NR 702 Course Discussions & Assignments ( Week 2-8)
NR 702 Course Discussions & Assignments ( Week 2-8)
NR 702A Week 2 Discussion: The DNP Project: The Problem Development and Practice Gap
Purpose
The purpose of this discussion is to introduce your peers to your specific practice problem at the practicum site. Please consider your discussion with organizational key stakeholders, how the problem was identified, and the practice gap that informs your project design.
Instructions
Struggling to meet your deadline ?
Get assistance on
NR 702 Course Discussions & Assignments ( Week 2-8)
done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
Review this week’s readings and provide your response in 150 words or less:
State your practice question in PICOT format.
ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NR 702 Course Discussions & Assignments ( Week 2-8) HERE
Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us
State the title of your Project: The title should inform and engage the reader and must be succinct. The title should include the intervention and the anticipated outcome and may include the population. (Please do not include abbreviations in the title.)
Examine the problem at the practicum site and evaluate the gap in practice you will address with this project.
Find the DNP Project Manuscript Template from the Student Resource Center in Canvas and Upload the blank DNP Project Manuscript Template to this discussion. This is the document you will use for your assignments in NR702.
Use Grammarly and current APA format for the posts. Do not repeat the prompts in the post. Provide respectful and thought-provoking feedback to your student colleagues. Ask for clarification and elaboration if needed.
Please click on the following link to review the DNP Discussion Guidelines on the Student Resource Center program page:
Link (webpage): DNP Discussion GuidelinesLinks to an external site.
Program Competencies
This discussion enables the student to meet the following program competencies:
Integrates scientific underpinnings into everyday clinical practice. (POs 3, 5)
Applies organizational and system leadership skills to affect systemic changes in corporate culture and to promote continuous improvement in clinical outcomes. (PO 6)
Uses analytic methods to translate critically appraised research and other evidence into clinical scholarship for innovative practice improvements. (POs 3, 5)
Appraises current information systems and technologies to improve health care. (POs 6, 7)
Analyzes health care policies to advocate for equitable health care and social justice to all populations and those at risk due to social determinants of health. (POs 2, 9)
Creates a supportive organizational culture for flourishing collaborative teams to facilitate clinical disease prevention and promote population health at all system levels. (PO 8)
Translates a synthesis of research and population data to support preventative care and improve the nation’s health. (PO 1)
Leads others in professional identity, advanced clinical judgment, systems thinking, resilience, and accountability in selecting, implementing, and evaluating clinical care. (POs 1, 4)
Course Outcomes
This discussion enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
Apply effective strategies in project design for managing practice problems in healthcare delivery at the micro, meso, and macro-system levels. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8; POs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9)
Demonstrate project management and leadership skills in the design process for the evidence-based translational science project. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8; POs 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9)
Create collaborative relationships with interprofessional and intraprofessional groups to champion organizational improvements through project design. (PCs 2, 4, 5, 6, 8; POs 2, 4, 6, 8)
NR 702A Week 2 Assignment 1: DNP Project Manuscript Part 1: Title, Introduction, Practice Question, Purpose, Problem, and Problem Significance
Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is to write the first parts of the DNP Project Manuscript. This assignment will allow you to present the project’s purpose with objectives and the problem statement with significance from a global, national, and local/site perspective. This section includes the prevalence of the problem, the healthcare costs, and a description of the organizational need and practice gap related to the problem.
Instructions
**Download the DNP Project Manuscript Template from the DNP Program Resources page.
Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the assignment. Contact your course faculty if you have questions.
The DNP Project Manuscript Part 1 will be graded on the quality of information, use of current statistics and research, Standard English usage and mechanics, APA format, and overall organization based on the required components as summarized in the guidelines and grading criteria/rubric.
Review the grading rubric carefully and consider how to incorporate each required criterion into Part 1 of the DNP Project Manuscript Template.
Review the tutorial on the use of the DNP Project Manuscript Template in this week’s lesson.
Follow the instructions on the template for the purpose, problem, and problem significance. Submit Part 1 of the DNP Project Manuscript.
Title
Bold the title.
The title should inform and engage the reader.
The title should include your intervention and anticipated outcome and may include your population.
The title should be concise and contain fully spelled out words with no abbreviations.
Introduction and Background
Place the title of your project as the heading of this section. The title is bold and centered.
Start the introduction with a powerful statement or two to stimulate the interest of your reader.
Explicitly state that the DNP Project Manuscript concerns an evidence-based intervention to improve healthcare outcomes. Improving healthcare should include variables of quality, safety, effectiveness, patient-centeredness, timeliness, cost, efficiency, and/or equity, and it should include referenced statistics.
Explicitly state the practice problem and the purpose (aim) of the project.
Identify the sections of the entire DNP Project Manuscript Template to transition readers to the entire manuscript. (Students will continue writing in this manuscript in NR705 and NR709).
Problem
Articulate the issue clearly and succinctly and its significance (incidence, prevalence, and/or mortality data) from a global, national, and local perspective. Then, conclude by discussing the problem within the practicum site. (3 paragraphs)
Examine the global or worldwide prevalence, healthcare costs, and impact (mortality and/or other data) of the problem.
Examine the global, national and/or local impact on nurses, quality of care, healthcare organizations, and healthcare equity.
Describe the national prevalence, healthcare costs, and impact (mortality and/or other data) of the problem.
Explain the problem at the practicum site. (If available and applicable also examine the incidence, prevalence, and financial impact.)
Describe what the practicum site has done to address the problem, or state that there is no evidence that the problem has been addressed.
Project Aim and Supporting Objectives
Explain the specific overall aim of the project.
Identify 3-4 measurable objectives of the project that support the aim.
Place the objectives in a sequenced format (a)…, (b)…., (c)…., etc.
Practice Question
Begin this section with a lead-in sentence such as, “The following practice question will serve as the basis for the DNP project:”
After the Lead-in Sentence, include your one-sentence practice question as it is stated on your DNP Practicum Readiness Form- Except do not include the name of the practicum site in the manuscript.
References
Information in this manuscript must be substantiated by citations from current peer-reviewed journals (within the last 5 years).
For the statistical data about incidence, prevalence, and mortality, you may use research and non-research such as government websites and credible national and global organizations such as CDC, AHRQ, World Health Organization, Kaiser Family Foundation, and Robert Wood Johnson. (See resources in the Week 2 Student Lesson Plan.)
In-text citations should align with the reference page.
In-text citations and references must be in the current APA format.
Scholarly Writing Criteria
Submit the paper on the DNP Project Manuscript Template.
Use the headers in the template.
Use the current APA style and format throughout the manuscript.
Use the Chamberlain Guidelines for Writing a Professional Paper (located in Student Resources) to complete this assignment.
