Week 6 Assignment: Designing a Nursing Informatics Project for Your Organization/NURS 8210

Week 6 Assignment: Designing a Nursing Informatics Project for Your Organization/NURS 8210

Week 6 Assignment: Designing a Nursing Informatics Project for Your Organization/NURS 8210

You will use project management tools and strategies to propose how you would support and potentially implement a nursing informatics project. While you may not have the opportunity to implement this proposed project, this project will allow you to apply the skills needed and the considerations that are required in deducing how a project of this scope might take place in your nursing practice. To complete this project, you will define a informatics project that would be beneficial to your healthcare organization or nursing practice. You can discuss this with upper leadership, in your practice or organization, explaining that you will need to design ia proposed informatics project.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE Week 6 Assignment: Designing a Nursing Informatics Project for Your Organization/NURS 8210 HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.

Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

Learning Resources

Required Readings

Devi, D. H., Duraisamy, K., Armghan, A., Alsharari, M., Aliqab, K., Sorathiya, V., Das, S., & Rashid, N. (2023). 5G technology in healthcare and wearable devices: A review

Links to an external site.. Sensors (14248220), 23(5), 2519. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23052519

Kruse, C., Betancourt, J., Ortiz, S., Valdes Luna, S. M., Bamrah, I. K., & Segovia, N. (2019). Barriers to the use of mobile health in improving health outcomes in developing countries: Systematic review

Links to an external site.. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(10), Article e13263. doi:10.2196/13263

Otto, L., Harst, L., Timpel, P., Wollschlaeger, B., Richter, P., & Schlieter, H. (2020). Defining and delimitating telemedicine and related terms – an ontology-based classification

Links to an external site.. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 268, 113–122. doi:10.3233/SHTI200010

Raza, M. M., Venkatesh, K. P., & Kvedar, J. C. (2023). Promoting racial equity in Digital Health: Applying a cross-disciplinary equity framework

Links to an external site.. Npj Digital Medicine, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00747-5

Sen, S., Maity, S., & Das, D. (2020). Turning the body into a wire

Links to an external site.. IEEE Spectrum. https://spectrum.ieee.org/turning-the-body-into-a-wire

Smital, L., Haider, C. R., Vitek, M., Leinveber, P., Jurak, P., Nemcova, A., Smisek, R., Marsanova, L., Provaznik, I., Felton, C. L., Gilbert, B. K., & Holmes, D. R., III (2020). Real-time quality assessment of long-term ECG signals recorded by wearables in free-living conditions

Links to an external site.. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 67(10), 2721–2734. doi:10.1109/TBME.2020.2969719

Yang, X., Wang, X., Li, X., Gu, D., Liang, C., Li, K., Zhang, G., & Zhong, J. (2020). Exploring emerging IoT technologies in smart health research: A knowledge graph analysis

Links to an external site.. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 20, 260. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-01278-9

Wu, M., & Luo, J. (2019). Wearable technology applications in healthcare: A literature review

Links to an external site.. HIMSS. https://www.himss.org/resources/wearable-technology-applications-healthcare-literature-review

Links to an external site.

Document: Sample Paper Template (Word document)
Download Sample Paper Template (Word document)

Optional Resources

Bettencourt, E. (2018). The future of nursing technology is exciting. https://diversitynursing.com/the-future-of-nursing-technology-is-exciting/#:~:text=The%20Future%20of%20Nursing%20Technology%20Is%20Exciting.%20adminericaB,advancements%20in%20medical%20science%2C%20telecommunications%2C%20and%20even%20

Donevant, S. B., Hilfinger Messias, D. K., & Estrada, R. D. (2018). Utilization of mobile applications in collaborative patient-provider monitoring of chronic health conditions: An examination of three theoretical frameworks to guide practice. Journal of Informatics Nursing, 3(2), 6–11.

Goldstein, K. M., Zullig, L. L., Dedert, E. A., Tabriz, A. A., Brearly, T. W., Raitz, G., Sata, S. S., Whited, J. D., Bosworth, H. B., Gordon, A. M., Nagi, A., Williams, J. W., & Gierisch, J. M. (2018). Telehealth interventions designed for women: An evidence map. Journal of General Internal Medicine

Links to an external site., 33(12), 2191–2200. doi:10.1007/s11606-018-4655-8

National Institute on Aging. (2017). NIH initiative tests in-home technology to help older adults age in place

Links to an external site.. https://www.nia.nih.gov/news/nih-initiative-tests-home-technology-help-older-adults-age-place

Williams, J. K., Feero, W. G., Leonard, D. G. B., & Coleman, B. (2017). Implementation science, genomic precision medicine, and improved health: A new path forward? Nursing Outlook

Links to an external site., 65(1), 36–40. doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2016.07.014

ZEBRA Technologies. (n.d.). The future of healthcare: 2022 Hospital vision study: Mobile technology elevates patient care, empowers clinicians and enhances workflows

Links to an external site.. https://www.zebra.com/content/dam/zebra_new_ia/en-us/solutions-verticals/vertical-solutions/healthcare/white-paper/2022-hospital-vision-study-en-global.pdf

The Assignment: (10–11 pages)

This week, you will finalize your proposed Informatics Project, using all documents completed during Weeks 1–4. Be sure that each table or figure is explained with a short text description just before you include the table or figure in your paper (APA 7).

