NUR 514 Week 8 Assignment: Benchmark – Electronic Health Record Implementation

NUR 514 Week 8 Assignment: Benchmark – Electronic Health Record Implementation

NUR 514 Week 8 Assignment: Benchmark – Electronic Health Record Implementation

Assessment Description

One way informatics can be especially valuable is in capturing data to inspire improvements and quality change in practice. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) collects data related to adverse events and safety concerns. If you are working within a practice setting to implement a new electronic health record (EHR) system, this is just one of the many considerations your team would need to plan for during the rollout process.

In a paper of 1,500-1,750 words, discuss the following:
Consider an opportunity for tracking care improvement. What key information would be needed in the database? Example: Time lapse from medication order documented in the EHR to delivery of medication to the patient for the cardiology service.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NUR 514 Week 8 Assignment: Benchmark – Electronic Health Record Implementation HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

Describe the role informatics plays in the ability to capture this data. What type of project management strategies and methodologies can be implemented to support informatics initiatives to help improve quality within the clinical practice?

Discuss which systems and staff members would need to be involved in the design and implementation process. What is the role of the advanced registered nurse in promoting evidence-based practice and leading quality and performance improvement initiatives within this setting?

Outline strategies for implementing the new EHR proposal. Consider communication changes, transitioning to the new EHR, and managing resources (human, fiscal, and health care resources).

Discuss what professional, ethical, and regulatory standards must be incorporated into the design and implementation of the system.

Describe the measures and steps you would take to evaluate the success of the EHR implementation from a staff, setting, and patient perspective to measure effectiveness and ensure continuous quality improvement in practice?

Explain what leadership skills and theories would be needed to facilitate collaboration with the interprofessional team and provide evidence-based, patient-centered care?

You are required to cite five to 10 sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

Complete the “APA Writing Checklist” to ensure that your paper adheres to APA style and formatting criteria and general guidelines for academic writing. Include the completed checklist as an appendix at the end of your paper.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:

MBA-MSN; MSN-Nursing Education; MSN Acute Care Nurse Practitioner-Adult-Gerontology; MSN Family Nurse Practitioner; MSN-Health Informatics; MSN-Health Care Quality and Patient Safety; MSN-Leadership in Health Care Systems; MSN-Public Health Nursing

2.3: Develop leadership skills to collaborate on interprofessional teams in the provision of evidence-based, patient-centered care.

5.2: Apply professional, ethical, and regulatory standards of practice in the provision of safe, effective health care.

Attachments

MSN-APA Writing Checklist-Student.docx

Skip to main contentEnable accessibility for visually impairedOpen the accessibility menuOpen the Accessible Navigation Menu

Benchmark – Electronic Health Record Implementation Paper – Rubric

LISTGRID

PRINT TO PDF

Rubric Criteria

Total210 points

Criterion
1. Unsatisfactory

2. Insufficient

3. Approaching

4. Acceptable

5. Target

Opportunity for Tracking Care Improvement

Opportunity for Tracking Care Improvement

0 points

Opportunity for tracking care improvement is not discussed.

16.8 points

Opportunity for tracking care improvement is only partially discussed.

18.48 points

Opportunity for tracking care improvement is generally discussed. Some key information needed for the database is summarized.

19.32 points

Opportunity for tracking care improvement is discussed. Key information needed for the database is presented.

21 points

Opportunity for tracking care improvement is thoroughly discussed. Key information needed for the database is accurate and clearly presented. The narrative provides insight and is well supported.

Role Informatics Plays in Ability to Capture Data

Role Informatics Plays in Ability to Capture Data
0 points

The role informatics plays in the ability to capture specified data is omitted.
11.76 points

The role informatics plays in the ability to capture specified data is only partially discussed.

12.94 points

The role informatics plays in the ability to capture specified data is summarized. Some general project management strategies and methodologies to implement and support informatics initiatives and help improve quality within the clinical practice are presented.
13.52 points

The role informatics plays in the ability to capture specified data is described. Project management strategies and methodologies to implement and support informatics initiatives and help improve quality within the clinical practice are presented.