Turn on Grammarly to check the grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation as you write. (Note: if you have not already done so, please download the free version at Grammarly.com before construction of the assignment.)
Writing Requirements (APA format)
Length: 2-3 pages (not including title page or references page)
1-inch margins
Double-spaced pages
12-point Times New Roman font or 11-point Arial
Headings & subheadings
In-text citations
Title page
References page (without permalinks)
Standard English usage and mechanics
Organized presentation of ideas
Program Competencie
This assignment enables the student to meet the following program competencies:
Integrates scientific underpinnings into everyday clinical practice. (POs 3, 5)
Applies organizational and system leadership skills to affect systemic changes in corporate culture and to promote continuous improvement in clinical outcomes. (PO 6)
Uses analytic methods to translate critically appraised research and other evidence into clinical scholarship for innovative practice improvements. (POs 3, 5)
Appraises current information systems and technologies to improve health care. (POs 6, 7)
Analyzes health care policies to advocate for equitable health care and social justice to all populations and those at risk due to social determinants of health. (POs 2, 9)
Creates a supportive organizational culture for flourishing collaborative teams to facilitate clinical disease prevention and promote population health at all system levels. (PO 8)
Translates a synthesis of research and population data to support preventative care and improve the nation’s health. (PO 1)
Leads others in professional identity, advanced clinical judgment, systems thinking, resilience, and accountability in selecting, implementing, and evaluating clinical care. (POs 1, 4)
Course Outcomes
This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
Synthesize scientific knowledge, theory, and practice expertise to inform evidence-based practice and impact outcomes. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8; POs 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9)
Design an evidence-based translational science project to address a practice problem. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8; POs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9)
Apply effective strategies in project design for managing practice problems in healthcare delivery at the micro, meso, and macro-system levels. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8; POs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9)
Demonstrate project management and leadership skills in the design process for the evidence-based translational science project. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8; POs 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9)
Create collaborative relationships with interprofessional and intraprofessional groups to champion organizational improvements through project design. (PCs 2, 4, 5, 6, 8; POs 2, 4, 6, 8)
Due Date
By 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday
Late Assignment Policy applies
Rubric
Wk 2 Manuscript Part 1 Rubric
Wk 2 Manuscript Part 1 Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTitle
Requirements:
1. Bold the title.
2. The title should inform and engage the reader.
3. The title can include your population, intervention, and/or anticipated outcome.
4. The title should be concise and contain fully spelled out words with no abbreviations.
5 pts
Includes all requirements and creates an excellent title page.
4 pts
Includes all requirements and creates a sufficient title page.
3 pts
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or creates a basic title page.
0 pts
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides an undeveloped title page.
5 pt
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction and Background
Requirements:
1. Place the title of your project as the heading of this section. The title is bold and centered.
2. Start the introduction with a powerful statement or two to stimulate the interest of your reader.
3. Explicitly state that the DNP Project Manuscript concerns an evidence-based intervention to improve healthcare outcomes. Improving healthcare should include variables of quality, safety, effectiveness, patient-centeredness, timeliness, cost, efficiency, and/or equity, and it should include referenced statistics.
4. Explicitly state the practice problem and the purpose (aim) of the project.
5. Identify the sections of the entire DNP Project Manuscript Template to transition readers to the entire manuscript. (Students will continue writing in this manuscript template in NR705 and NR709).
10 pts
Includes all requirements and provides an in-depth Introduction.
9 pts
Includes all requirements and provides a sufficient Introduction.
8 pts
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial Introduction.
0 pts
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides an undeveloped Introduction.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProblem
Requirements:
1. Articulate the issue clearly and succinctly and its significance (incidence, prevalence, and/or mortality data) from a global, national, and local perspective. Then, conclude by discussing the problem within the practicum site. (3 paragraphs)
2. Examine the global or worldwide prevalence, healthcare costs, and impact (mortality and/or other data) of the problem.
3. Examine the global impact on nurses, quality of care, healthcare organizations, safety, society and/or social justice considerations as relevant to the project problem.
4. Describe the national prevalence, healthcare costs, and impact (mortality and/or other data) of the problem.
5. Analyze the national impact on nurses, quality of care, healthcare organizations, safety, society and/or social justice consideration as relevant to the project problem.
6. Explain the problem at the practicum site. (If available and applicable, examine the incidence, prevalence, and financial impact.)
7. Examine the practicum site impact on nurses, quality of care, safety, social justice, and the healthcare organization.
8. Describe what the practicum site has done to address the problem, or state that there is no evidence that the problem has been addressed.
30 pts
Includes all requirements and provides an in-depth discussion about the problem.
27 pts
Includes all requirements and provides a sufficient discussion about the problem.
24 pts
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial discussion about the practice problem.
0 pts
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides an undeveloped discussion about the problem.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProject Aim and Supporting Objectives
Requirements:
1. Explain the specific overall aim of the project.
2. Identify 3-4 measurable objectives of the project that support the aim.
3. Place the objectives in a sequenced format (a)…, (b)…., (c)…., etc.
10 pts
Includes all requirements and provides an excellent discussion of the aim and supporting objectives.
9 pts
Includes all requirements and provides a very good discussion of the aim and supporting objectives.
8 pts
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a basic discussion of the aim and supporting objectives.
0 pts
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a poor discussion of the aim and supporting objectives.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePractice Question
Requirements:
1. Begin this section with a lead-in sentence such as, “The following practice question will serve as the basis for the DNP project:”
2. After the Lead-in Sentence, include your one-sentence practice question as it is stated on your DNP Practicum Readiness Form- Except do not include the name of the practicum site in the manuscript.
5 pts
Includes all requirements and provides an excellent practice question.
4 pts
Includes all requirements and provides a sufficient practice question.
3 pts
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a basic practice question.
0 pts
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides an undeveloped practice question.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferences
Requirements:
1. Reference publication dates must be within the last 5 years.
2. References must be from peer-reviewed journals, government websites, and/or credible national and global organizations related to the problem.
3. In-text citations should align with the reference page.
4. In-text citations and references must be in the current APA format.
10 pts
Includes all requirements and provides an excellent reference section.
9 pts
Includes all requirements and provides a sufficient reference section.
8 pts
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial reference section.
0 pts
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides an undeveloped reference section.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly Writing Criteria
Requirements:
1. Submit the paper on the DNP Project Manuscript Template
2. Use the headers in the template.
3. Use the current APA style and format throughout the manuscript.
4. Paper length is 2-3 pages.
5 pts
Includes all requirements and provides in-depth scholarly writing.
4 pts
Includes all requirements and provides sufficient scholarly writing.
3 pts
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a basic scholarly writing.
