriers may be overcome to ensure the continuality of your DNP practice change project.

Please click on the following link to review the DNP Discussion Guidelines on the Student Resource Center program page:
Link (webpage): DNP Discussion GuidelinesLinks to an external site.

Program Competencies

This discussion enables the student to meet the following program competencies:

Integrates scientific underpinnings into everyday clinical practice. (POs 3, 5)

Applies organizational and system leadership skills to affect systemic changes in corporate culture and to promote continuous improvement in clinical outcomes. (PO 6)

Uses analytic methods to translate critically appraised research and other evidence into clinical scholarship for innovative practice improvements. (POs 3, 5)

Appraises current information systems and technologies to improve health care. (POs 6, 7)

Creates a supportive organizational culture for flourishing collaborative teams to facilitate clinical disease prevention and promote population health at all system levels. (PO 8)

Leads others in professional identity, advanced clinical judgment, systems thinking, resilience, and accountability in selecting, implementing, and evaluating clinical care. (POs 1, 4)

Course Outcomes

This discussion enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
Evaluate the outcomes of the DNP Project using narrative and statistical methods. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4; POs 3, 5, 6)
Develop a comprehensive plan for communicating the results of the evaluation of the DNP Project for determination of sustainability and replication. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4; POs 5, 6)

Use of project management process to implement the DNP project. (PCs 6, 8; POs 4, 8)

NR 709 Week 7 Assignment 1: Project Presentation

Assignment 1

Purpose

This presentation is an opportunity for the DNP student to share the results of the DNP project with the student’s DNP Committee, DNP faculty, and other DNP students. This presentation may not be scheduled until the student has completed project implementation, data analysis, and evaluation and received a “meets all requirements” on the DNP Professional Poster assignment in Week 5.

Instructions

This assignment consists of both a single-slide PowerPoint file and an online oral presentation.

After receiving Course Faculty Approval, you should have submitted your Final Professional Poster to the assignment by the end of Week 6, Sunday, at 11:59 p.m. MT.

Name your file as last namepresentation.pptx.

Present the poster during the scheduled time on Thursday of Week 7. Your presentation should be 10 minutes, with an additional 5 minutes for Q & A.

The presentation should include the following:

Introduction

Greet the audience.

Introduce self and qualifications to speak on the topic.

Explain the reason for interest in the topic.

Review the objectives of the presentation

Discussion of DNP Project with Required Content

Provide an exemplary discussion of the assigned topic with required content at the appropriate depth, detail, and accuracy.

Extensive knowledge of the topic should be evident through presentation and responses to questions.

Presentation must be organized in an interesting and logical sequence.

Conclusion/Summary

Provide an exemplary summary of what was discussed and a conclusion with recommendations.

Invite questions.

Verbal Presentation Requirements/Speech Presentation Quality
Time limit: up to 10 minutes and 5 minutes for questions/comments

Enthusiastic and engaging

Fluid with clear pronunciation

Varying intonation and appropriate loudness and speed to communicate interest

Excellent vocabulary with no mispronunciations

No use of slang or profanity

No reading from slides

Visual Presentation Requirements

No errors in spelling, grammar, or punctuation

Font size and style are appropriate

The required poster template is used

Appropriate use of visuals (no clip art or pictures)

Professional attire and background

All revisions requested by faculty are completed

Program Competencies

This assignment enables the student to meet the following program competencies:

Integrates scientific underpinnings into everyday clinical practice. (POs 3, 5)

Applies organizational and system leadership skills to affect systemic changes in corporate culture and to promote continuous improvement in clinical outcomes. (PO 6)

Uses analytic methods to translate critically appraised research and other evidence into clinical scholarship for innovative practice improvements. (POs 3, 5)

Appraises current information systems and technologies to improve health care. (POs 6, 7)

Creates a supportive organizational culture for flourishing collaborative teams to facilitate clinical disease prevention and promote population health at all system levels. (PO 8)

Leads others in professional identity, advanced clinical judgment, systems thinking, resilience, and accountability in selecting, implementing, and evaluating clinical care. (POs 1, 4)