14.7 points

The role informatics plays in the ability to capture specified data is clearly described. Project management strategies and methodologies to implement and support informatics initiatives and help improve quality within the clinical practice are discussed. The narrative is insightful and well supported.

Systems and Staff Members Needed in Design and Implementation Process

Systems and Staff Members Needed in Design and Implementation Process

0 points

Systems and staff members needed in the design and implementation process are omitted.

13.44 points

Systems and staff members needed in the design and implementation process only partially discussed.

14.78 points

Systems and staff members needed in the design and implementation process are generally discussed. The general role of the advanced registered nurse in promoting evidence-based practice and leading quality and performance improvement initiatives within this setting is summarized.
15.46 points

Systems and staff members needed in the design and implementation process are discussed. The role of the advanced registered nurse in promoting evidence-based practice and leading quality and performance improvement initiatives within this setting is discussed.

16.8 points

Systems and staff members needed in the design and implementation process are detailed. The role of the advanced registered nurse in promoting evidence-based practice and leading quality and performance improvement initiatives within this setting is thoroughly discussed. The narrative is well developed and demonstrates a clear understanding of the design and implementation process.

Outline Strategies for Implementing EHR Proposal

Outline Strategies for Implementing EHR Proposal

0 points

Strategies for implementing the new EHR proposal are omitted.

16.8 points

Strategies for implementing the new EHR proposal are only partially discussed.
18.48 points

General strategies for implementing the new EHR proposal are presented. Some general communication changes, transitioning to the new EHR and managing human, fiscal, and health care resources, are summarized.

19.32 points

Strategies for implementing the new EHR proposal are outlined. Communication changes, transitioning to the new EHR and managing human, fiscal, and health care resources, are generally discussed.

21 points

Strategies for implementing the new EHR proposal are detailed. Communication changes, transitioning to the new EHR and managing human, fiscal, and health care resources, are thoroughly discussed.

Professional, Ethical, and Regulatory Standards Implementation (B)

Professional, Ethical, and Regulatory Standards Implementation (C5.2)

0 points

A description of the professional, ethical, and regulatory standards used to design and implement the plan is not included.

16.8 points

A description of the professional, ethical, and regulatory standards used to design and implement the plan is incomplete or incorrect.
18.48 points

A description of the professional, ethical, and regulatory standards used to design and implement the plan is included but lacks supporting detail.
19.32 points

A description of the professional, ethical, and regulatory standards used to design and implement the plan is complete and includes supporting detail.

21 points

A description of the professional, ethical, and regulatory standards used to design and implement the plan is extremely thorough and includes substantial details.

Evaluation of the Success of EHR Implementation

Evaluation of the Success of EHR Implementation

0 points

Measures and steps needed to evaluate the success of the EHR implementation from a staff, setting, and patient perspective to measure effectiveness and ensure continuous quality improvement in practice are omitted.

16.8 points

Measures and steps needed to evaluate the success of the EHR implementation from a staff, setting, and patient perspective to measure effectiveness and ensure continuous quality improvement in practice are only partially discussed.
18.48 points

General measures and steps needed to evaluate the success of the EHR implementation from a staff, setting, and patient perspective to measure effectiveness and ensure continuous quality improvement in practice are summarized
19.32 points

Overall, measures and steps needed to evaluate the success of the EHR implementation from a staff, setting, and patient perspective to measure effectiveness and ensure continuous quality improvement in practice are discussed.

21 points

Clear measures and steps needed to evaluate the success of the EHR implementation from a staff, setting, and patient perspective to measure effectiveness and ensure continuous quality improvement in practice are detailed. The proposed evaluation measures are effective measures and relevant for the EHR implementation.

Leadership Skills and Project Management to Collaborate With Interprofessional Teams (B)

Leadership Skills and Project Management to Collaborate With Interprofessional Teams (C2.3)

0 points

A description of the leadership skills and project management knowledge used to collaborate with the interprofessional team and ensure the facility is providing evidence-based care is not included.