0 pts
Includes fewer than all requirements of APA style and standards and/or provides undeveloped scholarly writing.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity of Writing
Requirements:
1. Standard English usage and mechanics
2. No spelling or typographical errors
3. Organized presentation of ideas
5 pts
Includes all requirements and demonstrates excellent clarity of writing.
4 pts
Includes all requirements and demonstrates sufficient clarity of writing.
3 pts
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or demonstrates basic clarity of writing.
0 pts
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or demonstrates poor clarity of writing.
5 pts
Total Points: 80
PreviousNext
NR 702A Week 3 Discussion: The Literature Synthesis: Analyzing the Evidence
Purpose
The purpose of this discussion is to begin the analysis of evidence collected for your evidence-based intervention literature synthesis. Through comparing and contrasting an excerpt of your research synthesis and discussing it with student colleagues, you will examine the analysis process.
A suggestion for identifying themes in the research articles is to read the research results and discussion sections for each article. The authors will discuss elements (or themes) that influenced the outcome or results. For example, the research articles focused on diet and exercise in reducing obesity in elementary or middle-school age children. In the results section of the articles, the researchers talked about school and family support being integral to the success of the intervention. Some other research articles focused on culturally accepted foods that contributed to a successful outcome for the same intervention.
Instructions
Review this week’s readings and provide your response in 150 words or less:
State your practice question in PICOT format.
Examine the main themes in at least five (5) research articles demonstrating your intervention is effective in changing the practice problem and/or your outcome. (This research provides the strong support for an effective intervention)
Explain why the intervention was selected. Cite at least five (5) research articles in your discussion.
Attach the Johns Hopkins table to this discussion with at least five (5) articles supporting your intervention.
Refer to your completed Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool and the Johns Hopkins Research Evidence Appraisal Tool to answer this discussion question this week. If you need blank copies of the tools, they are located in the Student Resource Center under Project & Practicum Resources.
Use Grammarly and current APA format for the posts. Do not repeat the prompts in the post. Provide respectful and thought-provoking feedback to your student colleagues. Ask for clarification and elaboration if needed.
Please click on the following link to review the DNP Discussion Guidelines on the Student Resource Center program page:
Link (webpage): DNP Discussion GuidelinesLinks to an external site.
Program Competencies
This discussion enables the student to meet the following program competencies:
Integrates scientific underpinnings into everyday clinical practice. (POs 3, 5)
Applies organizational and system leadership skills to affect systemic changes in corporate culture and to promote continuous improvement in clinical outcomes. (PO 6)
Uses analytic methods to translate critically appraised research and other evidence into clinical scholarship for innovative practice improvements. (POs 3, 5)
Appraises current information systems and technologies to improve health care. (POs 6, 7)
Analyzes health care policies to advocate for equitable health care and social justice to all populations and those at risk due to social determinants of health. (POs 2, 9)
Creates a supportive organizational culture for flourishing collaborative teams to facilitate clinical disease prevention and promote population health at all system levels. (PO 8)
Translates a synthesis of research and population data to support preventative care and improve the nation’s health. (PO 1)
Leads others in professional identity, advanced clinical judgment, systems thinking, resilience, and accountability in selecting, implementing, and evaluating clinical care. (POs 1, 4)
Course Outcomes
This discussion enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
Synthesize scientific knowledge, theory, and practice expertise to inform evidence-based practice and impact outcomes. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8; POs 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9)
Design an evidence-based translational science project to address a practice problem. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8; POs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9)
Apply effective strategies in project design for managing practice problems in healthcare delivery at the micro, meso, and macro-system levels. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8; POs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9)
NR 702A week 4 Discussion: Evidence-Based Intervention: Rationale
Purpose
The purpose of this discussion is to analyze the evidence-based intervention chosen for your DNP practice change project. The evidence-based intervention must be supported by research articles demonstrating that the intervention is effective in changing the outcome for your project. This research is the foundation for choosing the evidence-based intervention, along with other factors that might support the intervention at the practicum site.
Instructions
Review this week’s readings and provide your response in 150 words or less:
State your practice question in PICOT format.
Create your rationale for choosing your evidence-based intervention.
List the high-level steps or activities in your evidence-based intervention implementation plan.
Use Grammarly and current APA format for the posts. Do not repeat the prompts in the post. Provide respectful and thought-provoking feedback to your student colleagues. Ask for clarification and elaboration if needed.
Please click on the following link to review the DNP Discussion Guidelines on the Student Resource Center program page:
Link (webpage): DNP Discussion GuidelinesLinks to an external site.
Program Competencies
This discussion enables the student to meet the following program competencies:
Integrates scientific underpinnings into everyday clinical practice. (POs 3, 5)
Applies organizational and system leadership skills to affect systemic changes in corporate culture and to promote continuous improvement in clinical outcomes. (PO 6)
Uses analytic methods to translate critically appraised research and other evidence into clinical scholarship for innovative practice improvements. (POs 3, 5)
Appraises current information systems and technologies to improve health care. (POs 6, 7)
Analyzes health care policies to advocate for equitable health care and social justice to all populations and those at risk due to social determinants of health. (POs 2, 9)
Creates a supportive organizational culture for flourishing collaborative teams to facilitate clinical disease prevention and promote population health at all system levels. (PO 8)
Translates a synthesis of research and population data to support preventative care and improve the nation’s health. (PO 1)
Leads others in professional identity, advanced clinical judgment, systems thinking, resilience, and accountability in selecting, implementing, and evaluating clinical care. (POs 1, 4)
Course Outcomes
This discussion enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
Synthesize scientific knowledge, theory, and practice expertise to inform evidence-based practice and impact outcomes. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8; POs 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9)
Design an evidence-based translational science project to address a practice problem. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8; POs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9)
Apply effective strategies in project design for managing practice problems in healthcare delivery at the micro, meso, and macro-system levels. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8; POs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9)
NR 702A Week 4 Assignment 1: DNP Project Manuscript Part 2: Literature Synthesis, and Evidence-Based Intervention
Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is to write the second part of the DNP Project Manuscript. This assignment will allow you to present your introduction, background, practice question, literature synthesis, and evidence-based intervention. These project design sections will be added to the DNP Project Manuscript Part 1 assignment. Turnitin will be applied to this assignment.
Instructions
Start with the week 2 paper and the feedback from your faculty. Ensure that all track changes are accepted and make all of the revisions that your faculty requested for the week 2 assignment. Students are required to make all requested revisions per your faculty feedback and Submit a Clean Copy of the week 4 paper. Add the evidence-based intervention and literature synthesis sections (Parts 1-4) to complete the Week 4 Assignment.
Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the assignment. Contact your course faculty if you have questions.
Part 2 will be graded on the quality of information, use of current research, Standard English usage and mechanics, APA format, and overall organization based on the required components as summarized in the guidelines and grading criteria/rubric.
