NUR 514 Topic 8 Assignment: Benchmark – Electronic Health Record Implementation

NUR 514 Topic 8 Assignment: Benchmark – Electronic Health Record Implementation

NUR 514 Topic 8 Assignment: Benchmark – Electronic Health Record Implementation

Assessment Traits
Benchmark
Requires Lopeswrite
Assessment Description
One way informatics can be especially valuable is in capturing data to inspire improvements and quality change in practice. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) collects data related to adverse events and safety concerns. If you are working within a practice setting to implement a new electronic health record (EHR) system, this is just one of the many considerations your team would need to plan for during the rollout process.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NUR 514 Topic 8 Assignment: Benchmark – Electronic Health Record Implementation HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

In a paper of 1,500-1,750 words, discuss the following:

Consider an opportunity for tracking care improvement. What key information would be needed in the database? Example: Time lapse from medication order documented in the EHR to delivery of medication to the patient for the cardiology service.
Describe the role informatics plays in the ability to capture this data. What type of project management strategies and methodologies can be implemented to support informatics initiatives to help improve quality within the clinical practice?
Discuss which systems and staff members would need to be involved in the design and implementation process. What is the role of the advanced registered nurse in promoting evidence-based practice and leading quality and performance improvement initiatives within this setting?
Outline strategies for implementing the new EHR proposal. Consider communication changes, transitioning to the new EHR, and managing resources (human, fiscal, and health care resources).
Discuss what professional, ethical, and regulatory standards must be incorporated into the design and implementation of the system.
Describe the measures and steps you would take to evaluate the success of the EHR implementation from a staff, setting, and patient perspective to measure effectiveness and ensure continuous quality improvement in practice?
Explain what leadership skills and theories would be needed to facilitate collaboration with the interprofessional team and provide evidence-based, patient-centered care?
You are required to cite five to 10 sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

Complete the “APA Writing Checklist” to ensure that your paper adheres to APA style and formatting criteria and general guidelines for academic writing. Include the completed checklist as an appendix at the end of your paper.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:

MBA-MSN; MSN-Nursing Education; MSN Acute Care Nurse Practitioner-Adult-Gerontology; MSN Family Nurse Practitioner; MSN-Health Informatics; MSN-Health Care Quality and Patient Safety; MSN-Leadership in Health Care Systems; MSN-Public Health Nursing

2.3: Develop leadership skills to collaborate on interprofessional teams in the provision of evidence-based, patient-centered care.

5.2: Apply professional, ethical, and regulatory standards of practice in the provision of safe, effective health care.

Rubric Criteria

Opportunity for Tracking Care Improvement
21 points
Criteria Description
Opportunity for Tracking Care Improvement

5. 5: Excellent
21 points
Opportunity for tracking care improvement is thoroughly discussed. Key information needed for the database is accurate and clearly presented. The narrative provides insight and is well supported.

4. 4: Good
19.32 points
Opportunity for tracking care improvement is discussed. Key information needed for the database is presented.

3. 3: Satisfactory
18.48 points
Opportunity for tracking care improvement is generally discussed. Some key information needed for the database is summarized.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
16.8 points
Opportunity for tracking care improvement is only partially discussed.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Opportunity for tracking care improvement is not discussed.

Role Informatics Plays in Ability to Capture Data
14.7 points
Criteria Description
Role Informatics Plays in Ability to Capture Data

5. 5: Excellent
14.7 points
The role informatics plays in the ability to capture specified data is clearly described. Project management strategies and methodologies to implement and support informatics initiatives and help improve quality within the clinical practice are discussed. The narrative is insightful and well supported.

4. 4: Good
13.52 points
The role informatics plays in the ability to capture specified data is described. Project management strategies and methodologies to implement and support informatics initiatives and help improve quality within the clinical practice are presented.