16.8 points

A description of the leadership skills and project management knowledge used to collaborate with the interprofessional team and ensure the facility is providing evidence-based care is incomplete or incorrect.

18.48 points

A description of the leadership skills and project management knowledge used to collaborate with the interprofessional team and ensure the facility is providing evidence-based care is included but lacks supporting detail.
19.32 points

A description of the leadership skills and project management knowledge used to collaborate with the interprofessional team and ensure the facility is providing evidence-based care is completed and includes supporting detail.

21 points

A description of the leadership skills and project management knowledge used to collaborate with the interprofessional team and ensure the facility is providing evidence-based care is extremely thorough and includes substantial details.

Required Sources

Required Sources

0 points

Sources are not included.
5.04 points

Number of required sources is only partially met.
5.54 points

Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate.

5.8 points

Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

6.3 points

Number of required resources is met. Sources are current and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

Appendix

Appendix

0 points

The appendix and APA Writing Checklist are omitted.

3.36 points

The APA Writing Checklist is attached, but an appendix has not been created. The paper does not reflect the use of the use of the APA Writing Checklist during development.

3.7 points

The APA Writing Checklist is complete and attached in the appendix. The APA Writing Checklist was generally used in development of the paper, but some aspects are inconsistent with the paper format or quality.

3.86 points

The APA Writing Checklist is complete and attached in the appendix. It is apparent that the APA Writing Checklist was used in development of the paper.
4.2 points

The APA Writing Checklist is complete and attached in the appendix. It is clearly evident by the quality of the paper that the APA Writing Checklist was used in development.

Thesis Development and Purpose

Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.
0 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident.
11.76 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.
12.94 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately developed. An awareness of the appropriate audience is demonstrated.
13.52 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific audience.
14.7 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is persuasively developed throughout and skillfully directed to a specific audience.

Development, Structure, and Conclusion

Development, Structure, and Conclusion Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development.

0 points

No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.

13.44 points

Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.
14.78 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

15.46 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and plausible conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

16.8 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is coherently and cohesively advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A convincing and unambiguous conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

Evidence

Evidence Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives.
0 points

Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of the writer.

8.4 points

Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other perspectives is present.
9.24 points

Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.
9.66 points

Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Other perspectives are integrated.

10.5 points

Comprehensive and compelling evidence is included. Multiple other perspectives are integrated effectively.

Mechanics of Writing

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.

0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
8.4 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
9.24 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

9.66 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used

10.5 points

No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

Format/Documentation

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.
0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

8.4 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.
9.24 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.
9.66 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
10.5 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated.

© 2023. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

A Sample Of This Assignment Written By One Of Our Top-rated Writers

Benchmark- Electronic Health Record Implementation Paper

Health care delivery evolves in multiple dimensions as nursing professionals and stakeholders invent new strategies for addressing complex patient needs. Central to this advancement is nursing informatics, which involves synthesizing nursing, information, and computer sciences to manage and communicate data and information (McGonigle & Mastrian, 2021). Nursing informatics enables providers to integrate tools, technologies, and methods to collect, analyze, and apply vast health care data. Such improved capabilities empower nurses to implement electronic health records (EHRs) for improved patient outcomes. The purpose of this paper is to describe the process of implementing a new EHR within a practice setting purposed to capture data to inspire improvements and quality change.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NUR 514 Week 8 Assignment: Benchmark – Electronic Health Record Implementation HERE

Opportunity for Tracking Care Improvement

Opportunities for tracking care improvement are characterized by intensive and accurate data collection, analysis, and management to address performance gaps. A suitable opportunity in the current practice where EHR implementation would be highly beneficial is using real-time data to identify high-risk patients to prevent 30-day unscheduled readmission. According to Ashfaq et al. (2019), precise readmission risk prediction could effectively guide health care practitioners in deciding whether a patient is ready for discharge or should be enrolled in an intervention program. An EHR-driven prediction model would enable the health care facility to collect the relevant data when the patient is receiving care to predict the readmission probability at discharge.