Review the grading rubric carefully and consider how to incorporate each required criterion into Part 2 of the DNP Project Manuscript Template.
Review the tutorial on the use of the DNP Project Manuscript Template in the Week 2 lesson.
Follow the instructions on the template for the literature synthesis, and evidence-based intervention. Submit Part 2 of the DNP Project Manuscript.
Revise the Week 2 assignment by accepting the Track Changes and make the other revisions to your assignment that your faculty requested.
Research Synthesis and Evidence-Based Intervention
Part 1: The Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool
Before writing the synthesis, complete the Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool. Enter a minimum of 10 (or more) research articles supporting the evidence-based intervention in the table, entering the correct information in each column (Appendix A in the DNP Project Manuscript Template). The completed John Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Table should be located in Appendix A in the DNP Project Manuscript Template. You may use research articles focusing on the intervention from NR730 and other previous courses. Submit the completed John Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Table with this assignment in Appendix A.
Complete the Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool.
Enter 10 or more research articles supporting the evidence-based intervention.
The correct information is entered in each column.
Submit the Johns Hopkins Individual Summary Tool in Appendix A in the DNP Project Manuscript Template.
Use the Johns Hopkins Research Appraisal tool and the Johns Hopkins Evidence Level and Quality Tool to determine the level and quality of the research Articles for the last column in the Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Table.
Part 2: Brief Description of Intervention and Endorsement
In the DNP Project Manuscript Template, begin this paragraph under the Level 2 Header: Evidence-Based Intervention.
Begin this section with the name and brief description of the evidence-based intervention.
Identify the national organization or government agency that endorses the intervention, if applicable.
Part 3: Process, Outcome, and Themes of Research Evidence
In the DNP Project Manuscript Template, begin this paragraph under the Level 2 Header: Evidence-Synthesis
Start the synthesis section with a statement of how many articles are included, and all articles should support the intervention is effective in changing your selected project outcome and related to the population for your project.
The synthesis section must include at least 10 articles supporting the intervention.
The articles must be 5 years old or less.
The sources should be evidence-based, peer-reviewed research articles.
The synthesis may include both quantitative and qualitative research studies and national standards or guidelines.
In a brief summary statement, provide the numbers of research articles that are level I, II, and III and give a summary of the quality of the research articles.
Start each theme with a Level 3 Header as formatted in the DNP Project Manuscript Template. Each theme must have its own header as indicated in the DNP Project Manuscript Template.
Identify the main themes that emerge from the sources in the level 3 headers and in the paragraph under each header, describe how the intervention was used in the research to solve the practice problem or outcome
Please Note: This is not an article-by-article review and is not an annotated Bibliography. The synthesis is a separate writing method in which the themes are identified in the research articles and each theme is discussed and the research articles supporting that themes are cited.
Explain the differences (contrast the main points) in the research articles. In the DNP Project Manuscript Template, begin this paragraph under the Level 2 Header: Contrasting Results or Themes in the Research.
Present an objective overarching synthesis of research statement supporting the evidence-based intervention.
References
Information in this manuscript must be substantiated by citations.
Reference publication dates must be within the last 5 years.
References must be from peer-reviewed journals, government websites, and credible national and global organizations.
In-text citations should align with the reference page.
In-text citations and references must be in the current APA format.
Scholarly Writing Criteria
Submit the paper on the DNP Project Manuscript Template.
Use the headers provided in the template.
Use the current APA style and format throughout the manuscript.
Use the Chamberlain Guidelines for Writing a Professional Paper (located in Student Resources) to complete this assignment.
Turn on Grammarly to check the grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation as you write. (Note: if you have not already done so, please download the free version at Grammarly.com before construction of the assignment.)
Use third person in this DNP Project Manuscript. However, per APA, you can use first person in the project management section when you are talking about what you will do during implementation.
Note: Make sure to include the edited Part 1 manuscript items.
Writing Requirements (APA format)
Length: 3-5 pages (not including title page, references page and Part 1)
1-inch margins
Double-spaced pages
12-point Times New Roman font or 11-point Arial
Headings & subheadings
In-text citations
Title page
References page (without permalinks)
Standard English usage and mechanics
Organized presentation of ideas
Program Competencies
This discussion enables the student to meet the following program competencies:
Integrates scientific underpinnings into everyday clinical practice. (POs 3, 5)
Applies organizational and system leadership skills to affect systemic changes in corporate culture and to promote continuous improvement in clinical outcomes. (PO 6)
Uses analytic methods to translate critically appraised research and other evidence into clinical scholarship for innovative practice improvements. (POs 3, 5)
Appraises current information systems and technologies to improve health care. (POs 6, 7)
Analyzes health care policies to advocate for equitable health care and social justice to all populations and those at risk due to social determinants of health. (POs 2, 9)
Creates a supportive organizational culture for flourishing collaborative teams to facilitate clinical disease prevention and promote population health at all system levels. (PO 8)
Translates a synthesis of research and population data to support preventative care and improve the nation’s health. (PO 1)
Leads others in professional identity, advanced clinical judgment, systems thinking, resilience, and accountability in selecting, implementing, and evaluating clinical care. (POs 1, 4)
Course Outcomes
This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
Synthesize scientific knowledge, theory, and practice expertise to inform evidence-based practice and impact outcomes. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8; POs 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9)
Design an evidence-based translational science project to address a practice problem. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8; POs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9)
Apply effective strategies in project design for managing practice problems in healthcare delivery at the micro, meso, and macro-system levels. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8; POs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9)
Demonstrate project management and leadership skills in the design process for the evidence-based translational science project. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8; POs 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9)
Create collaborative relationships with interprofessional and intraprofessional groups to champion organizational improvements through project design. (PCs 2, 4, 5, 6, 8; POs 2, 4, 6, 8)
Due Date
By 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday
Late Assignment Policy applies
Rubric
Wk 4_Manuscript Part 2 Rubric
Wk 4_Manuscript Part 2 Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart I – Revisions Completed
Requirements:
1. All faculty-recommended revisions to Part I of the DNP Project Manuscript are completed.
2. The Week 4 paper is submitted as a Clean Copy (no track changes or comments are visible).
30 pts
Includes all requirements and provides in-depth revisions.
27 pts
Includes all requirements and provides sufficient revisions.
24 pts
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides partial revisions.
0 pts
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides an undeveloped practice question.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch Synthesis and Evidence-Based Intervention Part 1 – Johns Hopkins Individual Summary Tool
Requirements:
1. Complete the Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool.
2. Enter 10 or more research articles supporting the evidence-based intervention into the table.
3. The correct information is entered in each column.
4. The Johns Hopkins Individual Summary Tool is included as Appendix A in the DNP Project Manuscript Template.
30 pts
Includes all requirements and provides an in-depth Johns Hopkins Individual Summary table in Appendix A.