Introduction

Identify and initiate a conversation with a nurse leader at your nursing practice or healthcare organization. Discuss what you will need to develop Scope and Charter Documents.

Conduct a SWOT analysis which will provide information for the Scope and Charter. You can use a Word document and insert a table. Directions can be viewed in the Week 3 media piece, How to Perform a SWOT Analysis, found in this week’s Learning Resources. Some of the content is relevant to both the project for this course as well as organization of your doctoral dissertation. Overall, the first step for any project, work or your dissertation, requires a plan: what you will and will not do. That information is defined in a charter and scope.

Create a visual using the Gap Analysis map of the identified gap, documenting the flow from the point of origin to the destination. After watching the Week 3 media piece, How to do a GAP Analysis, identify the gap and analyze the flow or lack of flow of information as the gap in a process. The visual map will include the flow from the point of origin to the destination.

Create a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) using PowerPoint slides or another method. Be sure to review the media piece, What Is a Work Breakdown Structure? in the Week 3 Learning Resources.

Create a Project Timeline Gantt chart, which defines who is responsible, due dates to start /finish activities. You can find an example on pp. 95–96 of your text, using PowerPoint slides, or another method. Be sure to review the Gantt Charts, Simplified media piece in this week’s Learning Resources.

RACI (responsibility chart) which outlines who will be responsible for which tasks, if working with a team. An example can be found in the Sipes text on pages 102–103.

Communication plan – Include documentation of all communications, status reports, changes made, and next steps, especially if others will be responsible for helping you acquire documents such as IRB site documents if applicable. An example can be found in the Sipes text on page 109 and on pages 141–143.

Risk management plan– After viewing the Week 4 media piece, “Risk Analysis How to Analyze Risks on Your Project,” document the impact of COVID-19 on current processes and potential for change. Be sure to also document how risk may be mitigated if possible. An example can be found in the Sipes text on pages 103–105.

Rationale – Synthesize scholarly literature that supports your proposed project.

Conclusion

Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Sample Paper Template is found in Week 6 Learning Resources. All papers submitted must use this formatting.

Submit your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 6.

submission information

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.
To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK6Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial

Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.

Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

Rubric

NURS_8210_Week6_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_8210_Week6_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Identify and initiate a conversation with a nurse leader at your healthcare organization or nursing practice. Discuss what you will need to develop Scope and Charter documents.

20 to >17.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and clearly identifies that a conversation with a nurse leader at a healthcare organization or nursing practice has occurred…. An accurate and complete project scope document that is detailed and comprehensive is provided with the submission. … An accurate and complete project charter document that is detailed and comprehensive is provided with the submission.

17 to >15.0 pts

Good

The response accurately identifies that a conversation with a nurse leader at a healthcare organization or nursing practice has occurred. … An accurate project scope document is provided with the submission. … An accurate project charter document is provided with the submission.

15 to >12.0 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely identifies that a conversation with a nurse leader at a healthcare organization or nursing practice has occurred. … An inaccurate or vague project scope document is provided with the submission. … An inaccurate or vague project charter document is provided with the submission.

12 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely identifies that a conversation with a nurse leader at a healthcare organization or nursing practice has occurred, or it is missing. … An inaccurate and vague, or incomplete project scope document is provided with the submission, or it is missing. … An inaccurate and vague, or incomplete project charter document is provided with the submission, or it is missing.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Conduct a SWOT analysis which will provide information for the Scope and Charter. * Be sure that each table or figure is explained with a short text description just before you include the table or figure in your paper (APA 7)
25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent

An accurate and complete SWOT analysis that is detailed and comprehensive is provided with the submission.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good

An accurate SWOT analysis is provided with the submission.

19 to >16.0 pts

Fair

An inaccurate or vague SWOT analysis is provided with the submission.

16 to >0 pts

Poor

An inaccurate and vague, or incomplete SWOT analysis is provided with the submission, or it is missing.
25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Create a visual using the Gap Analysis map of the identified gap, documenting the flow from the point of origin to the destination. * Be sure that each table or figure is explained with a short text description just before you include the table or figure in your paper (APA 7)

20 to >17.0 pts

Excellent

An accurate and complete Gap Analysis that is detailed and comprehensive is provided in the submission. … The response accurately and clearly indicates in detail the flow from the point of origin to the destination and fully supports the proposed small nursing informatics project.

17 to >15.0 pts

Good

An accurate Gap Analysis is provided with the submission. … The response accurately indicates the flow from the point of origin to the destination and supports the proposed small nursing informatics project.

15 to >12.0 pts

Fair

An inaccurate or vague Gap Analysis is provided with the submission. … The response inaccurately or vaguely indicates the flow from the point of origin to the destination and may inaccurately or vaguely support the proposed small nursing informatics project.