The problematic nature of readmissions requires nursing practitioners to have timely, accurate, and sufficient data for informed decision-making. A database is critical to operations management since it promotes precise, consistent data storage. In the present tech-based nursing, the sequence of primary care visits usually represents the patient in an EHR. In this case, the most critical data is what identifies patients and their health conditions. Ashfaq et al. (2019) categorized this data into demographic features and the patient’s clinical state. Demographic features include the patient’s age, gender, residence, and the type of visit. Clinical state data include lab results, diagnoses, and vitals recorded during an inpatient visit.

Role Informatics Plays in Ability to Capture Data

Informatics is the spine for data-driven nursing and informed use of innovative technological systems for high-quality care. Among many roles, informatics enables nurses and other health care staff to collect timely data in different formats from multiple sources. Nursing informatics facilitates the safe storage of essential data since it can be backed up by ensuring it is available in multiple devices and systems. As Dash et al. (2019) mentioned, nursing informatics facilitates data organization during collection for easy analysis. Such organization is witnessed when patient’s clinical data is matched with their needs. Generally, informatics makes data readily available for decision-making and ensures care providers can access it in multiple formats as situations necessitate.

Implementing electronic health systems is intensive since they consume time and resources. Applying the appropriate project management strategies and methodologies can effectively support informatics initiatives to improve quality within the clinical practice. Valuable strategies to manage and implement complex projects include goal-oriented leadership and utilizing a work breakdown structure. Visionary leadership allows a team to work together for a common goal. It prevents potential conflicts when executing projects by clarifying roles and supervising progress. Alam and Gühl (2022) described a work breakdown structure as organizing the work into manageable sections. These sections (smaller components) allow efficient resource allocation, planning, and evaluation of key deliverables.

Leaders apply different project management methodologies depending on the scope and type of work involved. Inevitably, nursing informatics projects require precision and integration of models that promote efficient resource utilization. The waterfall methodology can be used to support informatics initiatives. Rubio (2022) represented the waterfall model as flowing the project’s phases downward. Nurse leaders and other health care staff implementing change must complete one project’s phase before moving to the next. The other methodology is the agile approach, characterized by adaptive work management and project planning (Rubio, 2022). In this method, quality improvement leaders are open to change and embrace a flexible management approach to realize the targeted goals.

Systems and Staff Members Needed in Design and Implementation Process

Effective EHR implementation combines multiple systems, staff members, and skills. A health information system would be critical since it helps care providers gather, organize, and collect data to improve health outcomes and reduce costs. A robust technological system is also necessary to ensure the new EHR captures, analyzes, and shares data safely. Regarding staff members, the nurse informaticist should be involved in all critical phases, including design and implementation. According to McGonigle and Mastrian (2021), nurse informaticists combine clinical skills and health information technology (IT) to guide organizations in advancing technology to improve care quality. Their skills and guidance are essential for positive outcomes as far as the system’s design and implementation are concerned. Other staff members include system designers, physicians, departmental leaders, and IT technicians.

The advanced registered nurse is critical in promoting evidence-based practice and leading quality and performance improvement initiatives within this setting. One such role is serving as a change agent to address performance gaps. Change agents use their clinical and analytical skills in nursing to identify areas where the desired goals are not achieved (Ericson-Lidman & Strandberg, 2021). In response, they propose evidence-based interventions to reduce the gap between the achieved and desired health outcomes. The advanced registered nurse is also responsible for policy change and advocacy. Nsiah et al. (2019) illustrated patient advocacy as promoting patient safety and high-quality care by protecting patients and advancing their interests. The nurse plays similar roles by designing interventions for improving patient safety and achieving high-quality care, like burnout reduction programs, environmental modification strategies, and patient monitoring via telehealth. The organization fosters a culture of change to encourage innovative projects.

Strategies for Implementing EHR Proposal

Implementing a new EHR system could be seamless or challenging, depending on the approaches used in critical phases. As Aguirre et al. (2019) stated, the entire process commences with an in-depth evaluation of the workflows, followed by defining preferences and user needs. In the proposed project, such needs include software, hardware, and user requirements to ensure the EHR runs efficiently and executes its roles as expected. The next step is communication to ensure clinicians and all targeted users understand the purpose of the new EHR and how to use it in predicting and preventing readmissions. Aguirre et al. (2019) further recommended staff education to equip users with the foundational knowledge for safe and effective EHR use. Transition to the new EHR should happen after piloting and when all user needs are addressed. To ensure effective management of resources, teamwork should be embraced at all levels. Nurses should also be trained in groups to save time and training resources.