27 pts
Includes all requirements and provides a sufficient Johns Hopkins Individual Summary table in Appendix A.
24 pts
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial Johns Hopkins Individual Summary table.
0 pts
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides an undeveloped Johns Hopkins Individual Summary table.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch Synthesis and Evidence-Based Intervention Part 2 – Brief Description of Intervention and Endorsement
Requirements:
1. In the DNP Project Manuscript Template, begin this paragraph under the Level 2 Header: Evidence-Based Intervention.
2. Begin this section with the name and brief description of the evidence-based intervention.
3. Identify the national organization or government agency that endorses the intervention, if applicable.
20 pts
Includes all requirements and provides an in-depth description of the intervention and endorsement.
18 pts
Includes all requirements and provides a sufficient description of the intervention and endorsement.
16 pts
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial basic description of the intervention and endorsement.
0 pts
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides an undeveloped description of the intervention and endorsement.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch Synthesis and Evidence-Based Intervention Part 3 – Process, Outcome, and Themes of Research Evidence
Requirements:
1. In the DNP Project Manuscript Template, begin this paragraph under the Level 2 Header: Evidence-Synthesis
2. Start the synthesis section with a statement of how many articles are included, and all articles should support the intervention is effective in changing your selected project outcome and related to the population for your project.
3. The synthesis section must include at least 10 articles supporting the intervention.
4. The articles must be 5 years old or less.
5. The sources should be evidence-based, peer-reviewed research articles.
6. The synthesis may include both quantitative and qualitative research studies and national standards or guidelines.
7. In a brief summary statement, provide the numbers of research articles that are level I, II, and III and give a summary of the quality of the research articles.
8. For the Evidence Synthesis Section, In the DNP Project Manuscript Template, begin this paragraph under the Level 2 Header: Evidence Synthesis.
9. Start each theme with a Level 3 Header as formatted in the DNP Project Manuscript Template. Each theme must have its own header as indicated in the DNP Project Manuscript Template.
10. Identify the main themes that emerge from the sources and describe how the intervention has been utilized to solve a similar problem. Please Note: This is not an article-by-article review and is not an annotated Bibliography. The synthesis is a separate writing method in which the themes are identified in the research articles and each theme is discussed and the research articles supporting that themes are cited.
11. Explain the differences (contrast the main points) in the research articles. In the DNP Project Manuscript Template, begin this paragraph under the Level 2 Header: Contrasting Results or Themes in the Research
12. Present an objective overarching synthesis of research statement supporting the evidence-based intervention. ”
40 pts
Includes all requirements and provides an in-depth process, outcome, and themes discussion.
36 pts
Includes all requirements and provides a sufficient process, outcome, and themes discussion.
32 pts
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial process, outcome, and themes discussion.
0 pts
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides an undeveloped process, outcome, and themes discussion.
40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferences
Requirements:
1. Reference publication dates must be within the last 5 years.
2. References must be from peer-reviewed journals, government websites, and/or credible national and global organizations.
3. In-text citations should align with the reference page.
4. In-text citations and references must be in the current APA format.
10 pts
Includes all requirements and provides an excellent reference section.
9 pts
Includes all requirements and provides a sufficient reference section.
8 pts
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial reference section.
0 pts
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides an undeveloped reference section.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly Writing Criteria
Requirements: 
1. Submit the paper on the DNP Project Manuscript Template
2. Use the headers in the template.
3. Use the current APA style and format throughout the manuscript.
4. Paper length is 3-5 pages.
10 pts
Includes all requirements and provides in-depth scholarly writing.
9 pts
Includes all requirements and provides a sufficient scholarly writing.
8 pts
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides basic scholarly writing.
0 pts
Includes fewer than all requirements of APA style and standards and/or provides undeveloped scholarly writing.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity of Writing
Requirements:
1. Standard English usage and mechanics
2. No spelling or typographical errors
3. Organized presentation of ideas
10 pts
Includes all requirements and demonstrates excellent clarity of writing.
9 pts
Includes all requirements and demonstrates sufficient clarity of writing.
8 pts
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or demonstrates basic clarity of writing.
0 pts
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or demonstrates poor clarity of writing.
10 pts
Total Points: 150
PreviousNext
ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NR 702 Course Discussions & Assignments ( Week 2-8) HERE
NR 702A Week 5 Discussion: Methodology of Research Translation
Discussion
Purpose
The purpose of the discussion this week is to analyze a translation science model as the foundation for translation science.
Instructions
Review this week’s readings and provide your response in 150 words or less:
State your practice question in PICOT format.
Analyze the process of research translation into practice through a summary of the translational science or theoretical model you chose to support your project implementation. Include the main phases or constructs of the model in your analysis.
Add at least four activities that will occur during the project implementation under the appropriate step(s) or phase(s) within your chosen theoretical framework to demonstrate how this theory will provide the framework for your practice change project.
Use Grammarly and current APA format for the posts. Do not repeat the prompts in the post. Provide respectful and thought-provoking feedback to your student colleagues. Ask for clarification and elaboration if needed.
Please click on the following link to review the DNP Discussion Guidelines on the Student Resource Center program page:
Link (webpage): DNP Discussion GuidelinesLinks to an external site.
Program Competencies
This discussion enables the student to meet the following program competencies:
Integrates scientific underpinnings into everyday clinical practice. (POs 3, 5)
Applies organizational and system leadership skills to affect systemic changes in corporate culture and to promote continuous improvement in clinical outcomes. (PO 6)
Uses analytic methods to translate critically appraised research and other evidence into clinical scholarship for innovative practice improvements. (POs 3, 5)
Appraises current information systems and technologies to improve health care. (POs 6, 7)
Analyzes health care policies to advocate for equitable health care and social justice to all populations and those at risk due to social determinants of health. (POs 2, 9)
Creates a supportive organizational culture for flourishing collaborative teams to facilitate clinical disease prevention and promote population health at all system levels. (PO 8)
Translates a synthesis of research and population data to support preventative care and improve the nation’s health. (PO 1)
Leads others in professional identity, advanced clinical judgment, systems thinking, resilience, and accountability in selecting, implementing, and evaluating clinical care. (POs 1, 4)
Course Outcomes
This discussion enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
Design an evidence-based translational science project to address a practice problem. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8; POs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9)
Apply effective strategies in project design for managing practice problems in healthcare delivery at the micro, meso, and macro-system levels. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8; POs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9)
NR 702 Week 6 Discussion: Methodology: Formative Evaluation
Discussion
Purpose
The purpose of the discussion this week is to create a plan for the formative evaluation. (Please refer to the Week 6 Intervention Fidelity Lesson for this discussion). The intervention must be implemented as planned to achieve outcome success. As the project manager, you will create a process to check if the intervention is being implemented as planned. This process is called the formative evaluation. Intervention fidelity is high when the intervention is implemented almost exactly as planned. Low intervention fidelity indicates there is variance in the intervention implementation.
