NRS 493 Topic 4 Scholarly Activity Summary

NRS 493 Assignment: Scholarly Activity Summary

NRS 493 Scholarly Activity Summary Assessment Description

Throughout the RN-to-BSN program, students are required to participate in scholarly activities outside of clinical practice or professional practice. Examples of scholarly activities include attending conferences, seminars, journal club, grand rounds, morbidity and mortality meetings, interdisciplinary committees, quality improvement committees, and any other opportunities available at your site, within your community, or nationally.

ORDER  A WELL RESEARCHED, AI FREE ASSIGNMENT ON NRS 493 Scholarly Activity Summary HERE

What is special with us? We prioritize customer satisfaction by offering a “pay after delivery” policy, meaning you will pay when you’re fully satisfied with the quality of your work. Our commitment to originality means that every assignment is compiled from scratch, thoroughly checked for plagiarism and AI, and tailored to meet your specific requirements. We guarantee timely delivery, meaning you are assured that your assignments will always be submitted on time.

You are required to post at least one documented scholarly activity by the end of this course. In addition to this submission, you are required to be involved and contribute to interdisciplinary initiatives on a regular basis.

Submit, by way of this assignment, a summary report of the scholarly activity, including who, what, where, when, and any relevant take-home points. Include the appropriate program competencies associated with the scholarly activity as well as future professional goals related to this activity. You may use the “Scholarly Activity Summary” resource to help guide this assignment.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

Attachments

NRS-493-RS-ScholarlyActivities.docx

NRS 493 Scholarly Activity Summary Sample 

Overview

Participation in scholarly activities like team meetings and conferences is essential for advanced practice nurses (Kleinpell, 2021). The scholarly activity that I participated in was a filter meeting in the organization where I had my practicum. Filter meetings involve interdisciplinary teams that meet at regular times based on organizational procedures and processes to discuss selected issues and variances by the quality improvement team because of their adverse effects on the quality of care offered. These events also include “never events” like falls, hospital-acquired infections, and delays in care provision. The interdisciplinary team consisted of 13 standing members with leaders from departments where such events come to offer detailed explanations concerning the issues to be discussed. The purpose of the filter meetings is to analyze an event determine gaps and procedural issues leading to the occurrence and assign a harm score. The meeting targets hospital management and leadership and the interdisciplinary Filter team to review cases for lessons learned to seek corrective measures and prevent future occurrences. The meeting offered benefits to me as a nurse as I increased my understanding of the importance of continuous quality improvement and how facilities determine ratings like SSE (serious safety events based on a scale of 1 to 5. Exposure through this session had significant effects on my evaluation and perspective about any situation that can occur in my practice setting. NRS 493 Scholarly Activity Summary

Problem

The meeting had six cases for evaluation and review to determine the best course of action for nurses and those involved:

1. Patient falls (2)
2. Medication error (1)
3. Hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) (2)
4. Wrong site surgical procedure (1)

The Filter Committee reviewed each case based on facts heard from the leaders of the respective affected areas who were in attendance. The committee used algorithms for each event based on questions to determine its rank or rating based on the SSE (1-5), a Potential Safety Event (1-5), and a Good Catch.

Solution

1. Patient Falls: all the falls had inconsistent scores and the meeting solved that the providers will require a reeducation session to avoid such events.
2. Medication error: scored a Good Catch and the meeting suggested more education on the unit and its staff.
3. Hospital-acquired infections: Both scored an SSE2, with recommendations that the providers review the medication charting system and communication among nurses
4. Wrong site procedure: The score was PSE2 with the team identifying possible disparities and gaps. The nurse manager was tasked to review and update the current policy and educate the nursing staff.

NRS 493 Scholarly Activity Summary Opportunity

The scholarly activity enhanced my understanding of how healthcare teams and facilities use the harm score and develop quality improvement protocols to enhance the overall quality of care while reducing the occurrence of adverse events like falls and HAIs (Lucchini et al., 2020). The meeting also enlightened me on the genesis of hospital policies on a raft of issues and operational activities and the requisite guidelines that organizations offer to their healthcare workers to deal with them (Grace, 2022). The activity also offered me a chance to meet several competencies based on my Individual Success Plan (ISP). I met the competence of the professional role (Domain 1) as experienced how inter-professional collaboration works in real nursing practice situations. The meeting allowed physicians, nurse leaders, and departmental managers from different areas to address the reported issues and offer solutions (Jowsey et al., 2020). The meeting also offered me a chance to meet competence 1.1 on assuming managerial and leadership roles to promote patient safety and quality care as well as 1.3 which entails participation in policy development to positively impact nursing practice and quality care delivery (1.4).

The meeting offered me a chance to understand and experience the theoretical foundations of nursing practice as captured in Domain 2. It advanced my perspective and understanding of valuing processes like critical thinking and problem-solving approaches, use of ethical decisions, and reasoning when handling diverse patients in practice (2.3). The meeting also allowed me to improve my communication competencies as expected in Domain 4; especially 4.3 as I experienced professional collaboration and the requisite communication approaches used by the providers. The interdisciplinary approach to the six cases reviewed during the meeting demonstrated that healthcare professionals can enhance care delivery by working as a team (Grace, 2022). Such teams are also essential in enhancing communication and quality care improvement through policy-based and evidence-backed interventions.

The overall experience of this scholarly activity will allow me to focus on deliberate ways to improve the management of aspects like falls and when they happen in my practice setting (Oktaria et al., 2023). The scholarly activity was essential in building a team-based approach and embracing the interdisciplinary concept for effective quality care delivery (Chinn et al., 2022). The meeting demonstrated that nurses do not work in a vacuum as they require all professionals in healthcare to work with them for quality care delivery.

Program Competencies Addressed

Based on the Individual Success Plan (ISP), the scholarly activity addressed core competencies comprising 1.1, 1.3, 2.3, and 4.3. These competencies are critical for nurses to succeed in their practice and offer expected quality patient care. For instance, working in interdisciplinary teams requires one to hone and use critical thinking attributes and be an effective communicator.

NRS 493 Scholarly Activity Summary References

Chinn, P. L., Kramer, M. K., & Sitzman, K. (2021). Knowledge development in nursing e-book:

            theory and process. Elsevier Health Sciences.

Grace, P. J. (2022). Nursing ethics and professional responsibility in advanced practice. Jones &

            Bartlett Learning.

Jowsey, T., Foster, G., Cooper-Ioelu, P., & Jacobs, S. (2020). Blended learning via distance in

pre-registration nursing education: A scoping review. Nurse education in practice, 44, 102775. DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102775

Kleinpell, R. M. (Ed.). (2021). Outcome assessment in advanced practice nursing. Springer

            Publishing Company.

Lucchini, A., Giani, M., Elli, S., Villa, S., Rona, R., & Foti, G. (2020). Nursing Activities Score

            is increased in COVID-19 patients. Intensive & critical care nursing, 59, 102876.

DOI: 10.1016/j.iccn.2020.102876

Oktaria, S. D., Badeni, B., & Alexon, A. (2023). Blended Learning Is a Great Solution for Future

Learning Model after COVID-19 in Indonesia. International Journal of Multicultural and Multi-Religious Understanding, 10(5), 31-43.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v10i5.4605