Professional, Ethical, and Regulatory Standards Implementation

EHRs are characterized by massive data collection, storage, and exchange between providers. Adherence to the established standards is critical for safe and competent use. Professional standards for the system’s design and implementation include EHR usability and interoperability. Usability denotes an easy-to-use system that allows nursing professionals to perform different tasks accurately and with minimal effort. Li et al. (2021) illustrated interoperability as health information systems’ ability to work together within and across organizational boundaries to facilitate effective patient care. Interoperable systems promote safe and quick information exchange between care providers. A lack of interoperability increases clinician workload and is a key barrier to patient safety.

Ethical standards in the design and implementation of the new EHR are centered on privacy, security, and confidentiality essentials. To promote these principles and ensure data integrity, EHR systems should have the appropriate technical and physical safeguards for data protection (Basil et al., 2022). Regulatory considerations have much to do with using certified EHR technology. Certified technology that allows clinicians to store data in a structured format facilitates efficient data capturing and sharing (CMS.gov, 2023). Such structuring enables nursing professionals to retrieve and transfer patient data easily for improved patient outcomes.

Evaluation of the Success of EHR Implementation

EHR implementation is cumbersome since it introduces new technologies, tools, and processes into routine patient care. Evaluation is critical to determining whether the project achieved the desired goals (Hamilton et al., 2020). From a staff perspective, the new EHR should enable nurses to track and respond to potential readmissions more effectively. A post-implementation feasibility study can help to determine how the EHR empowers nurses to achieve better outcomes. From a setting perspective, the new EHR should reduce costs associated with readmissions. As a result, a comparative analysis of the readmissions rate six months before and after its implementation would be an accurate reference point. To patients, implementing the new EHR would reduce readmissions and improve care experiences. To ensure continuous quality improvement in practice, nurses should be regularly trained on key aspects of the system, including usage, security, and ethical compliance. The system should also be upgraded as situations oblige to optimize capacity and secure it from emerging security threats.

Leadership Skills and Project Management to Collaborate with Interprofessional Teams

Interprofessional teams comprise members with diverse skills, values, and work approaches. Leadership skills to enable such teams to collaborate and provide evidence-based, patient-centered care include clear goals, respect, and active engagement of members. Respect and engagement foster a culture of inclusion, enabling a diverse workforce to work together to achieve a shared goal (Stanford, 2020). Clear goals, open communication, and problem-solving are valuable project management skills for an interprofessional team to collaborate and provide evidence-based, patient-centered care. Leadership theories also guide nursing professionals in change management and decision-making regarding effective patient care. The adaptive leadership theory underlines supporting staff competencies to achieve patient-centered care (Kuluski et al., 2021). Adaptive leadership is founded on the precept that different situations require different skills, knowledge, and approaches. A similar approach is crucial in the complex nursing environment to deliver the best possible patient care.

 Conclusion

Nursing informatics has improved organizations’ capacity to use data and technologies to improve patient care. EHRs contain patient data in electronic formats for quick access, sharing, and decision-making. A new opportunity for EHR implementation should enable nurses to use data and technologies to achieve higher outcomes for patients, health care staff, and the organization. A new EHR system for readmission prediction and prevention is crucial for the organization to prevent adverse outcomes of readmissions.

References

Aguirre, R. R., Suarez, O., Fuentes, M., & Sanchez-Gonzalez, M. A. (2019). Electronic health record implementation: a review of resources and tools. Cureus, 11(9), e5649. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.5649

Alam, D., & Gühl, U. (2022). Project management for practice: a guide and toolbox for successful projects. Springer.