Instructions
Review this week’s readings and provide your response in 150 words or less: 
State your practice question in PICOT format.
Describe the formative evaluation plan for your project design, outlining the steps and/or tools you will utilize as the project manager to conduct this week-to-week assessment process.
Detail your plan for feedback if the results of the formative evaluation demonstrate low intervention fidelity.
Use Grammarly and current APA format for the posts. Do not repeat the prompts in the post. Provide respectful and thought-provoking feedback to your student colleagues. Ask for clarification and elaboration if needed.
Please click on the following link to review the DNP Discussion Guidelines on the Student Resource Center program page:
Link (webpage): DNP Discussion GuidelinesLinks to an external site.
Program Competencies
This discussion enables the student to meet the following program competencies:
Integrates scientific underpinnings into everyday clinical practice. (POs 3, 5)
Applies organizational and system leadership skills to affect systemic changes in corporate culture and to promote continuous improvement in clinical outcomes. (PO 6)
Uses analytic methods to translate critically appraised research and other evidence into clinical scholarship for innovative practice improvements. (POs 3, 5)
Appraises current information systems and technologies to improve health care. (POs 6, 7)
Analyzes health care policies to advocate for equitable health care and social justice to all populations and those at risk due to social determinants of health. (POs 2, 9)
Creates a supportive organizational culture for flourishing collaborative teams to facilitate clinical disease prevention and promote population health at all system levels. (PO 8)
Translates a synthesis of research and population data to support preventative care and improve the nation’s health. (PO 1)
Leads others in professional identity, advanced clinical judgment, systems thinking, resilience, and accountability in selecting, implementing, and evaluating clinical care. (POs 1, 4)
Course Outcomes
This discussion enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
Design an evidence-based translational science project to address a practice problem. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8; POs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9)
Apply effective strategies in project design for managing practice problems in healthcare delivery at the micro, meso, and macro-system levels. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8; POs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9)
NR 702 Week 6 Assignment: Final DNP Project Manuscript
Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is to write the final DNP Project Manuscript for NR702. This assignment will allow you to present your edited sections in Part 1 and Part 2 of the Manuscript and add the final methodology sections with the appendices for the final DNP Project Manuscript submission. Turnitin will be applied to this assignment.
Instructions
Use the DNP Project Manuscript Template in the current APA format. Start with the edited Part 2 Manuscript Assignment, complete all the edits received, and add the Methodology section and appendices as described below.
After submitting your assignment by the due date, and receiving feedback from your course faculty, you will have the opportunity to revise and resubmit your week 6 assignment one time and your assignment will then be graded.
Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the assignment. Contact your course faculty if you have questions.
The final manuscript will be graded on the quality of information, use of current research, use of Standard English and grammar, proper sentence structure, APA format, and overall organization based on the required components as summarized in the guidelines and grading criteria/rubric.
Review the grading rubric carefully and consider how to incorporate each required criterion into Part 3 of the DNP Project Manuscript Template. 
The Week 6 paper is submitted as a Clean Copy (no track changes or comments are visible).
Review the tutorial on the use of the DNP Project Manuscript Template in the Week 2 lesson.
Please make all the course faculty recommended revisions to your previous papers first. All course faculty recommended revisions must be completed to receive full points in the final assignment. Start working early on this assignment so you can ask your course faculty any questions you may have about the revisions required.
Your final submission will have the following sections:
Introduction/Background/ Purpose, Problem
Project Aim and Supporting Objectives
Practice Question
Evidence-Based Intervention with Research Synthesis
Methodology
Organizational Setting
Population
Translational Science Model and Project Management Plan
Plans for Sustainability
Follow the instructions in these guidelines and rubric for the organizational setting, population, and methodology sections. Include the appendices in this final manuscript per the instructions. Submit your edited Part 2 DNP Project Manuscript with the new sections added for this assignment. The Week 4 paper is submitted as a Clean Copy (no track changes or comments are visible).
Organizational Setting
Provide a detailed description of the setting for the project including the following:
State the type of healthcare setting or community setting.
Describe the location.
Explain the typical patient and typical diagnoses.
Identify how many patients or participants are seen monthly and- If applicable- state the average length of stay.
Describe the interdisciplinary care team that contributes to the patients’ health management and outcomes.
Population
Describe the details of your specific project population.
Estimate the approximate total number of participants.
Explain inclusion and exclusion criteria for the project.
Describe how you will enroll the participants and if informed consent is needed.
Translational Science Model and Project Management Plan
Identify the theory or model that will serve as the framework for the project; translational science models are recommended.
Identify the primary concepts or steps of the model.
Create the steps in your DNP practice change project that coincide with the theoretical concepts.
Create your project implementation plan that includes the timeline of weeks for the project (usual projects are 8-12 weeks, keeping in mind the requirement to implement the intervention for at least eight weeks).
Use the research articles to guide your intervention implementation plan. Create a detailed description of each step in the intervention implementation. Describe in detail how each participant will engage with the intervention from the beginning to the end of the intervention. Discuss who will implement the intervention, who will receive the intervention, when, where, and how. The intervention implementation must be a full eight weeks while the project implementation might be 8 to 12 weeks.
Include the plan for the pre-and post- summative data collection.
Include the weekly plan for the formative evaluation to ensure high intervention fidelity. Develop a week-to-week formative evaluation plan utilizing observation, 1:1 discussions, huddles, leadership meetings, or other processes to describe your project management oversight during implementation.
For each step or activity in the intervention plan, identify the intervention week in which that activity will occur.
Plans for Sustainability
Create your detailed plan to sustain the project over time.
Identify the specific strategies used to ensure the project has ongoing evaluation and modification as needed to ensure its success after your implementation phase is complete.
Appendices
Appendix A – Johns Hopkins Summary Tool with a minimum of 10 research studies leveled and graded (required)
Practicum site support letter (required)
Practicum site IRB letter (can combine with the practicum site support letter)
Compliance Checklist (formative evaluation documents) (required)
Data Collection Tools (if applicable)
Permission to use the data collection tool letter or email (if applicable)
Educational Offering Table (outline) (required)
Informed consent (if applicable)
Assent document (if applicable)
References
Information in this manuscript must be substantiated by citations.
Reference publication dates must be within the last 5 years.
References must be from peer-reviewed journals, government websites, and credible national and global organizations.
In-text citations should align with the reference page.
In-text citations and references must be in the current APA format.
Scholarly Writing Criteria
Submit the paper on the DNP Project Manuscript Template
Use the headers in the template.