3. 3: Satisfactory
12.94 points
The role informatics plays in the ability to capture specified data is summarized. Some general project management strategies and methodologies to implement and support informatics initiatives and help improve quality within the clinical practice are presented.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
11.76 points
The role informatics plays in the ability to capture specified data is only partially discussed.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The role informatics plays in the ability to capture specified data is omitted.

Systems and Staff Members Needed in Design and Implementation Process
16.8 points
Criteria Description
Systems and Staff Members Needed in Design and Implementation Process

5. 5: Excellent
16.8 points
Systems and staff members needed in the design and implementation process are detailed. The role of the advanced registered nurse in promoting evidence-based practice and leading quality and performance improvement initiatives within this setting is thoroughly discussed. The narrative is well developed and demonstrates a clear understanding of the design and implementation process.

4. 4: Good
15.46 points
Systems and staff members needed in the design and implementation process are discussed. The role of the advanced registered nurse in promoting evidence-based practice and leading quality and performance improvement initiatives within this setting is discussed.

3. 3: Satisfactory
14.78 points
Systems and staff members needed in the design and implementation process are generally discussed. The general role of the advanced registered nurse in promoting evidence-based practice and leading quality and performance improvement initiatives within this setting is summarized.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
13.44 points
Systems and staff members needed in the design and implementation process only partially discussed.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Systems and staff members needed in the design and implementation process are omitted.

Outline Strategies for Implementing EHR Proposal
21 points
Criteria Description
Outline Strategies for Implementing EHR Proposal

5. 5: Excellent
21 points
Strategies for implementing the new EHR proposal are detailed. Communication changes, transitioning to the new EHR and managing human, fiscal, and health care resources, are thoroughly discussed.

4. 4: Good
19.32 points
Strategies for implementing the new EHR proposal are outlined. Communication changes, transitioning to the new EHR and managing human, fiscal, and health care resources, are generally discussed.

3. 3: Satisfactory
18.48 points
General strategies for implementing the new EHR proposal are presented. Some general communication changes, transitioning to the new EHR and managing human, fiscal, and health care resources, are summarized.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
16.8 points
Strategies for implementing the new EHR proposal are only partially discussed.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Strategies for implementing the new EHR proposal are omitted.

Professional, Ethical, and Regulatory Standards Implementation (B)
21 points
Criteria Description
Professional, Ethical, and Regulatory Standards Implementation (C5.2)

5. 5: Excellent
21 points
A description of the professional, ethical, and regulatory standards used to design and implement the plan is extremely thorough and includes substantial details.

4. 4: Good
19.32 points
A description of the professional, ethical, and regulatory standards used to design and implement the plan is complete and includes supporting detail.

3. 3: Satisfactory
18.48 points
A description of the professional, ethical, and regulatory standards used to design and implement the plan is included but lacks supporting detail.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
16.8 points
A description of the professional, ethical, and regulatory standards used to design and implement the plan is incomplete or incorrect.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
A description of the professional, ethical, and regulatory standards used to design and implement the plan is not included.

Evaluation of the Success of EHR Implementation
21 points
Criteria Description
Evaluation of the Success of EHR Implementation

5. 5: Excellent
21 points
Clear measures and steps needed to evaluate the success of the EHR implementation from a staff, setting, and patient perspective to measure effectiveness and ensure continuous quality improvement in practice are detailed. The proposed evaluation measures are effective measures and relevant for the EHR implementation.

4. 4: Good
19.32 points
Overall, measures and steps needed to evaluate the success of the EHR implementation from a staff, setting, and patient perspective to measure effectiveness and ensure continuous quality improvement in practice are discussed.

3. 3: Satisfactory
18.48 points
General measures and steps needed to evaluate the success of the EHR implementation from a staff, setting, and patient perspective to measure effectiveness and ensure continuous quality improvement in practice are summarized.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
16.8 points
Measures and steps needed to evaluate the success of the EHR implementation from a staff, setting, and patient perspective to measure effectiveness and ensure continuous quality improvement in practice are only partially discussed.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Measures and steps needed to evaluate the success of the EHR implementation from a staff, setting, and patient perspective to measure effectiveness and ensure continuous quality improvement in practice are omitted.