Ashfaq, A., Sant’Anna, A., Lingman, M., & Nowaczyk, S. (2019). Readmission prediction using deep learning on electronic health records. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 97, 103256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103256

Basil, N. N., Ambe, S., Ekhator, C., & Fonkem, E. (2022). Health records database and inherent security concerns: a review of the literature. Cureus, 14(10), e30168. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.30168

CMS.gov. (2023). Certified EHR technology. https://www.cms.gov/medicare/regulations-guidance/promoting-interoperability-programs/certified-ehr-technology

Dash, S., Shakyawar, S. K., Sharma, M., & Kaushik, S. (2019). Big data in healthcare: management, analysis and future prospects. Journal of Big Data, 6(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-019-0217-0

Ericson-Lidman, E., & Strandberg, G. (2021). Change agents’ experiences of implementing a new organizational culture in residential care for older people: a qualitative study. Nordic Journal of Nursing Research, 41(3), 149-157. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057158521995994

Hamilton, S., Jennings, A., & Forster, A. J. (2020). Development and evaluation of a quality improvement framework for healthcare. International Journal for Quality in Health Care: journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 32(7), 456–463. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzaa075

Kuluski, K., Reid, R. J., & Baker, G. R. (2021). Applying the principles of adaptive leadership to person‐centred care for people with complex care needs: Considerations for care providers, patients, caregivers and organizations. Health Expectations, 24(2), 175-181. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13174

Li, E., Clarke, J., Neves, A. L., Ashrafian, H., & Darzi, A. (2021). Electronic health records, interoperability and patient safety in health systems of high-income countries: a systematic review protocol. BMJ Open, 11(7), e044941. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044941

McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. (2021). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge. Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Nsiah, C., Siakwa, M., & Ninnoni, J. P. K. (2019). Registered Nurses’ description of patient advocacy in the clinical setting. Nursing Open, 6(3), 1124–1132. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.307

Rubio, M. (2022). The mini book of agile: everything you really need to know about agile, agile project management and agile delivery. Packt Publishing.

Stanford, F. C. (2020). The importance of diversity and inclusion in the healthcare workforce. Journal of the National Medical Association, 112(3), 247–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnma.2020.03.014

Appendices

Appendix A: APA Writing Checklist

Use this document as a checklist for each paper you will write throughout your GCU graduate program. Follow specific instructions indicated in the assignment and use this checklist to help ensure correct grammar and APA formatting. Refer to the APA resources available in the GCU Library and Student Success Center.

☒ APA paper template (located in the Student Success Center/Writing Center) is utilized for the correct format of the paper. APA style is applied, and format is correct throughout.

☒  The title page is present. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.

☒ The introduction is present. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.

☒ Topic is well defined.

☒ Strong thesis statement is included in the introduction of the paper.

☒ The thesis statement is consistently threaded throughout the paper and included in the conclusion.

☒ Paragraph development: Each paragraph has an introductory statement, two or three sentences as the body of the paragraph, and a transition sentence to facilitate the flow of information. The sections of the main body are organized to reflect the main points of the author. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.

☒ All sources are cited. APA style and format are correctly applied and are free from error.

☒ Sources are completely and correctly documented on a References page, as appropriate to assignment and APA style, and format is free of error.

Scholarly Resources: Scholarly resources are written with a focus on a specific subject discipline and usually written by an expert in the same subject field. Scholarly resources are written for an academic audience.

Examples of Scholarly Resources include: Academic journals, books written by experts in a field, and formally published encyclopedias and dictionaries.

Peer-Reviewed Journals: Peer-reviewed journals are evaluated prior to publication by experts in the journal’s subject discipline. This process ensures that the articles published within the journal are academically rigorous and meet the required expectations of an article in that subject discipline.

Empirical Journal Article: This type of scholarly resource is a subset of scholarly articles that reports the original finding of an observational or experimental research study. Common aspects found within an empirical article include: literature review, methodology, results, and discussion.

Adapted from “Evaluating Resources: Defining Scholarly Resources,” located in Research Guides in the GCU Library.

☒ The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. Utilize writing resources such as Grammarly, LopesWrite report, and ThinkingStorm to check your writing.