One thing in life we cannot control is nature. What would your organization do if there was a natural disaster that destroyed electrical lines and internet servers? How would you take care of your patients if you could not access the EMR for a week or more? What recommendations can you make for improvement?
One thing in life we cannot control is nature. What would your organization do if there was a natural disaster that destroyed electrical lines and internet servers? How would you take care of your patients if you could not access the EMR for a week or more? What recommendations can you make for improvement?
The inherent unpredictability and lack of control over natural phenomena are fundamental aspects of life. As technology progresses, healthcare organizations that heavily rely on digital systems find themselves susceptible to the impact of natural disasters (Abernethy et al., 2022). Whether it be power outages caused by hurricanes or data centers destroyed by earthquakes, these catastrophic events pose a significant risk to the seamless operation of Electronic Medical Records. Consequently, an essential question emerges: How can healthcare entities guarantee uninterrupted patient care when access to EMRs is prolonged?
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE ON;One thing in life we cannot control is nature. What would your organization do if there was a natural disaster that destroyed electrical lines and internet servers? How would you take care of your patients if you could not access the EMR for a week or more? What recommendations can you make for improvement?
It is imperative to acknowledge that despite the transformative impact of electronic medical records on the healthcare sector, characterized by enhanced efficiency and comprehensive data storage capabilities, it is essential to anticipate and prepare for unforeseen events. Under the widely recognized adage “Hope for the best, prepare for the worst,” enterprises must contemplate alternative approaches to maintaining records as a precaution against potential natural calamities. While adopting traditional paper-based systems may appear to be a cumbersome process, it can provide significant advantages that are highly important (Otokiti et al., 2020). One possible approach could entail regularly generating patient summaries and their subsequent secure storage as a contingency measure. This methodology guarantees the availability of critical patient data, including medical histories, allergies, and ongoing treatment regimens, irrespective of any interruptions caused by electronic medical record (EMR) system downtimes or other emergencies.
The provision of comprehensive training in both digital and analog patient care modalities is of utmost importance for healthcare workers. Although the increasing prevalence of digital databases may imply that traditional procedures are becoming outdated, Stoumpos et al. (2023) underscores the significance of imparting healthcare practitioners with the requisite knowledge and tools to deliver good care even without technology. This measure guarantees the continuity of patient treatment in the event of technological malfunctions. Furthermore, the significance of prioritizing resilient communication methods should not be overlooked. In circumstances where technical systems encounter failures, effective communication among healthcare teams and between healthcare providers and patients is critical in facilitating the delivery of efficient healthcare services. The allocation of resources towards acquiring disaster-resistant communication equipment, such as satellite phones, facilitates the efficient coordination of medical professionals, the mobilization of essential resources, and the provision of timely care for critical cases, mainly when there is a widespread breakdown of infrastructure.
In addition to the foundational steps outlined above, healthcare organizations must adopt a proactive approach. Conducting regular drills that simulate EMR outages can effectively prepare staff and identify areas in need of improvement. The impact of such preparation was evident during Hurricane Katrina when healthcare facilities that had conducted routine emergency preparedness drills were better equipped to handle the ensuing chaos (Lane, 2021). Furthermore, establishing partnerships with nearby healthcare facilities, ideally located in different geographic regions, can significantly enhance an organization’s resilience. These collaborative agreements enable temporary migration or sharing of patient data during localized disasters and ensure continuity of care.
Recommendations
In the pursuit of achieving optimal management of patient data, hospitals may contemplate the integration of hybrid systems. Instead of eliminating paper records, employing a mixed strategy enables retaining vital patient information in a tangible form, serving as a critical contingency measure. Simultaneously, implementing cloud-based backup systems, particularly those distributed across several geographical areas, provides a protective standard for the preservation and immediate accessibility of electronic medical records. Moreover, it is imperative to design and regularly update emergency response protocols to enhance the efficacy of addressing prospective crises. The protocols, designed expressly for technology disruptions, offer a systematic and practical approach to addressing unexpected issues.
Conclusion
Although the extensive adoption of technology within the healthcare industry ushers in an era of effectiveness and enhanced patient care, it poses a few risks. The robustness of healthcare systems will be judged not only by their technological capability but also by their adaptation and resilience in the face of adversity in a world where natural calamities continue to be an uncontrolled variable. Cloud backups and hybrid systems are promising, but human factors like training, preparedness, and partnerships determine patient care continuity and quality. An effective way to remember this is through the example of Hurricane Katrina. Healthcare institutions can endure nature’s unpredictable nature if they embrace a balanced adoption of the old and the new as we move forward into a more digital world, along with a proactive and prepared mindset.
References
Abernethy, A., Adams, L., Barrett, M., Bechtel, C., Brennan, P., Butte, A., Faulkner, J., Fontaine, E., Friedhoff, S., Halamka, J., Howell, M., Johnson, K., Long, P., McGraw, D., Miller, R., Lee, P., Perlin, J., Rucker, D., Sandy, L., & Savage, L. (2022). The promise of digital health: Then, now, and the future. NAM Perspectives, 6(22). https://doi.org/10.31478/202206e
Lane, S. J. (2021). Post-Acute care decision-making in emergency preparedness: A case study of hurricanes florence and michael. Journal of Health Administration Education, 38(3), 769–784. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/aupha/jhae/2021/00000038/00000003/art00008
Otokiti, A., Williams, K. S., & Warsame, L. (2020). Impact of digital divide on the adoption of online patient portals for self-motivated patients. Healthcare Informatics Research, 26(3), 220–228. https://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2020.26.3.220
Stoumpos, A. I., Kitsios, F., & Talias, M. A. (2023). Digital transformation in healthcare: Technology acceptance and its applications. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(4), 3407. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043407