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

Evaluate the outcomes of the DNP Project using narrative and statistical methods. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4; POs 3, 5, 6)

Develop a comprehensive plan for communicating the results of the evaluation of DNP project for determination of sustainability and replication. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4; POs 5, 6)

Engage in a process of self-assessment and career planning through the development of an electronic professional portfolio to demonstrate growth and development, achievement of program outcomes, and DNP sub-competencies as designed in the AACN DNP Essentials. (PCs 2, 4; PO 6)

Use project management processes to implement the DNP project. (PCs 6, 8; POs 4, 8)

Due Date

By 11:59 p.m. MT on Thursday

Late Assignment Policy applies

Rubric

Week 7 Assignment 1 Grading Rubric

Week 7 Assignment 1 Grading Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction

Requirements:

1. Greet the audience.

2. Introduce self and qualifications to speak on topic.

3. Explain reason for interest in topic.

4. Review objectives and areas to be discussed in the presentation.

7 pts

Excellent or Highest Level of Performance

Exceeds expectations Student greeted the audience. Introduced self and qualifications to speak on topic. Explained reason for interest in topic. Reviewed objectives and areas to be discussed in the presentation.

6 pts

Good or High Level of Performance

Meets expectations Student greeted the audience. Introduced self but did not identify qualifications or reason for interest. Reviewed objectives and areas to be discussed in the presentation.

5 pts

Acceptable or Basic Level of Performance

Nearly meets expectations Student failed to greet audience or introduce self, qualifications, or reason for interest in topic. Insufficient introduction of the objectives and areas to be discussed in the presentation.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Does not meet expectation Student failed to greet audient or introduce self, qualifications, or reason for interest in topic. Did not identify objectives or areas to be discussed.
7 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscussion of DNP Project with Required Content

Requirements:

1. Provide exemplary discussion of assigned topic with required content at appropriate depth, detail, and accuracy.

2. Extensive knowledge of topic should be clearly evident through presentation and responses to questions.

3. Presentation must be organized in an interesting and logical sequence.
55 pts

Excellent or Highest Level of Performance

Exceeds expectations Student provided an exemplary summary of what was discussed and conclusion with recommendations. Student invited questions. Exemplary discussion of assigned topic with required content at appropriate depth, detail, and accuracy. Extensive knowledge of topic is clearly evident through presentation and responses to questions. Presentation is organized in an interesting and logical sequence.

50 pts

Good or High Level of Performance

Meets expectations Discussion of assigned topic with almost all required content at appropriate depth and detail. Knowledge of topic is evident through presentation and responses to questions. Presentation is organized.

45 pts

Acceptable or Basic Level of Performance

Meets expectations Discussion of assigned topic with almost all required content at appropriate depth and detail. Knowledge of topic is evident through presentation and responses to questions. Presentation is organized.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Does not meet expectation Discussion omitted more than one area of required content. Presentation jumps from topic to topic and impossible to follow.

55 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion/ Summary

Requirements:

1. Provide an exemplary summary of what was discussed and conclusion with recommendations.

2. Invite questions.

8 pts

Excellent or Highest Level of Performance

Exceeds expectations Student provided an exemplary summary of what was discussed and conclusion with recommendations. Student invited questions.

7 pts

Good or High Level of Performance

Meets expectations Student provided a summary of what was discussed but no recommendations given. Student invited questions.

6 pts

Acceptable or Basic Level of Performance

Nearly meets expectations Student provided a brief summary with no conclusion or recommendations OR student did not invite questions.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Does not meet expectation Student provided no conclusion or summary AND student did not invite questions.

8 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVerbal Presentation Requirements/Speech Presentation Quality

Requirements:

1. Time limit: up to 10 minutes for presentation and 5 minutes for questions/comments

2. Enthusiastic and engaging

3. Fluid with clear enunciation

4. Varying intonation and appropriate loudness and speed to communicate interest

5. Excellent vocabulary with no mispronunciations

6. No use of slang or profanity

7. No reading from slides

20 pts

Excellent or Highest Level of Performance

Exceeds expectations Adheres to time limit. Enthusiastic and engaging. Speech is fluid with clear enunciation. Uses voice to communicate interest by varying intonation and appropriate loudness and speed. Excellent vocabulary with no mispronunciations. No use of slang or profanity. No reading from slides.