Leadership Skills and Project Management to Collaborate With Interprofessional Teams (C2.3)
21 points
Criteria Description
Leadership Skills and Project Management to Collaborate With Interprofessional Teams (C2.3)

5. 5: Excellent
21 points
A description of the leadership skills and project management knowledge used to collaborate with the interprofessional team and ensure the facility is providing evidence-based care is extremely thorough and includes substantial details.

4. 4: Good
19.32 points
A description of the leadership skills and project management knowledge used to collaborate with the interprofessional team and ensure the facility is providing evidence-based care is completed and includes supporting detail.

3. 3: Satisfactory
18.48 points
A description of the leadership skills and project management knowledge used to collaborate with the interprofessional team and ensure the facility is providing evidence-based care is included but lacks supporting detail.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
16.8 points
A description of the leadership skills and project management knowledge used to collaborate with the interprofessional team and ensure the facility is providing evidence-based care is incomplete or incorrect.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
A description of the leadership skills and project management knowledge used to collaborate with the interprofessional team and ensure the facility is providing evidence-based care is not included.

Required Sources
6.3 points
Criteria Description
Required Sources

5. 5: Excellent
6.3 points
Number of required resources is met. Sources are current and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

4. 4: Good
5.8 points
Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

3. 3: Satisfactory
5.54 points
Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
5.04 points
Number of required sources is only partially met.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Sources are not included.

Appendix
4.2 points
Criteria Description
Appendix

5. 5: Excellent
4.2 points
The APA Writing Checklist is complete and attached in the appendix. It is clearly evident by the quality of the paper that the APA Writing Checklist was used in development.

4. 4: Good
3.86 points
The APA Writing Checklist is complete and attached in the appendix. It is apparent that the APA Writing Checklist was used in development of the paper.

3. 3: Satisfactory
3.7 points
The APA Writing Checklist is complete and attached in the appendix. The APA Writing Checklist was generally used in development of the paper, but some aspects are inconsistent with the paper format or quality.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
3.36 points
The APA Writing Checklist is attached, but an appendix has not been created. The paper does not reflect the use of the use of the APA Writing Checklist during development.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The appendix and APA Writing Checklist are omitted.

Thesis, Position, or Purpose
14.7 points
Criteria Description
Thesis, Position, or Purpose Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.

5. 5: Excellent
14.7 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is persuasively developed throughout and skillfully directed to a specific audience.

4. 4: Good
13.52 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific audience.

3. 3: Satisfactory
12.94 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately developed. An awareness of the appropriate audience is demonstrated.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
11.76 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident.

Development, Structure, and Conclusion
16.8 points
Criteria Description
Development, Structure, and Conclusion Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development.

5. 5: Excellent
16.8 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is coherently and cohesively advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A convincing and unambiguous conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

4. 4: Good
15.46 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and plausible conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

3. 3: Satisfactory
14.78 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
13.44 points
Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.

Evidence
10.5 points
Criteria Description
Evidence Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives.

5. 5: Excellent
10.5 points
Comprehensive and compelling evidence is included. Multiple other perspectives are integrated effectively.

4. 4: Good
9.66 points
Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Other perspectives are integrated.

3. 3: Satisfactory
9.24 points
Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
8.4 points
Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other perspectives is present.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of the writer.

Mechanics of Writing
10.5 points
Criteria Description
Mechanics of Writing Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.

5. 5: Excellent
10.5 points
No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

4. 4: Good
9.66 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

3. 3: Satisfactory
9.24 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
8.4 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

Format/Documentation
10.5 points
Criteria Description
Format/Documentation Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.

5. 5: Excellent
10.5 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated.

4. 4: Good
9.66 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

3. 3: Satisfactory
9.24 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
8.4 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

Total
210 points