Use the current APA style and format throughout this assignment.
Use the Chamberlain Guideline for Writing Professional Papers (located in Student Resources) to complete this assignment.
Turn on Grammarly to check the grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation as you write. (Note: if you have not already done so, please download the free version at Grammarly.com before construction of the assignment.)
Use third person in this DNP Project Manuscript. However, per APA, you can use first person in the project management section when you are talking about what you will do during implementation.
Notes:
Make sure to include the edited Part 1 and 2 manuscript items.
The nomenclature when saving the file should be Last name_First name_ DNP Project Manuscript_ NR 702_Date.
Writing Requirements (APA format)
Length: 10-12 pages (not including title page or references page)
1-inch margins
Double-spaced pages
12-point Times New Roman font or 11-point Arial
Headings & subheadings
In-text citations
Title page
References page (without permalinks)
Standard English usage and mechanics
Organized presentation of ideas
Program Competencies
This assignment enables the student to meet the following program competencies:
Integrates scientific underpinnings into everyday clinical practice. (POs 3, 5)
Applies organizational and system leadership skills to affect systemic changes in corporate culture and to promote continuous improvement in clinical outcomes. (PO 6)
Uses analytic methods to translate critically appraised research and other evidence into clinical scholarship for innovative practice improvements. (POs 3, 5)
Appraises current information systems and technologies to improve health care. (POs 6, 7)
Analyzes health care policies to advocate for equitable health care and social justice to all populations and those at risk due to social determinants of health. (POs 2, 9)
Creates a supportive organizational culture for flourishing collaborative teams to facilitate clinical disease prevention and promote population health at all system levels. (PO 8)
Translates a synthesis of research and population data to support preventative care and improve the nation’s health. (PO 1)
Leads others in professional identity, advanced clinical judgment, systems thinking, resilience, and accountability in selecting, implementing, and evaluating clinical care. (POs 1, 4)
Course Outcomes
This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
Synthesize scientific knowledge, theory, and practice expertise to inform evidence-based practice and impact outcomes. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8; POs 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9)
Design an evidence-based translational science project to address a practice problem. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8; POs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9)
Apply effective strategies in project design for managing practice problems in healthcare delivery at the micro, meso, and macro-system levels. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8; POs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9)
Demonstrate project management and leadership skills in the design process for the evidence-based translational science project. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8; POs 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9)
Create collaborative relationships with interprofessional and intraprofessional groups to champion organizational improvements through project design. (PCs 2, 4, 5, 6, 8; POs 2, 4, 6, 8)
Due Date
By 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday
Late Assignment Policy applies
Rubric
Wk 6 Manuscript Part 3 Rubric
Wk 6 Manuscript Part 3 Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRevision Reminder
After submitting your assignment by the due date, and receiving feedback from your course faculty, you will have the opportunity to revise and resubmit your week 6 assignment one time and your assignment will then be graded.
0 pts
No credit
0 pts
No credit
0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart I and Part 2 Revisions Completed
Requirements:
1. All faculty recommended revisions to Part I and Part 2 of the DNP Project Manuscript are completed.
2. The Week 6 paper is submitted as a Clean Copy (no track changes or comments are visible).
50 pts
Includes all requirements and provides in-depth revisions.
45 pts
Includes all requirements and provides sufficient revisions.
40 pts
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides partial revisions.
0 pts
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides poor revisions.
50 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganizational Setting
Requirements:
Provide a detailed description of the setting for the project, including the following:
1. State the type of healthcare setting or community setting.
2. Describe the location
3. Explain the typical patient and typical diagnoses.
4. Identify how many patients or participants are seen monthly and- If applicable- state the average length of stay.
5. Describe the interdisciplinary care team that contributes to the patients’ health management and outcomes.
20 pts
Includes all requirements and provides an in-depth organizational setting description.
18 pts
Includes all requirements and provides a sufficient organizational setting description.
16 pts
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial organizational setting description.
0 pts
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides an undeveloped organizational setting description.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePopulation
Requirements:
1. Describe the details of your specific project population.
2. Estimate the approximate total number of participants.
3. Explain inclusion and exclusion criteria for the project.
4. Describe how you will enroll the participants and if informed consent is needed.
20 pts
Includes all requirements and provides an in-depth description of the population.
18 pts
Includes all requirements and provides a sufficient description of the population.
16 pts
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial description of the population.
0 pts
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides an undeveloped description of the population.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTranslational Science Model and Project Management Plan
Requirements:
1. Identify the theory or model that will serve as the framework for the project; translational science models are recommended.
2. Identify the primary concepts or steps of the model.
3. Create the steps in your DNP practice change project that coincide with the theoretical concepts.
4. Include the timeframe for each step in your project plan (e.g. “in week 1 the data before intervention implementation will be collected” ) Create your project implementation plan that includes the timeline of weeks for the project (usual projects are 8-12 weeks, keeping in mind the requirement to implement the intervention for at least eight weeks).
5. Use the research articles to guide your intervention implementation plan. Create a detailed description of each step in the intervention implementation. Describe in detail how each participant will engage with the intervention from beginning to the end of the intervention. Discuss who will implement the intervention, who will receive the intervention, when, where, and how. The intervention implementation must be a full eight weeks while the project implementation might be 8 to 12 weeks.
6. Include the plan for the pre-and post- summative data collection.
7. Include the weekly plan for the formative evaluation to ensure high intervention fidelity.
8. For each step or activity in the intervention plan, identify the intervention week in which that activity will occur.
40 pts
Includes all requirements and provides an in-depth description of the Translational Science Model and project management plan.
36 pts
Includes all requirements and provides a sufficient description of the Translational Science Model and project management plan.
32 pts
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial description of the Translational Science Model and project management plan.
0 pts
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides an undeveloped description of the Translational Science Model and project management plan.
40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePlans for Sustainability
Requirements:
1. Create your detailed plan to sustain the project over time.
2. Identify the specific strategies used to ensure the project has ongoing evaluation and modification as needed to ensure its success after your implementation phase is complete.
20 pts
Includes all requirements and provides an in-depth plan for sustainability.
18 pts
Includes all requirements and provides a sufficient plan for sustainability.
16 pts
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial plan for sustainability.
0 pts
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides an undeveloped plan for sustainability.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAppendices
Requirements:
1. Appendix A – Johns Hopkins Summary Tool with a minimum of 10 research studies leveled and graded (required)
2. Practicum site support letter (required)
3. Practicum site IRB letter (can combine with the practicum site support letter)
4. Compliance Checklist (formative evaluation documents) (required)
5. Data Collection Tools (if applicable)
6. Permission to use the data collection tool letter or email (if applicable)
7. Educational Offering Table (outline) (required)
8. Informed consent (if applicable)
9. Assent document (if applicable)
40 pts
Includes all requirements and provides excellent appendices.