18 pts

Good or High Level of Performance

Meets expectations No more than 10% over time limit. No hesitancy or “uh,” “hmmm,” or “you know.” Does vary intonation and speech is of appropriate loudness and speed. Good vocabulary and no more than 1-2 mispronunciations. No use of slang or profanity. Uses notes minimally and does not read from slides.

16 pts

Acceptable or Basic Level of Performance

Nearly meets expectations More than 10% over time limit. Hesitancy, some “uh,” “hmmm,” or “you know.” Limited variation in intonation. Speech is too soft, too loud, too fast, or too slow. Limited vocabulary and more than 2 mispronunciations. Use of slang or profanity. Reads from the slides.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Does not meet expectation More than 20% over time limit. Frequent pauses, lots of “uh,” “hmmm,” or “you know,” or monotone. Speech is too soft, too loud, too fast, or too slow. Limited vocabulary and frequent mispronunciations. Use of slang or profanity. Reads from the slides.

20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVisual Presentation

Requirements:

1. No errors in spelling, grammar, or punctuation

2. Font size and style are appropriate

3. The required poster template is used.

4. Appropriate use of visuals (no clip art or pictures)

5. Professional attire and background

6. All revisions requested by faculty are completed
10 pts

Excellent or Highest Level of Performance

Exceeds expectations No errors in spelling, grammar, or punctuation. Font size and style are appropriate. The required poster template is used. Appropriate use of visuals. Attire and background are professional.

9 pts

Good or High Level of Performance

Meets expectations No more than two errors in spelling, grammar, or punctuation. Font size and style are appropriate. The required poster template is used. Appropriate use of visuals. Attire and background are professional.

8 pts

Acceptable or Basic Level of Performance

Nearly meets expectations More than two errors in spelling, grammar, or punctuation. Font size and style are inappropriate. The required poster template is used. Distracting visuals or inadequate visuals.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Does not meet expectation Many errors in spelling, grammar, or punctuation. Font style and/or size are inappropriate. The required poster template is not used. Clip art and pictures are used.
10 pts

Total Points: 100

PreviousNext

NR 709 Week 7 Assignment 2: DNP Portfolio

Purpose

The DNP Portfolio is a collection of scholarly work and writing that depicts the development of your knowledge, competency, and achievement of the AACN DNP Essentials (2006). The DNP Portfolio provides you with an opportunity to highlight the knowledge and competencies learned in the DNP program and the completion of the DNP practice change project for their successful transition to the role of DNP-prepared nurse and healthcare systems leader.

Instructions

For this assignment, you will submit three (3) individual files. You can submit all the files in a single submission; however, you may need to include all files in a single ZIP file. Each individual file should be labeled with your last name and DNP Portfolio (For example: Soprano. DNP Portfolio – Personal Philosophy Paper). The DNP Portfolio should include the following components:

DNP Practice Change Project Abstract

Provide the abstract from your course faculty-approved Final DNP Project Manuscript. The abstract should be a brief (150-250 words) overview of the DNP practice change project to include the following:

Background

Problem

Methods

Intervention

Results

Conclusions

Keywords

Personal Philosophy on the Contribution of DNP-Prepared Nurses to Healthcare Outcomes

Develop and describe your personal philosophy on the contribution of DNP-prepared nurses to healthcare outcomes.

Appraise and elaborate on how you will use your knowledge from your DNP degree program to impact the future of healthcare.