12 to >0 pts

Poor

An inaccurate and vague, or incomplete Gap Analysis is provided with the submission, or it is missing. … The response inaccurately and vaguely indicates the flow from the point of origin to the destination that does not support the proposed small nursing informatics projects, or it is missing.

20 pts

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE Week 6 Assignment: Designing a Nursing Informatics Project for Your Organization/NURS 8210 HERE

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Create a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS). * Be sure that each table or figure is explained with a short text description just before you include the table or figure in your paper (APA 7)

15 to >12.0 pts

Excellent

An accurate, complete, and detailed Work Breakdown Structure is provided with the submission.

12 to >9.0 pts

Good

An accurate Work Breakdown Structure is provided with the submission.

9 to >6.0 pts

Fair

An inaccurate or vague Work Breakdown Structure is provided with the submission.

6 to >0 pts

Poor

An inaccurate and vague, or incomplete Work Breakdown Structure is provided with the submission, or it is missing.
15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Create a Project Timeline Gantt chart, which defines who is responsible, due dates to start/finish activities. * Be sure that each table or figure is explained with a short text description just before you include the table or figure in your paper (APA 7)
25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent

An accurate and complete Project Timeline Gantt chart that is detailed and comprehensive is provided with the submission. … The response accurately and clearly identifies in detail who is responsible and the due dates to start/finish activities.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good

An accurate Project Timeline and Gantt chart is provided with the submission. … The response accurately identifies who is responsible and the due dates to start/finish activities.

19 to >15.0 pts

Fair

An inaccurate or vague Project Timeline and Gantt chart is provided with the submission. … The response inaccurately or vaguely identifies who is responsible and the due dates to start/finish activities.

15 to >0 pts

Poor

An inaccurate and vague, or incomplete Project Timeline and Gantt chart is provided with the submission, or it is missing. … The response inaccurately and vaguely identifies who is responsible and the due dates to start/finish activities, or it is missing.
25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Create a RACI (responsibility chart), which outlines who will be responsible for which tasks, if working on a team. * Be sure that each table or figure is explained with a short text description just before you include the table or figure in your paper (APA 7)

15 to >12.0 pts

Excellent

An accurate and complete responsibility chart that is detailed and comprehensive is provided with the submission. … The responsibility chart accurately and clearly outlines who will be responsible for which tasks.

12 to >9.0 pts

Good

An accurate responsibility chart is provided with the submission. … The responsibility chart accurately outlines who will be responsible for which tasks.

9 to >6.0 pts

Fair

An inaccurate or vague responsibility chart is provided with the submission. … The responsibility chart inaccurately or vaguely outlines who will be responsible for which tasks.

6 to >0 pts

Poor

An inaccurate and vague, or incomplete responsibility chart is provided with the submission, or it is missing. … The responsibility chart inaccurately and vaguely outlines who will be responsible for which tasks, or it is missing.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Create a communication plan, including documentation of all communications, status reports, changes made, and next steps. * Be sure that each table or figure is explained with a short text description just before you include the table or figure in your paper (APA 7)
20 to >17.0 pts

Excellent

An accurate and complete communication plan that is detailed and comprehensive is provided with the submission.

17 to >15.0 pts

Good

An accurate communication plan is provided with the submission.

15 to >12.0 pts

Fair

An inaccurate or vague communication plan is provided with the submission.

12 to >0 pts

Poor

An inaccurate and vague communication plan is provided with the submission, or it is missing.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Create a risk management plan. * Be sure that each table or figure is explained with a short text description just before you include the table or figure in your paper (APA 7)

15 to >12.0 pts

Excellent

An accurate and complete risk management plan that is detailed and comprehensive is provided with the submission.

12 to >9.0 pts

Good

An accurate risk management plan provided with the submission.

9 to >6.0 pts

Fair

An inaccurate or vague risk management plan is provided with the submission.

6 to >0 pts

Poor

An inaccurate and vague, or incomplete risk management plan is provided with the submission, or it is missing.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Support your rationale for this proposed project with current scholarly evidence (no older than 5 years).
30 to >26.0 pts

Excellent

An accurate and complete review of scholarly evidence that is detailed and comprehensive supporting the rationale for the proposed project.

26 to >22.0 pts

Good

An accurate review of scholarly evidence that supports the rationale for the proposed project.

22 to >17.0 pts

Fair

An inaccurate or vague risk review of scholarly evidence is provided with the submission.

17 to >0 pts

Poor

An inaccurate and vague, or incomplete review of scholarly evidence is provided with the submission, or it is missing.
30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive introduction and conclusion are provided which delineates all required criteria.
5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. … A clear and comprehensive introduction and conclusion are provided which delineates all required criteria.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. … Introduction and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. … Introduction and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. … No introduction or conclusion was provided.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Expression and Formatting – Standard Academic English: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows writing template and correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. Uses Walden template from learning resources.
5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format and writing template with no errors.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors. Uses writing template.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors. Uses writing template.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors or does not use writing template.

5 pts

Total Points: 200