36 pts
Includes all requirements and provides a sufficient appendices.
32 pts
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides basic appendices.
0 pts
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides undeveloped appendices.
40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferences
Requirements:
1. Information in this manuscript must be substantiated by citations.
2. Reference publication dates must be within the last 5 years.
3. References must be from peer-reviewed journals, government websites, and credible national and global organizations.
4. In-text citations should align with the reference page.
5. In-text citations and references must be in the current APA format.
10 pts
Includes all requirements and provides an excellent reference section.
9 pts
Includes all requirements and provides a sufficient reference section.
8 pts
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial reference section.
0 pts
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides an undeveloped reference section.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly Writing Criteria
Requirements:
1. Submit the paper on the DNP Project Manuscript Template.
2. Use the headers in the template.
3. Use the current APA style and format throughout the manuscript.
4. Paper length is 10-12 pages.
10 pts
Includes all requirements and provides in-depth scholarly writing.
9 pts
Includes all requirements and provides a sufficient scholarly writing.
8 pts
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides basic scholarly writing.
0 pts
Includes fewer than all requirements of APA style and standards and/or provides undeveloped scholarly writing.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity of Writing
Requirements:
1. Standard English usage and mechanics
2. No spelling or typographical errors
3. Organized presentation of ideas
10 pts
Includes all requirements and demonstrates excellent clarity of writing.
9 pts
Includes all requirements and demonstrates sufficient clarity of writing.
8 pts
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or demonstrates basic clarity of writing.
0 pts
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or demonstrates poor clarity of writing.
10 pts
Total Points: 220
PreviousNext
NR 702A Week 7 Discussion: The Value of Peer Review
Purpose
The purpose of the discussion this week is to analyze the value of the peer review process as a DNP student and developing leader in healthcare.
Instructions
Review this week’s readings and provide your response in 150 words or less:
State your practice question in PICOT format.
Analyze the value of the peer review process of offering feedback as a future DNP-prepared nurse leader.
Describe a time when you provided peer review to a colleague.
Use Grammarly and current APA format for the posts. Do not repeat the prompts in the post. Provide respectful and thought-provoking feedback to your student colleagues. Ask for clarification and elaboration if needed.
Please click on the following link to review the DNP Discussion Guidelines on the Student Resource Center program page:
Link (webpage): DNP Discussion GuidelinesLinks to an external site.
Program Competencies
This discussion enables the student to meet the following program competencies:
Integrates scientific underpinnings into everyday clinical practice. (POs 3, 5)
Applies organizational and system leadership skills to affect systemic changes in corporate culture and to promote continuous improvement in clinical outcomes. (PO 6)
Uses analytic methods to translate critically appraised research and other evidence into clinical scholarship for innovative practice improvements. (POs 3, 5)
Appraises current information systems and technologies to improve health care. (POs 6, 7)
Analyzes health care policies to advocate for equitable health care and social justice to all populations and those at risk due to social determinants of health. (POs 2, 9)
Creates a supportive organizational culture for flourishing collaborative teams to facilitate clinical disease prevention and promote population health at all system levels. (PO 8)
Translates a synthesis of research and population data to support preventative care and improve the nation’s health. (PO 1)
Leads others in professional identity, advanced clinical judgment, systems thinking, resilience, and accountability in selecting, implementing, and evaluating clinical care. (POs 1, 4)
Course Outcomes
This discussion enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
Apply effective strategies in project design for managing practice problems in healthcare delivery at the micro, meso, and macro-system levels. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8; POs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9)
Demonstrate project management and leadership skills in the design process for the evidence-based translational science project. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8; POs 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9)
Create collaborative relationships with interprofessional and intraprofessional groups to champion organizational improvements through project design. (PCs 2, 4, 5, 6, 8; POs 2, 4, 6, 8)
NR 702A week 8 Discussion: Practice Readiness for the DNP Leader: Project Design and Management
Discussion
Purpose
The purpose of this discussion is to reflect on your own readiness to practice as a DNP-prepared nurse and consider what you learned in this course and how this knowledge will impact your practice.
Instructions
Each week, you have been reminded that reflective inquiry allows for expanding self-awareness, identifying knowledge gaps, and assessing learning goals. As you reflect on your own readiness to practice as a DNP-prepared nurse, it is important to consider what you learned in this course.
As you review the course outcomes and your experience in this course, address the following:
Analyze and evaluate how your thinking was challenged in this course related to project design and beginning your manuscript writing process.
Considering this new knowledge, examine how this learning prepares you to practice as a DNP-prepared nurse.
Use Grammarly and current APA format for the posts. Do not repeat the prompts in the post. Provide respectful and thought-provoking feedback to your student colleagues. Ask for clarification and elaboration if needed.
Please click on the following link to review the DNP Discussion Guidelines on the Student Resource Center program page:
Link (webpage): DNP Discussion GuidelinesLinks to an external site.
Program Competencies
This discussion enables the student to meet the following program competencies:
Integrates scientific underpinnings into everyday clinical practice. (POs 3, 5)
Applies organizational and system leadership skills to affect systemic changes in corporate culture and to promote continuous improvement in clinical outcomes. (PO 6)
Uses analytic methods to translate critically appraised research and other evidence into clinical scholarship for innovative practice improvements. (POs 3, 5)
Appraises current information systems and technologies to improve health care. (POs 6, 7)
Analyzes health care policies to advocate for equitable health care and social justice to all populations and those at risk due to social determinants of health. (POs 2, 9)
Creates a supportive organizational culture for flourishing collaborative teams to facilitate clinical disease prevention and promote population health at all system levels. (PO 8)
Translates a synthesis of research and population data to support preventative care and improve the nation’s health. (PO 1)
Leads others in professional identity, advanced clinical judgment, systems thinking, resilience, and accountability in selecting, implementing, and evaluating clinical care. (POs 1, 4)
Course Outcomes
This discussion enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
Synthesize scientific knowledge, theory, and practice expertise to inform evidence-based practice and impact outcomes. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8; POs 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9)
Design an evidence-based translational science project to address a practice problem. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8; POs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9)
Apply effective strategies in project design for managing practice problems in healthcare delivery at the micro, meso, and macro-system levels. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8; POs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9)
Demonstrate project management and leadership skills in the design process for the evidence-based translational science project. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8; POs 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9)
Create collaborative relationships with interprofessional and intraprofessional groups to champion organizational improvements through project design. (PCs 2, 4, 5, 6, 8; POs 2, 4, 6, 8)
Struggling to meet your deadline ?
Get assistance on
NR 702 Course Discussions & Assignments ( Week 2-8)
done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!