Commitment to Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Healthcare Statement

Develop a statement on your commitment as a DNP-prepared nurse leader to diversity, equity, and inclusion in healthcare. Describe how you will promote and advocate for the following:

Sense of belonging among healthcare team

Dignity for all patient populations

Justice for individuals with limited or no access to healthcare services

Writing Requirements (APA format)

Length: 1-2 pages per statement (not including title page or references page)

1-inch margins

Double-spaced pages

12-point Times New Roman or 11-point Arial font

Headings & subheadings

In-text citations

Title page (for each statement; the abstract does not require a title page)

References page (for each statement, if references are used)

Standard English usage and mechanics

Organized presentation of ideas

Program Competencies

This assignment enables the student to meet the following program competencies:

Integrates scientific underpinnings into everyday clinical practice. (POs 3, 5)

Applies organizational and system leadership skills to affect systemic changes in corporate culture and to promote continuous improvement in clinical outcomes. (PO 6)

Uses analytic methods to translate critically appraised research and other evidence into clinical scholarship for innovative practice improvements. (POs 3, 5)

Appraises current information systems and technologies to improve health care. (POs 6, 7)
Creates a supportive organizational culture for flourishing collaborative teams to facilitate clinical disease prevention and promote population health at all system levels. (PO 8)

Leads others in professional identity, advanced clinical judgment, systems thinking, resilience, and accountability in selecting, implementing, and evaluating clinical care. (POs 1, 4)

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

Evaluate the outcomes of the DNP Project using narrative and statistical methods. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4; POs 3, 5, 6)

Develop a comprehensive plan for communicating the results of the evaluation of DNP project for determination of sustainability and replication. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4; POs 5, 6)
Engage in a process of self-assessment and career planning through the development of an electronic professional portfolio to demonstrate growth and development, achievement of program outcomes, and DNP sub-competencies as designed in the AACN DNP Essentials. (PCs 2, 4; PO 6)

Use project management processes to implement the DNP project. (PCs 6, 8; POs 4, 8)

Due Date

By 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday

Late Assignment Policy applies

Rubric

Week 7 Assignment 2 Grading Rubric
Week 7 Assignment 2 Grading Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDNP Practice Change Project Abstract

Requirements:

1. Provide your project abstract from your course faculty-approved Final DNP Project Manuscript.

2. The Level I sub-headers in the abstract are exactly as listed below:

– Background

– Problem

– Methods

– Intervention

– Results

– Conclusions

– Keywords

2. The Abstract should be between 150 and 250 words.

15 pts

Excellent or Highest Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and provides an excellent abstract.

13 pts

Good or High Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a sufficient abstract.

12 pts

Acceptable or Basic Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial or basic abstract.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Provides an undeveloped or poor abstract.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePersonal Philosophy on the Contribution of DNP-Prepared Nurses to Healthcare Outcomes

Requirements:

1. Develop and describe your personal philosophy on the contribution of DNP-prepared nurses to healthcare outcomes.

2. Appraise and elaborate on how you will use your knowledge from your DNP degree program to impact the future of healthcare.
15 pts

Excellent or Highest Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and provides an excellent personal philosophy.

14 pts

Good or High Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a sufficient personal philosophy.

12 pts

Acceptable or Basic Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial or basic personal philosophy.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and demonstrates a poor personal philosophy.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCommitment to Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Healthcare Statement

Requirements:

Develop a statement on your commitment as a DNP-prepared nurse leader to diversity, equity, and inclusion in healthcare. Describe how you will promote and advocate for the following:

1. Sense of belonging among healthcare team

2. Dignity for all patient populations

3. Justice for individuals with limited or no access to healthcare services

15 pts

Excellent or Highest Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and provides an in-depth statement of commitment

14 pts

Good or High Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a sufficient statement of commitment.

12 pts

Acceptable or Basic Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial or basic statement of commitment.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Provides an undeveloped statement of commitment.
15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Style and Standards and Clarity of writing

Requirements:

1. Paper length: 1-2 pages per statement, excluding title and reference pages

2. Appropriate Level I headers

3. Title page per statement; the abstract does not require a title page

4. Current APA style for references and citations

5. Standard English usage and mechanics

6. No spelling or typographical errors

7. Organized presentation of ideas

5 pts

Excellent or Highest Level of Performance

Includes all requirements of APA style and standards and clarity of writing.

4 pts

Good or High Level of Performance

Includes at least 5 requirements of APA style and standards and clarity of writing.

3 pts

Acceptable or Basic Level of Performance

Includes at least 4 requirements of APA style and standards and clarity of writing.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or demonstrates poor APA style and standards and clarity of writing.

5 pts

Total Points: 50

PreviousNext