NURS 6052 Module 5 Week Learning Resources Essay

NURS 6052 Module 5 Week Learning Resources Essay

NURS 6052 Module 5 Week Learning Resources Essay

Bedside nurses should be the key providers involved in making practice change decisions since they are involved in implementing and evaluating clinical decisions. Decision-making is vital to nursing practice, and providers must consider multiple, potentially competing factors when making decisions to meet patients’ health needs (Nibbelink & Brewer, 2018). Considering the relationship of bedside nurses with patients and their unique expertise, they are increasingly becoming important for and complemental to physicians’ role in decision-making on treatment interventions. Besides, bedside nurses spend much time with patients, thus significantly affecting patients’ care experiences (Nibbelink & Brewer, 2018). It is thus important to involve them in decision-making since they understand the problems affecting patients, the influential factors within the nursing work environment, and the interventions that can address these issues.

BUY A CUSTOM-PAPER HERE ON; NURS 6052 Module 5 Week Learning Resources Essay

The decisions bedside nurses make concerning nursing care influence their effectiveness in clinical practice, impacting patients’ lives and experiences with health care. For instance, involving bedside nurses in clinical decision-making is associated with positive patient outcomes, including fewer complications, higher nurse-perceived quality of patient care, reduced patient mortality, and lower job strain and burnout (Marques-Pinto et al., 2018). This reduces nurses’ burnout and job dissatisfaction, which reduces turnover rates and nursing shortages.

Involving nurses in decision-making aligns with the recommendations for creating and sustaining a culture of safety, like non-hierarchical communication and decision-making strategies. It empowers nurses to participate in decisions that impact their work processes. By ensuring bedside nurses are involved in decision-making, hospital leaders improve the organizations’ ability to attract and retain nurses and create a positive patient safety climate that fosters high-quality patient care (Marques-Pinto et al., 2018). Therefore, healthcare leaders, especially nurse leaders, can improve patient safety in their organizations by creating a decisional involvement professional practice environment for bedside nurses.

References

Marques-Pinto, A., Jesus, É. H., Mendes, A. M. O. C., Fronteira, I., & Roberto, M. S. (2018). Nurses’ intention to leave the organization: a mediation study of professional burnout and engagement. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 21. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2018.30

Nibbelink, C. W., & Brewer, B. B. (2018). Decision-making in nursing practice: An integrative literature review. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 27(5-6), 917–928. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14151

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE ON; NURS 6052 Module 5 Week Learning Resources Essay

Developing a Culture of Evidence-Based Practice Dissemination is the targeted distribution of information and intervention materials to a target clinical practice or public health audience (Brownson et al., 2018). My preferred dissemination strategies include disseminating information on the organization’s website and publishing project findings in peer-reviewed journals. The website would be preferred since the web is a highly cost-effective dissemination channel for the organization, and access to the data is fast and simultaneous for users (Ross-Hellauer et al., 2020). Publishing in peer-reviewed journals would also be preferred since it ensures that the information is permanently available to the broadest possible audience across the globe. My least preferred dissemination strategies include presenting study findings at national conferences of professional associations and discussing the project on the local radio. Although presentation at conferences and meetings allows for rapid dissemination of results, I would not prefer it because the audience is usually narrow, and the depth of information that can be provided in this method is limited (Brownson et al., 2020). For example, if I present at the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses conference, other NPs, RNs, and healthcare professionals would be excluded. Furthermore, presenting the study findings on local radio may not be ideal since it reaches a limited audience (Ashcraft et al., 2020). Besides, presentation on local radio is time-limited, and there are many interruptions for commercial breaks. Potential barriers when disseminating through the organization’s website include the lack of a well-built website that is easily accessible and with an easy user interface design. Access to the website may also be restricted to a particular geographic location, which can limit access to the information to individuals globally. The website barriers can be mitigated by involving the IT team in developing an easy-to-use website and removing access restrictions (Ross-Hellauer et al., 2020). Furthermore, obstacles to publishing data in peer-reviewed journals include delays with the publication by reviewers and rejection of the study findings (Ashcraft et al., 2020). This can be addressed by creating a transparent process where the identities of the author and reviewers are known. References Ashcraft, L. E., Quinn, D. A., & Brownson, R. C. (2020). Strategies for effective dissemination of research to United States policymakers: a systematic review. Implementation Science: IS, 15(1), 89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-020-01046-3 Brownson, R. C., Eyler, A. A., Harris, J. K., Moore, J. B., & Tabak, R. G. (2018). Research full report: getting the word out: new approaches for disseminating public health science. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 24(2), 102. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000000673 Ross-Hellauer, T., Tennant, J. P., BanelytÄ—, V., Gorogh, E., Luzi, D., Kraker, P., Pisacane, L., Ruggieri, R., Sifacaki, E., & Vignoli, M. (2020). Ten simple rules for innovative dissemination of research. PLoS Computational Biology, 16(4), e1007704. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007704